85.255.232.216

July 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Ball (footballer) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:52, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Meghan Markle, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 13:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Meghan Markle. Thank you. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 13:22, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Meghan Markle, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Meghan Markle was changed by 85.255.232.216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850968 on 2017-10-16T16:19:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NZ Footballs Conscience. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Meghan Markle, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You need to supply the source, just saying it has been published a number of times isn't good enough. You can't add information to a BLP without sources. It also may pay for you to read WP:BLPGOSSIP, we don't want to be recording every relationship she has had, just the important ones. If you feel that her relationship with the chef should be on the page, maybe take it too the talk page NZFC^(talk) 19:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Meghan Markle, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been told how to reference the information, you aren't providing a reference, that is the problem. Telling others how to find it isn't the same as you providing the information yourself. You can't provide it in the edit summary, it has to be in the article. NZFC^(talk) 20:25, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Samsara 22:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Spiro Agnew— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. PabloMartinez (talk) 12:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shemale. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shemale was changed by 85.255.232.216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.977569 on 2018-03-28T12:44:06+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Types of cheese, you may be blocked from editing. PabloMartinez (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Types of cheese.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Types of cheese was changed by 85.255.232.216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.966036 on 2018-03-28T12:48:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2019

Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to UberFacts— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 20:11, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UberFacts. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: UberFacts was changed by 85.255.232.216 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905589 on 2019-09-13T20:23:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm IamNotU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kebab have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. IamNotU (talk) 17:07, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Disley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 21:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moist. CLCStudent (talk) 11:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

20:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Dirkbb (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

March 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2011 England riots, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brum (TV series), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:57, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

July 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Corby, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---