77.207.75.83

January 2019

To edit, please log in. Last edited: Last edited by: 21:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC) Lapablo (talk · contribs) Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Nick (talk) 13:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

why am I banished ?????? !!!!! What is that ???!!!!!--77.207.75.83 (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

You were blocked for disruptive editing. I'm surprised you didn't get a few warnings first but you repeatedly changed the genres of various films articles to horror without any evidence. I tried to advise you about the need for WP:RS reliable sources and I tried to explain that even if a film has elements of a horror film that doesn't necessarily make it a horror film.

If you show you understand the rules and agree to change your behavior then you could make an appeal and it might be possible to get your block time reduced. -- 109.79.172.66 (talk) 01:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

How ?! --77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

you could have made me "warnings", I do not know how Wikipedia works, can you answer me, please?--77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

I understand your frustration, but you were warned. You removed the warnings. See, for example, this warning, which explicitly warned you that you would be blocked if you continued. The problem is that you're changing film genres to say bizarre things, like that Bumblebee is a horror film. This is an extraordinary claim, and it requires a reliable source to back it up. Box Office Mojo, for example, calls it a "Sci-Fi Action" film. You can't just decide for yourself that something is a horror film despite what the sources say – this is original research and is forbidden on Wikipedia. If you're willing to follow our rules, make an unblock request via {{unblock}}. You should read this guide to unblock requests before you do so; it will help you understand what we want. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

I always saw Transformers as the quintessence of the horror movie, why would I change my mind? "extraordinary claim" what is this phrase ?! lots of people tell me that Transformers is a horror movie, I'm not the only one!--77.207.75.83 (talk) 14:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 17:55, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 years for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

what i have done ?--77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC) 2 years ? why ?!!!!!!!!!--77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:38, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Your edits aren't often very helpful from what I've seen. You seem to have good intentions but competence is required. You need to learn how to edit the site properly, if you do that you will likely be allowed back.★Trekker (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

i don't deserv 2 years please ! I did no harm! I did not post any insults to anyone! I beg you, don't banish me for two years! --77.207.75.83 (talk) 10:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

To be unblocked you must:

1. Understand why you were blocked
2. Accept that those behaviours were not in the best interest of Wikipedia
3. Promise to not do it again

That is all.★Trekker (talk) 07:03, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

I accept all the conditions--77.207.75.83 (talk) 08:35, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Then insert this template {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}} an explain that you truly understand. You should be aware that since you've been blocked before because of these issues, they might not cut you a lot of slack.★Trekker (talk) 09:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

what should I do? --77.207.75.83 (talk) 10:28, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Copy paste the unblock template and insert your reasoning for why you should be unblocked.★Trekker (talk) 10:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.207.75.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

because I only placed another genre on a wikipedia page of several movies, I didn't think I would hurt doing this, because I had no bad intentions in doing that, I thought I would enrich the pages, if that hurt someone well then sorry 77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:06, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's good that you didn't have bad intentions, but a mess created with good intentions is still a mess. This request does not convince me that you understand what you did and how it was wrong; you will need to describe that, tell what steps you will take to avoid doing it again in the future, and tell what constructive contributions you will make if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.207.75.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

the next time before changing the genre of a film, I would ask your opinion in the "talk" page, and you will make the decision whether or not the genre of the film may change, I made a mistake by not not asking for opinion. 77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No thanks. We'd be better off without you doing that. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

what do you want i say ?! 77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.207.75.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made mistakes by changing the genres of certain films, I would never do it again. 77.207.75.83 (talk) 11:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have concerns regarding your competence to edit Wikipedia. You have been blocked here multiple times since 2017. You are also blocked on simple.wiki and fr.wiki for the same types of edits, and your edits on es.wiki and pt.wiki were reverted as unhelpful. I don't believe that unblocking you at this time would benefit the encyclopedia. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.207.75.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

well I guess I have to apologize 1000 times that it is useless, it's been 12 hours that I argue and ... nothing! I'm giving up...I am extremely disappointed ... 77.207.75.83 (talk) 19:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 21:25, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

this is the last time i try to convince you

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

77.207.75.83 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would no longer change the genre of a film on a Wikipedia page unless I find good reliable sources that go in my direction. 77.207.75.83 (talk) 10:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

per concerns raised by SQL and JBW below.-- Deepfriedokra 07:29, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What specific constructive changes would you make, if unblocked? SQL^{Query me!} 19:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

I have looked at your editing history, and three things strike me. (1) Changing film genres is not the only problem. There are also other problems, such as edit-warring, and removing almost all content from an article without explanation. A very large part of the problem is that you do whatever you personally think best, without regard to the opinions of other editors. In fact I can even see talk page messages where you in effect announce that you have no intention of adjusting your editing to take consensus of editors into account, if your personal opinion differs from that consensus. I would be reluctant to unblock you unless you can show an understanding of those problems, and an indication that you would not do likewise again. (2) I am far from convinced that you actually understand what are "good reliable sources", so there is a risk that unblocking you on the basis that you will "no longer change the genre of a film on a Wikipedia page unless [you] find good reliable sources" may not deal with the problem. I would be far happier if you undertook not to change film genres at all, at least for a few years. (3) The substantial majority of your editing consists of changing film genres, and I have not seen a single example of an edit of any other kind which is significantly constructive. I therefore think it is essential for you to answer SQL's question above. There is no point unblocking you unless there is some constructive editing you are likely to do. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:48, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

i Don't want to be banned for 2 years

i really don't --77.207.75.83 (talk) 10:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

pouvez vous me débannir ?

--77.207.75.83 (talk) 14:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

No one is going to unban you because you asked in French. You need to convince an admin with a template like I've said.★Trekker (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

i asked in french, because i'm french dumbass !--77.207.75.83 (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Well you're never getting unblocked if you keep this up.★Trekker (talk) 17:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

tu veux que je fasse quoi bordel ! dis le !!!!! --77.207.75.83 (talk) 10:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

You can't do anything. You're not getting unblocked. You called someone who has tried to help you a "dumbass", safe to say no one wants you to come back.★Trekker (talk) 12:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

pour une pauvre insulte à la noix ? nan mais genre ? tu te prends pour qui ? James Bond ? t'es pas sérieux gros !--77.207.75.83 (talk) 13:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

maintenant tu vas me débannir ! j'en ai marre d'attendre ! --77.207.75.83 (talk) 13:24, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

And with that, I've removed your ability to edit this page, leaving UTRS as the last avenue available to appeal your block. SQL^{Query me!} 16:16, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fandom rivalry

Hello, 77.207.75.83. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fandom rivalry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:02, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

---