Welcome!

edit

Hello 2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.

Happy editing! - wolf 12:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Edits

edit

Stop undoing what I did! Countryking2001 (talk) 22:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you could please provide a source instead of relying on original research to add anything you like, I would be happy to let the information remain. 2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also noting that User:IronManCap undid your edit on Falcon (comics). 2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A (talk) 00:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, I was thinking about the OR problem too. I was thinking more along the lines of WP:INDISCRIMINATE though. IronManCap (talk) 00:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

OR

edit

Why isn't original research allowed on here? Countryking2001 (talk) 07:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Countryking2001: see WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability. IronManCap (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm TheresNoTime. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Roger E. Moore—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 00:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Can you explain how my edit was not constructive? 2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A (talk) 00:18, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

September 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm PerpetuityGrat. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Addams Family (video game series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I did explain why I removed the content; I moved it to another article. I will try again, but will you revert me for no reason? 2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

October 2021

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikibijay1 (talk) 14:07, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Wikibijay1, which edit do you think was unconstructive, this removal of an unsourced trivial mention in a book that has little context and may not even be mentioning the character in question? If you think there is value in leaving that there, I will comply, but a little more input from you here would be helpful. 2601:243:1C80:6740:52F:C87D:7250:594A (talk) 14:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)Reply