95.91.249.178

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

how is it vandalism? it is just a normal request seriously explain how? 95.91.249.178 (talk) 00:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

come on explain how it is unconstructive. Dont just thnak you around. Explain mister 95.91.249.178 (talk) 15:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

regerg

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i made no disruptive edits only good request to make a page better an dpowermod banned with noe xplaination as what evenw as disruptiv

Decline reason:

Nonsense. Find another website. Acroterion (talk) 02:37, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nonsense. Find another website is no decline reasond dear Acroterion, stop absusing the box to post your subjective opinion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i did no disruptive editing just requested a better picture in page human penis, and said someone who requestet transgeder penis yes i agree. How it disruptive, no one could explaine and reason for it is becasue it is no disruptive. Also Acroterion as wiki admin yo should try bei objective at least little bit 95.91.249.178 (talk) 13:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think you're fortunate the block is only a week. 331dot (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Learn what a decline reason is Wiki admins " I think you are furtunate the blokc is onl ya week is a opinion not decline reason 331dot, stop abusing the edits.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

No reason for bann was given, request were made to mkae wikipedia better and simmilare are to other requests on tlak page for human penis

Decline reason:

Block extended to two weeks. Yamla (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reason for decline

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.91.249.178 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

again i did nothing wrong and my talk request was nomrla and in bounds of articel. Requesting a picture of ejaculating penis there on page of human penis is neither disruptive nor bad but a normal request. and second do any of you know what decline reason means? Posting own subjective opinions and blocks are not intended as a punishment so you cant just extend block as punishment for asking question and "Block extended for two Weks" is not a decline reason. Give me reason somthing you as admins are expected to provide by wikipedia guidelines

Decline reason:

I see you inserted further disruption into a post by Acroterion here, as if Acroterion had written it. It's still there! Your block has been extended to four weeks, and your access to editing this page has been removed. Bishonen | tålk 21:25, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2024

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

 Bishonen | tålk 21:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

---