2A02:A317:2144:1A80:50C1:6918:4D46:B419

May 2022

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Infante Carlos, Duke of Madrid—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, SunDawn, nice to meet you. Could you please advise the WP criteria for constructive and non-constructive contributions. Thanks, --2A02:A317:2144:1A80:50C1:6918:4D46:B419 (talk) 11:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello again, SunDawn. Grateful for your advice. You have reverted my edit in less than 60 seconds, but for some reason it takes you more than 24 hours to explain what yardstick you use to declare my contribution non-constructive. I would be grateful if you do not just add a link to some 5,000-word page on a specific WP policy; I would rather appreciate information what particular rule you used and how you gauged the info on Carlos VII's grandchildren against this rule. Thanks! --2A02:A317:2144:1A80:E121:A418:9430:E7D7 (talk) 09:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello 2A02:A317:2144:1A80:50C1:6918:4D46:B419 and 2A02:A317:2144:1A80:E121:A418:9430:E7D7, I take it you are the same person? I intended to reply to you yesterday but it seems that I forgot to reply. I reverted the edit because it has no sourcing. Any material that is added to Wikipedia have to be sourced, and any material can be challenged by any editors. If you have reliable sources on this manner, you can re-add it in the article, while also citing the source. Have a good day. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

---