March 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Filmssssssssssss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bapsybanoo Pavry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. π‘­π’Šπ’π’Žπ’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’” (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
All sources indicate she was born "Bapsybanoo", so it's incorrect for the article to give "born as Bapsy Pavry". See https://collections.hampshireculture.org.uk/topic/marchioness-winchester, https://snaccooperative.org/ark:/99166/w6xd19jm, https://findingaids.library.columbia.edu/ead/nnc-rb/ldpd_7252968

So whether or not you arbitrarily decide my edit to be "constructive" or not (why don't people ever just say "I don't like what you changed and don't want it like that"?) it's correct information and, therefore, encyclopaedic.

Oh- I see, you're one of THOSE editors. Need to keep your quota up, so don't consider the individual facts of any case, just blitz through reverting. In this case you are quite incorrect to have done so, but I shan't expect an apology.