October 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Arecibo message—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:40, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arecibo message. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – The Grid (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This Help Desk question is apparently related. We do want articles to reflect the truth, or if something is a hoax and reliable sources strongly suggest that it is, we want to state that as well. To make the edit you did, you must provide reliable sources that contradict what reliable sources have said, and the article can state both theories.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply