82.132.213.47

November 2016

Hello, I'm Satellizer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Netherton, West Midlands have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 13:12, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2021

Hello, I'm Always forever. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Holbrooks have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. always forever (talk) 07:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spencer^T•C 19:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.132.213.47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made a completely uncontroversial edit. So uncontroversial it was banal. Nobody could have had any rational objection to it. Nobody tried to even offer one. Instead, multiple editors reverted my change without explanation; multiple editors abused noticeboards to prevent my absurdly uncontroversial edit from being made. That is trolling, obviously. Anyone who would react in this way to a ludicrously uncontroversial edit is trolling. So why have the trolls been rewarded and encouraged? What do you think happens to an encyclopaedia when you block good editors and encourage trolls? 82.132.213.47 (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I don't think it's other users who are trolling here, and I think that you were lucky to only get a 31 hour block. The next one will likely be much longer. If you think that your vulgar attacks were the mark of a good editor, you have no business being here. 331dot (talk) 20:29, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

82.132.213.47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made no "vulgar attacks". I certainly expressed frustration, even anger. That is because I was attacked and harassed for no reason at all after making an utterly uncontroversial edit. Please explain why I deserved to be attacked for making that edit. 82.132.213.47 (talk) 11:52, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I strongly endorse 331dot's extension of this block to one week. Consider yourself lucky that the extension was only to one week. Yamla (talk) 12:16, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you don't think "seriously, fuck off, you pathetic troll" is a vulgar attack, or at least uncivil, I am only more convinced you shouldn't participate here at this time. I have made the block a week. Someone else will review your request but you will need to tell how you will control your frustration and anger, and also better handle editing disputes. 331dot (talk) 12:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

I am already editing elsewhere. Block this disposable IP for as long as you like - it makes no difference to me. Telling that user to fuck off was not a vulgar attack, it was an expression of anger at my absolutely unquestionably good edit being reverted for no reason and the user then templating my talk page repeatedly despite it being abundantly obvious that this was not welcome. They deliberately made the encyclopaedia worse; they harassed me for making it better. You are in favour of harassers who make the encyclopaedia worse. Eventually, people like you who become administrators despite showing zero evidence, at any point, of any scholarly aptitude or ability, will drive away all the good editors, and at no point will you even comprehend that you were killing Wikipedia. 82.132.213.47 (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

---