User talk:A3RO/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
June 2008
Can you just leave it up for one hour? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.47.11 (talk) 03:25, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- LOL, No! --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
PLEASE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.47.11 (talk) 03:29, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry mate, even though it made me laugh for like, not even a second, it is still vandalism. =) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 03:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
It's not vandilism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.47.11 (talk) 03:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Mmhmm... I can be pretty patient with people when they provide enough entertainment or arguement but VANDALISM is a No, No! =) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 03:43, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Ronritzman.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.47.11 (talk) 03:40, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Aww, lol. Thank you for posting it like 50,000 times too. ;-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 03:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, that's enough... you're just getting annoying now. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Maybe it wasn't a good idea...
..to put my picture on wikipedia :( --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe it wasn't a good idea to use the same computer I.P. as your account was registered under. :-/ --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk)
- In other words, I know your using your IP to vandalise Wikipedia. Stop posting on my discussion page. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 04:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Oops!
I don't think that was meant to happen! - Alison ❤ 04:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oh wow! LOL. Yes, sorry. I don't know why it blanked the requests, it should of just added my request. Thank you for undoing the edit Alison. I owe you one. ;-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Good job
Thanks for clearing the vandalism out of Architects Registration in the United Kingdom. Salisian (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome! --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008 (cont.)
Eric...
You posted that my revision of the page, concerning Goodrich Middle School in Lincoln, Nebraska was vandalism. I simply do not agree, as it's all true. I, personally, experienced everything I posted on that page. I feel you have made a grievous error, and request you revert it in the interests of fairness and journalistic integrity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.148.27.230 (talk) 16:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- No can do! Sorry! (Ref. to talk page of 72.148.27.230(Unregistered I.P.)) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 23:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
America's Best Dance Crew
Hey, I noticed that you'd been reverting a lot of the edits to America's Best Dance Crew setting the winner as JabbaWockeeZ, as I had... but I just checked it out, and I think they actually did win, rather than Kaba Modern. I think we've been acting on a false positive. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 23:47, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- I requested the page for protection and a whitelist user made the last edit, so I'm not going to touch it anymore. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
June 2008 (cont.)
Proper little Mr. Serious you arn't you. I bet girls love it. Har.
- Mmm... not just the girls I suppose. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 20:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
You didnt respont back to me.
- Yes I did, I just moved it down to the bottom of the page, besides what else would you like me to say? --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Beat Me
Ugh, you've beat me to vandalism a few times in the last few minuets:-P Nice work:-) Keep up the fight!--SJP (talk) 00:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- LOL! Thank you, sometimes Huggle goes slow on some days and fast on the next, but other than that it is a pretty awesome program. =) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 00:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Having good anti-vandalism tools is a big help, but practice is very important to make yourself a fast, and accurate vandal fighter. A year ago I actually got really fast/accurate.--SJP (talk) 00:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm getting use to it now. I guess I got good eyes too. Haha word ;-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'll have to re-get use to it;-) Back in June of last year I got over 5K reverts(mainly), and the majority of them were after mid-June. During that time I only made 1 mistake. From late November until the middle of this month I was very inactive, so I'm not as good of a vandal fighter, but I hope to become that good again.--SJP (talk) 08:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's pretty awesome, so maybe If I ever need help with anything... I could come to you then :-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 01:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Having good anti-vandalism tools is a big help, but practice is very important to make yourself a fast, and accurate vandal fighter. A year ago I actually got really fast/accurate.--SJP (talk) 00:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Buffet
It's pronounced 'bü-ˈfā (boo-fey). It's a French word. A common mispronunciation is buff-fey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.251.94 (talk) 08:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for this, but it is not nessecary to add the pronounciation of the word in the article, that is why I removed it. If you want, you can add a section about the origin of the word if there is not one already, following Wikipedia's guidelines. Ciao. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 15:45, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
I figured someone would come to my talk page about that... I asked if it would be OK at the help desk, but I don't believe anyone's answered yet. Yes, it's not blatant vandalism. But it is blatant vandalism to someone familiar with the subject- the edits Guitarwhatever made were just plain fabrications. I admire his/her creative writing spirit, but it's just lies. None of the information s/he added to the article was ever so much as mentioned in the game or anywhere else, except perhaps in some twisted fanficiton. I didn't know if it was OK to revert more than three times in this case, but it was vandalism. Alinnisawest (talk) 16:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I understand if you are worried about edit warring becuase the edits you undid can be plausible to another user, however, if that was the case you are not stateing the reason in the Edit Summary. When you go to undo a revision it states to clearly explain why you are undoing the edit if it is NOT vandalism. Those edits may be vandalism to you but you must clearly explain why, after that you can follow the procedure to warn the user, remove the contribution(s) then report if nessecary. Thanks. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 16:59, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- All right, thanks for explaining it to me. I think I'll do a "dummy edit" to explain why I reverted it, and in the future remember to clarify exactly why I'm reverting their edits. Thanks again! Alinnisawest (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- No problem mate, the big thing is the edit summaries. =) Take care and keep up the good work too! ;-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 17:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- All right, thanks for explaining it to me. I think I'll do a "dummy edit" to explain why I reverted it, and in the future remember to clarify exactly why I'm reverting their edits. Thanks again! Alinnisawest (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:05, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Image:EricV891.jpg missing description details
Image:EricV893.JPG missing description details
Stressed Opinion
 | This user believes that a user's edit count does not necessarily reflect on the value of their contributions to Wikipedia. |
--♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 03:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Your RFA
I just wanted to say you do a great job with fighting vandalism; however, I am concerned about the lack of copy-editing in your self-nomination and/or in your answers to questions; on the one hand this comes across as showing a lack of power hunger, which is a good thing, but on the other hand it seems somewhat unbecoming of an encyclopædist. I really do not mean this sarcastically and I hope that it did not come across that way. In any case, if you should choose to send me a reply, then please do so on my talk page. Thank you. Bwrs (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Your Rfa
I hope you aren't feeling bad because of your Rfa. You're a excellent vandal fighter, and a asset to the encyclopedia:-)--SJP (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
- Not at all, thanks for the kind comments, I'm more of a realist, I really didn't expect to make it ;-). However, I do feel some of the comments and opinions on my nomination page are not respecting Wikipedia's civility guidelines and are creating a conflict of interest amongst other editors. Thanks for the kind comments too SJP, I hope you are doing well. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Eric - I don't feel I can vote in your rfa as you work in areas that I don't go near (eg I've never used Huggle). I rarely vote in rfa anyway, unless I know the candidate from personal experience but I was just over there and saw your app. and wanted to wish you well - you do indeed seem like the nice guy your User Page hints at! All the Best Plutonium27 (talk) 03:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- No worries. Ciao. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 10:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Wrong person
That's ok. It seems to be happening to me a lot lately D0762 (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, so I saw. :-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 11:51, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
ACC Tool
Hi, Did you just create an account on the ACC tool? I just need to check its you before I approve you --Chris 08:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes sir :-) --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 08:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- You're now approved to use the tool, would you like me to add you to the account creator user group so you can bypass the 6 accounts a day limit? --Chris 09:02, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yes please, thank you. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 09:03, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Done - enjoy! Don't forget to subscribe to the mailling list for important updates! --Chris 09:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Done subscribed! :-), thanks Chris. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
MySpace link
It would appear that the link is external so I can provide you with assistance there, Jason. Also, the Paltalk program is a third party program so leave a message regarding the problem there. Thanks. --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 09:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Admin
You have my vote !! JeanLatore (talk) 16:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hahaha... --♣ẼгíćЏ89♣ (talk) 23:08, 29 June 2008 (UTC)