User talk:ABBAS K.CH/Archive 1

Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pouya Pourali (Football Player) (January 22)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ABBAS K.CH! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Just why?? ABBAS K.CH (talk) 13:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

He was a proffesional player ABBAS K.CH (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

And I get 99% of this information from transfermarkt.com , you can check it from this link: https://www.transfermarkt.com/pouria-pourali/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/438567/plus/0?saison=&verein=&liga=&wettbewerb=&pos=&trainer_id= I even corrected the mistake that this site has made in the player's name because his name is Pouya and not Pouria! ABBAS K.CH (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please approve this draft (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pouya_Pourali_(Football_Player) because: He was a proffesional player. And I get 99% of this information from transfermarkt.com , you can check it from this link: https://www.transfermarkt.com/pouria-pourali/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/438567/plus/0?saison=&verein=&liga=&wettbewerb=&pos=&trainer_id= I even corrected the mistake that this site has made in the player's name because his name is Pouya and not Pouria! ABBAS K.CH (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Links to draft articles

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Zob Ahan Esfahan F.C.. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand,Please explain more and show me my mistake ABBAS K.CH (talk) 16:22, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pouya Pourali (Football Player) (January 24)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re tags at Pouya Pourali

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hey there, thanks for editing Wikipedia! Regarding the tags that I placed on the article now in mainspace: while there is a list of reverences given (I haven't checked this list to see if they are reliable or not), it does not have any in-line citations. More information on how they should be used can be found here: WP:ILC.

Thank you, and have a good day! –AFreshStart (talk) 01:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you and dont worry we are talking about all the source in persian wiki and We approved it ABBAS K.CH (talk) 04:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:40, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

January 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Pouya Pourali, you may be blocked from editing. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source and should not be cited in articles. Citing it without knowing better is one thing. Continuing to do so, despite knowing the problems with it is disruptive. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:33, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Dear Sir Sputnik

Thank you very much for your attention, but the information you have from this site is wrong and incorrect.Noteworthy that the Transfermarkt site is a very reputable site and is managed by well-meaning and capable people, and their information and statistics are prepared accurately by their experts and reporters, and are placed on the site after review. It is very strange that you consider this site invalid and you should change your mind. This site is very accurate and accurate, unlike Wikipedia (which is a free encyclopedia and anyone can freely create or edit articles on Wikipedia based on any amount and any kind of information they have) By people with experience and expertise in the field of sports information and statistics and valuation of various football players around the world; Written and adjusted. Be victorious and steadfast; Thanks

As I've already explained to you, much of the site's content can be edited by its users. According to its login page: Whether player info, coach info, club info, or match report – as a Transfermarkt user, you can edit and add to almost all data by yourself. This makes it a self-published source that does not meet Wikipedia's reliability standards. Cite the page again and you will be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:12, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

jan 2022

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

So if I do what you say and delete this link, how can I show that the article I wrote is true? ABBAS K.CH (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Find other sources. My suggestion would be to look at the articles on other Zob Ahan players to see what sources they cite. Chances are those sources will have covered Pourali as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

what about this: https://www.footballdatabase.eu/en/player/details/470400-pouria-pourali ABBAS K.CH (talk) 19:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@Sir Sputnik: What happened??🤔🤔 ABBAS K.CH (talk) 09:30, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

I warned you that if you cited transfermarkt again you would be blocked, and then you did this. What did you expect? Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ABBAS K.CH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As you said before, I brought a new source for that article a long time ago ABBAS K.CH (talk) 09:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Sir Sputnik: No, you said you should not cite this site as a source. The same thing happened and I said or quoted about the value of the player that written by this site.I know and accept the rules and I accept the words of the managers too and I think it was a little wrong about judge me. ABBAS K.CH (talk) 14:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

If you genuinely believe that you have not cited Transfermarkt here, I have to seriously question whether you have the required competence to be editing here. You took information from an unreliable source, knowing it to be an unreliable source, and included it in the 'pedia. That's not okay, and given our previous exchange you should have known that. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@Sir Sputnik: yes I know what did you say. but I didn't think this work (writting about the player value at transfermarkt in the Article) was against the rules of Wikipedia, But now I got it and learned.Thank you for your warned ABBAS K.CH (talk) 20:06, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Arnau Comas moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arnau Comas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

@Spiderone: Hello. This article is in the context of a stub-article (which unfortunately I did not know the template of stub-article for the English wiki) which should be completed with the participation of other users. Regarding the sources, I must say that according to the content posted, the official website of Barcelona Club has been used as the source of this material. I emphasize again that this article is a stub and should be published so that it is available to everyone and other users can expand it. Please reconsider the content is not so much that it can not covered with these resources. Ofcourse that I complete it too. Thank U🙂 ABBAS K.CH (talk) 10:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Barcelona is not an independent source (see WP:IS) since he plays for that club. He also doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL as he has never played in a competitive match between two WP:FPL sides. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I've told you how many times that you need to stop citing Transfermarkt? Despite a previous block for this same behaviour you cite the website in Sajjad Danaei. Do not do that again or the next block will likely be indefinite. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

