73.1.41.245

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

10:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
73.1.41.245 (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

February 2019

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Cubeatz. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 06:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Hello, I'm TheAmazingPeanuts. I noticed that you recently removed content from I Am Greater than I Was without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lil Mosey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 01:22, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tay-K have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:03, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Astroworld (album) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Comethazine. Thank you. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:18, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on YNW Melly. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:04, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Lucky Daye, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Slimeball 3. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Scorpion (Drake album), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:48, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Tracy. Your edits are disruptive. If you continue to add unsourced info you are looking at the removal of your editing privileges Robvanvee 08:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Block

Hi Materialscientist, I don't understand why I was blocked. I've been adding sources to my edits. Yes this one here is unsourced, but I forgot to add an additional source to it, however this edit I added a source with legitimate info from a trusted source, which is Billboard. Another edit here I added with two sources. Thanks. 73.1.41.245 (talk) 09:00, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

I disagree. A simple glance at just your edits today reveal several (now reverted) unsourced additions. My warning was the final one after several (4) by other editors that point to an unheeded pattern of reference-less edits. Robvanvee 09:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Robvanvee, if you're referring to the Good Intentions article, the primary source was from Tidal, which was already contained within the article. I edit in several parts to build the information up. The other user Maintaining already improved most of it up anyway after. Same thing with the It Was Good Until It Wasn't article if you were planning to bring that up too. I forgot to add initially the sources (my mistake for that) for the edit you first spotted me from the Lil Tracy article, but I added sources after you reverted and were later accepted. I'm only wanting to improve credits and such, not hurt it. I also added sources for those articles which the other warnings originated from basically a year ago, took a grace period off and fairly recently started editing again. 73.1.41.245 (talk) 09:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

I was referring more to the amount of warnings you have already received for the addition of unsourced info and what seems to be your reluctance to abide by policy. If you truly have good intentions for Wikipedia perhaps either wait out your block or follow this procedure. Once unblocked or once the block has expired consider creating an account if you intend to edit frequently. Good luck. Robvanvee 09:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Robvanvee, I do abide by policy (or at least try to at the most), but users on here are quick to point fingers and take action rapidly because most likely the "IP" users on here do more harm than good. I understand why users on here act that way, but I was simply contributing to credits really and detailing it out, nothing else; if you took a better look at the edits I've made, I was trying to imply "good intentions" haha, but basically simply good faith [edits]. Like I mentioned before, I already put the correct sources in place after the warnings I was given way back and this April [& May now too with your warning] from each accused article, they were given to me real fast after editing while I was "building up" the corresponding article and adding all of respective sources after (which I should stop forgetting beforehand so I could stop getting warnings making it look like I'm trying to add unsourced info.) 73.1.41.245 (talk) 10:19, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

---