91.10.17.164

December 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.10.17.164 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The blocking admin was involved in a personal dispute with me, without even telling me (except in very general terms, eg "trolling") what I did wrong. I'm not aware of what specifically was my crime, but I'm willing to stop any unreasonable behaviour. 91.10.17.164 (talk) 11:01, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I took a look at your contributions. The block is entirely appropriate and if you can't see that, you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Yamla (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This admin was doing admin duties and reverted trolling. Not personal...you are just a number.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

---