September 2020
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 16:49, 22 September 2020 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
99.7.151.39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not trying to get around a block, and I am not editing actual Wikipedia pages. I am just commenting on the Noticeboard and requesting assistance from admins to address other editor's violations of the biography of living persons policies. Usually a block would be for disruptive editing, etc. but I am not doing any of that. There are false accusations within the sockpuppet investigation grouping me together with other users who I am not. I only edited the page briefly and since then I have had very little activity other than providing my comments to the Noticeboard. 99.7.151.39 (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Looks pretty clear to me that you are trying to get around a block, as per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whey77/Archive. If that's not the case, you need to specifically address that. Restricting yourself to noticeboards (which, frankly, you are not doing) isn't relevant here. Yamla (talk) 17:59, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
99.7.151.39 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not trying to get around a block, as the block expired. A block duration is related to a user likelihood of repeating inappropriate behavior. Ever since I was blocked, I have not tried to change any content on the biography (or any other actual encyclopedia pages). Instead I limited my comments to the Noticeboard and to the Talk pages on administrators asking them for assistance in oversight on the BLP policies. The block expired, and it does not seem fair or justified that it would be renewed when I have not even tried to edit the page any longer. There is speculation from involved parties in the dispute that I am Whey77 and other users and that is absolutely false and I am being wrongly accused. If other users have inappropriate behavior it should not include me simply by default as I am not connected to them in any way. 99.7.151.39 (talk) 19:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you have at least one blocked account, you cannot edit under any account or IP. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:18, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |