October 2015

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Britannia Hotels. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 07:51, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sikh has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 10:33, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sikh. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sikh was changed by 85.255.235.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957633 on 2015-12-11T10:34:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anthony Quinlan, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 20:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Michelle McManus. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Josve05a. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Don Rees—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply