User talk:3vvww661/Archive 0

Archive of all closed and resolved discussions of 2023

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to She-Hulk: Attorney at Law, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Favre1fan93 (talk) 23:31, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

An example has been provided. 3vvww661 (talk) 06:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at She-Hulk: Attorney at Law. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion has been moved to talk pages. 3vvww661 (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Talk:White defensiveness, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 14:56, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion has been moved to talk pages. 3vvww661 (talk) 20:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, 3vvww661, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  TJMSmith (talk) 02:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Of course! I hope I can continue to contribute, I have recently provided a contribution which I hope follows the NPOV policy. 3vvww661 (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Stubs

Hi, 3vvww661, and welcome to Wikipedia! With respect to your edits at Far-left politics, you can read about stubs at WP:STUB. You can get answers to any questions you have about editing Wikipedia at the Wikipedia:Help desk, or the WP:Tea house. Hope this helps, Mathglot (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I have been reading these articles and similarly related ones for about five to ten minutes by now. I found the list of article class types, and I believe I am beginning to understand what you were communicating better. 3vvww661 (talk) 05:37, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of African Queens (TV series)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article African Queens (TV series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 14:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

trout

	trout.
	trout/10 Pinky the rancher slime (talk) 22:45, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

I retract my self-trout.3vvww661 (talk) 22:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of African Queens (TV series)

The article African Queens (TV series) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:African Queens (TV series) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 01:41, 6 August 2023 (UTC)