@Sir Sputnik:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ABBAS K.CH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi. I'm just converted this article from Persian to English and i did not look at its sources at all. When I found out, that the user Joseywales1961 mentioned this. Today I was going to look into the matter and find a new source that I realized i was block. There was no intention on my part and I was fully aware of it because I had already get the warning from you about this site (TransferMarkt). I just made an inadvertent mistake here and there was no intention, I am familiar with the rules ABBAS K.CH (talk) 09:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, you've said this before, back in February. Yamla (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: Hi. Yes, I mentioned in my speech that I have received the same warning before. But respectfully, if your impression is that this words is a cliché, I have to tell you that no such thing is true. If you look at my to-do list after that warning, you will see that it was not done; it was not my fault, and anyone could have done this mistake. Unfortunately, I've just moved the source, not looking for the source, not searching for it, and then just adding it to the article. I was just a transmitter. That's all. After this incident, I went to the Persian article and deleted the two sources from the site (TransferMarkt) and added other sources to it [1]. It is not that I want to circumvent the rules or do anything else. I said it was a mistake that anyone can make because we are all human, but it is important that we realize our mistake. After realizing this issue, which was sent by the user Joseywales1961, I was going to correct it at the top of the article, but unfortunately it was too late and I was blocked 😄😅 I have already talked to Sir Sputnik and realized the importance of the issue. ABBAS K.CH (talk) 11:06, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arnau Comas (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arnau Comas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arnau Comas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 14:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

@HitroMilanese: Ok, I got it. ABBAS K.CH (talk) 09:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

GSA Names of players

Names of players correctly and accurately Use this site. Futebol 9 (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@Futebol 9: More precisely than I am Iranian and I know the name of the player 😄. You see, I have given a good explanation on the discussion page of the article (Talk), but here I also say that if we want to use "Shojae", it becomes "شجاعه" in Persian, if his name is "شجاع" and we should use "Shoja". If you do not believe me, the player himself used "Shoja" in his Instagram ID([2]).

Regarding this site, I have to say that all the sites have all their content that is not accurate, for example, look at the Pouya Pourali page on Gsm 👈 ([3]), where they called him Pouria, which is completely wrong.ABBAS K.CH (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

I understand what you mean but in Wiki must use the official name registered in the FIFA/AFC/FA records, if any. His name officially registered in the records of AFC is Shojae Page/Match. Reliable site for international such as GSA. For example, Pouya played only league matches, according to IPLstats, his name is Pooya. Futebol 9 (talk) 21:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Sajjad Danaei

Hello, ABBAS K.CH,

Thank you for creating Sajjad Danaei.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

your edits

hello, please don't make changes on footballists Honours like this because it's not common on wikipedia, (×1) : the true edit is : (1) .thanks--Miha2020 (talk) 22:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Miha2020:Hi, I really did not know that this is not common, but why is it wrong to have this shape as well. But Ok from now on, I will definitely use the common form in the wiki.😉 ThanksABBAS K.CH (talk) 08:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

hi again.If you want to be a good editor, read a lot of pages and avoid tasteful editing. another thing, before publish your edits, see : show preview and then approve your edits. thanks Miha2020 (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

you changed Omid Alishah born place from Sari, Iran to Sari ! why? that's not correct. please be careful of your details of edits.--Miha2020 (talk) 13:02, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

@Miha2020: Hello. Well I saw that the writing [[Sari, Iran]] that it was not the form that I knew so I changed it to [[Sari]], [[Iran]].ABBAS K.CH (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 2022–23 Persepolis F.C. season and 2021–22 Hazfi Cup. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

I dont know about this. I got it and thank you for it.ABBAS K.CH (talk) 17:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

2022–23 Hazfi Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2022–23 Hazfi Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 21:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

@Styyx: Got it. Thank U ABBAS K.CH (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

@Styyx: Hello, I updated the draft 2022–23 Hazfi Cup with the wiki rules and completed it and it is ready to be published in the name space. please consider it. THANK U ABBAS K.CH (talk) 09:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

For Oshwah

@Oshwah: Hi Oshwah Manager I'm not a sockpuppet and I do not have a sockpuppet. Why did you decide so simply and in such a hurry? You deleted all the articles I worked on simply and with a wrong judgment, and this is unfair. You can find out with a little research. I have a Wikifa account and I have been there for 10 months and I started my activity from there. I got Hamid Motahari's article from SimpleWiki at this address and redirected it to enwiki because I was writing and completing the 2022–23 F.C. Persepolis Season article, and I first created this article on Wikifa before that and these I was doing it at the same time. Respectfully, you made a wrong judgment and your wrong judgment led to brokedown everything. If you notice, the M86r user has been on enWiki for 5 months like me and He has also been a member of Wikifa for 5 months and has no specific account at all, and it is clear that he is a Sockpuppet account, but I have been there for 10 months, so the M86r user is a sockpuppet whose main account must be found. Also, the information from the user on Wikifa shows that he/she has not edited it for more than 5 months and it is clear that he/she is a sockpuppet account and I am not him/her sockpuppet account and no one else. Please accept my unlock request and return my articles Thank U ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ ^(Talk) 03:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi ABBAS K.CH! Thanks for reaching out to me. Have you been pointed to this SPI report? It will detail the investigation and what information that involved users in the investigation found. If you have any questions about this report, please let me know and I'll be happy to answer them and help you. :-) Best - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Yes, I read this and said in my explanation that I just took this article from SimpleWiki and moved it here and consciencly did not know anything about the adventures behind it. ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ ^(Talk) 04:48, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

