November 2017

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.158.81.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary to me because I know what I've been blocked for and will not do it again. 73.158.81.251 (talk) 21:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Please apply at the talk page of your registered account.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:11, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.158.81.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary to me because I understand what I've been blocked for and will not cause any damage or disruption to Wikipedia and will make useful contributions instead. 73.158.81.251 (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

As before - make your appeal from your account. Just Chilling (talk) 03:46, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2018

edit

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to United Airlines. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. David J Johnson (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock Request

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.158.81.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block is no longer necessary to me because I understand what I’ve been blocked for will not continue to cause any damage or disruption to Wikipedia and will make useful contributions instead. 73.158.81.251 (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Competence is required. This unblock request is the same as the others. Yamla (talk) 20:27, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.158.81.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My edits were correct and were not considered as sockpupperty.73.158.81.251 (talk) 22:46, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery me! 00:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked your access to this page for the next month. I don't know how many different ways we can tell you to make the request after signing in with your account. You've clearly been violating WP:SOCK and WP:BLOCK via this IP address. --Yamla (talk) 22:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

73.158.81.251 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This block is no longer nessary to me because I understand what I've been blocked for will not continue socking and will make useful contributions instead.73.158.81.251 (talk) 02:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You show a profound lack of competence and are now just wasting our time. Talk page access revoked for six months. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.