Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. 03:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Brittany Murphy. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 19:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

SR 54, CR 587, and Gunn Highway

edit

I've driven all of SR 54 too, and I've also seen older maps of it, and I can tell you that west of Pasco County Road 587, the name Gunn Highway has been used for State Road 54. ----DanTD (talk) 23:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ban? I don't think so. I've got a 2003 Rand McNally map indicating that the name still applied to SR 54 west of Little Road, although it overlooks the Mitchell Bypass. Plus, from what I've seen it's you who has been facing the threat of a block. ----DanTD (talk) 01:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Okay, jackass. I already mentioned an older road map that indicate that Gunn Highway runs west from that northern terminus of CR 587 along SR 54 towards US 19, but there are plenty of others that say the same thing. The widening and realignment may've involved removing that name from street-name signs west of CR 587, but that was still an old name. Instead of picking a fight with me over this, try doing some goddamn research for a change?! Better yet look through some old FDOT plans, and old road maps, and what not, that included Gunn Highway existing along that section of SR 54. ----00:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Actually, notes like this are good for such lists. You shouldn't be surprised to find a few old fogies who still call that Gunn Highway. ----DanTD (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

January 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:DanTD has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Connormah (talk) 00:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:DanTD. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Connormah (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Actually, this user's personal attacks on my talk page are the least of my concerns. I'm more worried about his removal of information from two pages. But thanks for the support, Connormah. ----DanTD (talk) 00:25, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey you fucking nigger whore, I'm removing completely false information. BAN FORTHCOMING!

Oh, so now you're using racial slurs! Ever consider that we might BOTH be white?! Take a note, administrators! ----DanTD (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Connormah (talk) 00:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

February 2010

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matthew Broderick, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Amanda. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Amanda was changed by 71.100.31.227 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-02-10T05:28:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:DanTD. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Reach Out to the Truth 05:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:DanTD. Trusilver 05:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Trusilver 05:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Florida State Road 9B has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Interstate 10 in Florida. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 22:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to U.S. Route 19. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 22:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Month for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page PGA Tour Network has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. ScottyBerg (talk) 03:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User:DanTD has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WAYNEOLAJUWON 20:32, 18 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

This must be that klukker I had an edit war with earlier this year. ----DanTD (talk) 13:16, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply