AKiwiDeerPin1

September 2023

Please do not remove the {{copyvio/core}} template from articles, as you did with Order of precedence in Bangladesh. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:Order of precedence in Bangladesh/Temp. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators and/or removers of the copyright notice templates will be blocked from editing.

The notice you removed instructs editors not to restore or edit the blanked content until the issue is resolved by an administrator, copyright clerk, or VRT agent, and it links to this guidance on how to supply evidence of non-infringement (which also reiterates that editors providing evidence or rewriting articles should not remove {{copyvio}} tags).

Additionally, you marked your edit as minor, but "minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia and reverting a page is rarely considered minor (with the exception of blatant vandalism). AKiwiDeerPin (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it appears to impersonate another Wikipedia user. Users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is other disruptive behavior ever allowed. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. For best results, please read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 01:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)