Welcome!

edit
Hello, ADDgrammar, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for recognizing the benefits of becoming a registered user, creating your user/talk page, and your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you need help, check out useful resources & Getting Help below, ask on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page & add {{Help me}}. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) after your text entry, or by clicking   if shown, in order to produce your username & date. Please always fill in edit summary field with a brief description of your article or talk page edits (optional when just adding your communications on talk pages).
You can practice in your personal sandbox (add {{My Sandbox|replace with your user name}} on your user page for future easy access) or your user page. Masssly —Sadat (Masssly)TCM 09:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Sadat (Masssly)TCM 09:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Avenue (web series) has been reverted.
Your edit here to The Avenue (web series) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/user/stephaneparereports‎) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 13:58, Monday, November 25, 2024 (UTC)

May 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Centenary State High School may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • homepage = http://www.centenaryshs.eq.edu.au|www.centenaryshs.eq.edu.au]|
  • * Sallyann Griffith (Deputy Principal, Junior Secretary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

This High School Has Closets

edit

I saw the request for help but I'm uncertain which person place that there. Here is the cache for the relist (reference) regarding Lambda finalists. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:U34mckk4md8J:storycarnivores.com/2013/03/09/lambda-literary-finalists-for-best-lgbt-young-adult-novels/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=firefox-a Does this help?Tews (talk) 09:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I just wrote an article about Beth E. Mooney, the CEO of KeyCorp, and one of only two women who run US banks valued at over $10 billion. ( I am just saying that so you know she is really wiki worthy.) I would like to put a picture of her up on the article, along with an infobox, but the whole copyright issue has made me crazy, and I am not at all sure even how to begin to get a picture that can legally go up on Wikipedia. I understand I need the permission of both the subject of the photo, ie Ms. Mooney, but I also need the explicit permission from the photographer, ie the copyright holder. This effort really seems beyond me. Can you help ease me through this process. It cant be that bad, there are tons of pictures of famous people on Wikipedia. How did they get there??

Thanks for your help.

Hi ADDgrammar. Famous people tend to be in public a fair bit, so the vast majority of our images of such people are simply taken by Wikipedia contributors (in most jurisdictions, the subject's consent to publication is unnecessary so long as they are in a public place when photographed). In some cases, PR companies donate their copyrighted materials to Wikipedia by re-licensing them under the CC-BY-SA licence, but generally speaking it's down to individual users taking snaps of their favourite celebrities (this is why so many Wikipedia images of famous people are taken at award ceremonies, premiers or conventions).
My suggestion (assuming that Ms Mooney isn't sufficiently local to you that you can get a picture of her down the local shops) would be to contact her PR representatives and see whether they would be willing to release an image under a licence that Wikipedia can use. You will need to get them to email the image to permissions-en@wikimedia.org  along with an email using the wording found here, and the email will need to come from thier official email address. For more information, you can point them at this page. Hope that helps. Yunshui  10:03, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disclosure required

edit

Since October 2014, you have almost exclusively created or greatly expanded articles and drafts on many businesspeople and businesses, including the following.

This might lead an editor to conclude you have some kind of undisclosed financial connection to these entities. If you do, you must disclose the connection under Wikipedia's Terms of Service as described at WP:COI. — Brianhe (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Brianhe, and any other editor with a similar concern for my understanding of COI, Thanks for the heads up concerning my edits since October. I want to reassure the Wikipedia community that I have no connection to any of the people I have written about in the list above, and they have no connection to each other. I simply enjoy writing bios, and I have found my subject matter in a number of way. In some cases I read about an interesting person in the news and went to look him/her up on Wikipedia, and to my surprise (and happiness) that person was not already there, so I had a chance to write my own wiki about him/her. In other cases I looked at lists of people I found in Wikipedia and saw names that did not have wiki links. Again I saw this as my chance to create a new article. I tried to have a NPOV when writing, and based all my information on what I could find in articles from respected sources. But if you think it does not look good for me to focus so sharply on individual bios, I will make a concerted effort to find additional subjects of interest to write about. ADDgrammar (talk) 07:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Steve Rasmussen

edit
 

The article Steve Rasmussen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails notability requirements in WP:BIO. Local business roundtables/halls of fame don't rise to substantial coverage, nor routine executive directory listing at Bloomberg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 03:53, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Categories

edit

Can you ensure that the categories that you add to new articles follow the procedures set out at WP:CAT. Articles should be in the mast appropriate category. THanks. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:13, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Yes, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.209.225.167 (talk) 05:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Radley

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Paul Radley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Vallentyne

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Vallentyne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of John J. Magnuson

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John J. Magnuson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Agnes Zurowski

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Agnes Zurowski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Elma Steck

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Elma Steck, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lillian Hlavaty

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lillian Hlavaty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosemary Stevenson

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosemary Stevenson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Helen Waddell (baseball)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Helen Waddell (baseball), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of WyzAnt for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WyzAnt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WyzAnt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Charles Szews for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles Szews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Szews until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 01:33, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gregory A. Sandfort for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gregory A. Sandfort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory A. Sandfort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:27, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wonky Donkey for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wonky Donkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonky Donkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of This High School Has Closets

edit
 

The article This High School Has Closets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable book-- nominated for an award, did not win

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 23:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of G. Steven Farris for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G. Steven Farris is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Steven Farris until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of WyzAnt for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WyzAnt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WyzAnt (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk   23:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:WyzAnt Logo.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:WyzAnt Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply