Warnings

edit

February 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edward J. Sanford, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cheers! ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 15:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Lyman Hall has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ” TeLeS (T @ L C S) 17:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Edward Higgins White, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wally Schirra with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gus Grissom, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at High-value target, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you! -- Arthena(talk) 20:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

September 2011

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Science and technology in Germany. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Zarcadia (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

November 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Demeter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Meander has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 17:08, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stream with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 17:18, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of Gaugamela, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

April 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rostam Batmanglij, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.