Stupid me...

edit

Sorry about those edits to Gackt. I somehow got "ARE YOU“FRIED CHICKENz”??" (a release that charted and should have an article created) confused with "Yellow Fried Chickenz" (a release that didn't chart). >.< エムエックスさん 16:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

September 2010

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gackt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. My76Strat 03:37, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gackt. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. oncamera(t) 20:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have reported your actions to WP:AN3 as you were warned about your actions. oncamera(t) 21:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Gackt. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Chris (talk) 21:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Gackt

edit

I have resolved the issues you bought up on Gackt. Take a look at the talkpage section to join the discussion and share your civil opinion. oncamera(t) 01:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Gackt. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. oncamera(t) 23:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.