62.252.130.4

Stop emptying out categories

...or you will face a loss of editing privileges. You are now edit warring. If you believe these categories should be deleted then take them to WP:CFD. If this continues, we'll need to protect these articles so you will be unable to edit them. So, please stop removing categories from them. It's disruptive editing. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

We don't need single-purpose editors] like you with irrational obsessions with specific categtories. You're probably a block evader. You are not welcome here. Graham87 (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.252.130.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yesterday, I edited a page called "List of British Jewish nobility and gentry". There is a section called "Life peerages" and I added every individual who, according to their Wikipedia articles, are both Jewish and Life Peers. An editor, called Graham87, reverted the edit and blocked me straight away, even though all of the edits were sourced from Wikipedia as well as articles attached to their respective pages. He even reverted edits that added the Category:Jewish British politicians to various wikipedia pages, where the person was Jewish, as well as a member of the House of Lords, including Government Ministers. Anyone who sits in the UK House of Lords is, by default, a politician, since they can vote on legislation. Please can I be unblocked and the editor, who blocked me, be spoken to. 62.252.130.4 (talk) 07:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The only thing I might speak to Graham87 about is to offer my thanks for preventing a disruptive editor from further harming Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 07:57, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.252.130.4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yesterday, I edited a page called "List of British Jewish nobility and gentry". There is a section called "Life peerages" and I added every individual who, according to their Wikipedia articles, are both Jewish and Life Peers. An editor, called Graham87, reverted the edit and blocked me straight away, even though all of the edits were sourced from Wikipedia as well as articles attached to their respective pages. He even reverted edits that added the Category:Jewish British politicians to various wikipedia pages, where the person was Jewish, as well as a member of the House of Lords, including Government Ministers. Anyone who sits in the UK House of Lords is, by default, a politician, since they can vote on legislation. Please can I be unblocked. 62.252.130.4 (talk) 09:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've already tried this. It was already declined. Don't waste our time like this. Yamla (talk) 10:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Declined requests for an active sitewide block may not be removed until the block is removed, per WP:BLANKING. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

---