70.66.130.107

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 70.66.130.107, has made edits to Guy Verhofstadt that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

• Help contents – the main help page.
• Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:22, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shrinking cities have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Sjö (talk) 05:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 2016 United States elections. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. There are also other edits, e.g. your edits in Via Rail that are poorly sourced and seem to be your own opinions. In addition, they are expressed in a way that doesn't follow Wikipedia's policy Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Sjö (talk) 08:24, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Guy Verhofstadt, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli ^Talk 11:30, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wilshire Grand Center. CLCStudent (talk) 21:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Judith Miller. Archer1234 (talk) 12:54, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Yes my edit was so disruptive you had to change the first paragraph to reflect that Judith Miller is a WMD hoaxer, amongst other journalistic crimes. She is a paid liar, I am not going to to make assumptions as for who, be it the Israeli Government, Defense Contractors, or Pilgrim Society types that were eager to see Samuel P. Huntington's Clash of Civilizations. I am tired of lackey's here, being paid to shill on WikiMedia for the respective clients and engage in defamation of unpaid minor contributors like me. One jackass said I was vandalizing the wikipage of the World Trade Center over an argument about the height, he claims the antenna is actually a "spire", so the real height of the tower is 1.776feet. Only someone working for Silverstein Properties would take such a position, considering the "spire" actually functions as a broadcast antenna. REF https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/restoring-over-the-air-tv-in-new-york-city-after-911 I have no conflicts of interest, declare yours ohh professional wikimedia editor.

October 2020

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of tallest buildings in North America. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. OWTC has the correct height listed per the sources provided; 1776 ft is the architectural height, factoring in the spire -- not the antenna as you incorrectly claim. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 06:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Ohh please with the technical babble bullshit. 1776 feet is not the height. You want to call it a "spire", which is really functioning CURRENTLY AS A BROADCAST ANTENNA! REF https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/restoring-over-the-air-tv-in-new-york-city-after-911 7

May 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Jan Marsalek, you may be blocked from editing. Laplorfill (talk) 06:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your source Der Tagesspiegel is a CIA front newspaper living rent free on the agency's dime, according to their own information. Knowing the amount of disinformation the CIA regurgitates I submit my edit was correct to remove unwarranted speculation as to the whereabouts of Marsalek. REF https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/WALDHEIM,%20KURT%20%20(DI)%20%20%20VOL.%203_0042.pdf

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:11, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 00:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

CS1 error on Vilnius

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Vilnius, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 03:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

---