67.8.169.171

January 2023

Hello, I'm Vpab15. I noticed that you recently removed content from Inanna without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vpab15 (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

<3

We do good! 67.8.169.171 (talk) 19:35, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Inanna. Vpab15 (talk) 11:53, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

I believe a cleanup removal of impertinent cluttery information to have been a valid reason! So disagree. How would I appeal any warningless block I disagree with? Thank you! 67.8.169.171 (talk) 13:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

You need to seek consensus in the talk page when any change you do is reverted, per WP:BRD. That is especially the case when you are removing sourced content. Anyone is welcome to contribute to wikipedia, but you must treat other editors with respect and always assume good faith. See also WP:Civility. Never accuse others of vandalism or harassment just because they don't agree with you. Per WP:HA#NOT: Unfounded accusations of harassment are a serious personal attack and dealt with accordingly. Vpab15 (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

How would I appeal any warningless block I disagree with? Thank you! 67.8.169.171 (talk) 03:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

"Be careful with user warning templates. Be careful about issuing templated messages to editors you're currently involved in a dispute with, and exercise caution when using templated messages for newcomers (see Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers). Consider using a personal message instead of, or in addition to, the templated message." Have a nice life! 67.8.169.171 (talk) 03:21, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

<3

We Do Good! amen<3 67.8.169.171 (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Dudhhr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anselmo Alliegro y Milá have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – dudhhr ^talk _contribs (he/they) 15:49, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please explain on the talk page why you removed the Congressional Record citation. Peaceray (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 03:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

I have never added original research or novel synthesis of published material to articles. I will cite with the same reliable source you cited (Dover 1945) that supports the same common knowledge refered to in the article and which my edit helps to clarify. Please do not conjecture original research and novel synthesis when there has been none. I have cited reliable sources for all my contributions. Thank you. 67.8.169.171 (talk) 10:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---