ABBAS K.CH - Let me ping Spicy, who was the primary editor who conducted the investigation and compiled the evidence. Spicy, are you able to chime in, respond to this user, and address ABBAS K.CH's explanation here? :-) Thanks - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

As I explained in the SPI, the decision to block was based on the fact that they created an article that had been repeatedly recreated by sockpuppets, in a format identical to that of previous sockpuppet creations. It's up to the reviewing admin to decide whether or not the explanation of copying the article from simplewiki is convincing (note that the simplewiki article was also created by a sock). I had a look at the user's fawiki talk page and it's interesting. The admin reviewing their block stated (according to Google Translate) Although there is behavioral evidence that makes us suspect that you are sparing another user who was previously permanently cut off for violating Wikipedia policies, we decided to turn a blind eye to these similarities and call them "accidental." Anyway, it's in others' hands now. Spicy (talk) 05:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

@Oshwah and Spicy: Hi; Yes, that's why I filed a complaint on Wikifa because at least you recognized me as a Sockpuppet on enWiki based on a document (Hamid motahari article) and you acted within the rules defined in the Wiki and you There is no problem; But there, a manager without a degree, based on a duck test, recognized me as a sockpuppet, and unlike you, without a significant degree. He did not even speak on my talk page after this incident, so I complained to that manager at this address.

As for how I edited or template of my writing, it is clear that this means that Hamid Motahari's article was just a copy, because by looking at the previous articles and also on Wikifa, you can see that the script and editing template are all the same and its different from what it is in Hamid Motahari's article, even if you are careful, although I copied Hamid Motahari's article very quickly, I still changed a significant part of it, such as the information box or the contents of his coaching period, etc.Thank U ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ ^(Talk) 17:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Why My Account is Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ABBAS K.CH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi; What is really happening? I have to say with all due respect that this is a suspicious event. That's why I closed in Wikifa and 2 days after opening my account there, now I closed in enWiki for the same reason. In Wikifa I was accused of being a sockpuppet of user named Arian021hhh and here I was accused of being a sockpuppet of a user named M86r.

Accept reason:

Given a reasonable non-sockpuppetry for the only evidence presented at SPI, and significant diverging behaviour from m86r, this does not look like sockpuppetry to me. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

ABBAS K.CH (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@Sir Sputnik: Sincerely yours, I ask you to check.ABBAS K.CH (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Also, in connection with the accusation made against me through Hamid Motahari's article, I must say that I took this article from SimpleWiki and transferd it into English. Because it also had a Persian version and was in simple but not in English. I should also add that all the articles I have created have either been completely deleted or moved to the Draft space. Thank U ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ 07:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Another question I have is why did this happen all of a sudden? No warning, without a Notification that will make me defend myself and resolve the dispute. I'm a novice when I mistakenly used the Transfermarkt website twice as a source and you blocked me. How can such a user be a sockpuppet? ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ ^(Talk) 12:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@Sir Sputnik: Hi, I'm sorry, I'm busy with WikiFa during this time, and I've not been serious about unblocking myself because I'm sure the routine is going well, but it 's been a long time, but no one has responded to my unblocking request. please consider it. Thanks ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ ^(Talk) 20:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Obsolete font tags in your signature

Please fix your custom signature as shown in this edit. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player)

Hello, ABBAS K.CH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pouya Pourali (Football Player), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Captain

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Captain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 27#Template:Captain. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. S.A. Julio (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:2022–23 Hazfi Cup has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2022–23 Hazfi Cup. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 06:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Your signature and linter errors

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:ABBAS K.CH|<span style="color:Red;">'''ÆBBħ'''</span> <span style="color:#1E8FDC;">'''ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ'''</span>]] ([[User_talk:ABBAS K.CH|<sup style="color:Orange;">'''Talk'''</sup>]]) ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022–23 Hazfi Cup has been accepted

2022–23 Hazfi Cup, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 02:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022–23 Premier League table

Template:2022–23 Premier League table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Spike 'em (talk) 09:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

@Spike 'em: Hi, Please show me the talk page of this Consensus. Thank U ÆBBħ ĶÃVĪĂŇĮ (^Talk) 09:53, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arnau Comas

Hello, ABBAS K.CH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arnau Comas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arnau Comas

Hello, ABBAS K.CH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arnau Comas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:35, 3 January 2023 (UTC)