2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:5D

January 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bill Day (filmmaker) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bill Day (filmmaker) was changed by 2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:5D (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892994 on 2019-01-21T06:29:37+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kevin Gage (actor), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 22:38, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:5D (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

so, this is a public IP and I recently appealed on 2E. Anyway, I think the bad actor should instead have a topic ban on the biography of living people, so that they have a chance. Because someone living in my area under LTE data on AT&T vandalized Wikipedia. I know it is subject to frequent abuse, but can’t another punishment work? 2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:5D (talk) 16:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No. They aren't willing to abide by restrictions, hence the block. And we can't do a partial block, as the violations are across a wide range of articles. Yamla (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla, so can’t you implement many, or do some topic BANS? Also, teach them the beauty of other articles. Also, used block users as examples of what happens if you vandalize. 2600:387:5:807:0:0:0:5D (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

---