98.97.116.80

Your submission at Articles for creation: Averijlanksche Medutis-Saprotis & other questions (December 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Please tell me more. 98.97.116.80 (talk) 23:37, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, 98.97.116.80! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. 98.97.116.80 (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Averijlanksche Medutis-Saprotis & other questions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Averijlanksche Medutis-Saprotis & other questions, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Please tell me more. 98.97.116.80 (talk) 01:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:98.97.116.80. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Lemonaka (talk) 18:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

I did not understand what you meant by promotional material to Wikipedia. 98.97.116.80 (talk) 01:27, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

IP editor: edit of yours added links to a business website. It should never have been posted on your user talk page, and so you were warned not to add such off-topic content again. We see such links as promotion - so please read this page to learn what we mean: WP:PROMOTION. Wikipedia is not a playground for bored people to mess around on, so we warn editors who place the wrong type of content that breaches our rules, or try to use Wikipedia to link to their favourite website for no valid reason. My advice is not to repeat that. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, you may be blocked from editing. Lemonaka (talk) 18:22, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Khan Academy. Andethyst (talk) 18:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Why is this important? 98.97.116.80 (talk) 19:02, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 18:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Why is this important? 98.97.116.80 (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

The answer to this vague question of yours can be given in one of two ways.:

• You must never, ever ask questions about an article by actually editing that article. We view this as vandalism, and repeat offenders who disrupt in this way will be blocked from further editing. You must always use the article's talk page to ask serious questions.
• The answer as to why Khan Academy is, itself, worthy of a page here (whilst others do not) can be found in our policy on whether or not any given topic is deemed WP:NOTABLE. In this case the subject meets our Notability criteria for businesses. Others might also meet them; it may be simply that nobody has bothered to do so as yet. Or it may simply not be notable under our definition.

In future, please try not to ask questions in a way that is disruptive, or are not clear enough for people to understand. We aren't all mind-readers, so clarity in any questions will help us answer you, and ensure that someone asking confusing questions isn't simply trolling us. (We block people who do the latter, as it wastes time for everyone.) So, simply watching and listening to what other editors do can be a very good way of learning without the need to ask trivial questions like this one. But note that I have actually answered it there for you. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Question 108

Who is the current owner of Democratic Party? 98.97.116.80 (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Hoary (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

I am not sure why are you doing this to me? 98.97.116.80 (talk) 02:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

---