User talk:AUTTPEditor

Your submission at Articles for creation: Windows 99 (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

Implausible disambig

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Windows 99 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 09:37, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, AUTTPEditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 09:37, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Windows Three Point One

A tag has been placed on Windows Three Point One requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sugar Tax (talk) 09:23, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

what Is the reason behind your username

u better not be a member of the uttp ~2026-15099-4 (talk) 07:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your comment at BFDI

The answer is no. BFDI has only recently become notable, some time after the movie stuff. Before that point, there was no in depth coverage from reliable sources on BFDI, therefore cutting it under the standards of WP:GNG. Viva la horde, ~ GoatLordServant^(Talk) 17:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Geoffrey the Giraffe has been accepted

Geoffrey the Giraffe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 13:28, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For the excellent new Geoffrey the Giraffe article. Childhood character of mine I got a figure of before my local store closed down all those years ago. Thank you! Viva la horde, ~ GoatLordServant(Talk) 14:16, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, AUTTPEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ 14:34, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Windows 99

Hello, AUTTPEditor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Windows 99, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Windows 99

Hello, AUTTPEditor. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Windows 99".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Australia who passed Online Safety Law created attention globally

Despite US states passes age verify law in 2022 and 2023 such KOSA, UK passes Online Safety Act in October 2023, and EU's Digital Service Act by since 2022, they were rarely enforced and ignored and not stronger until Australia's social media ban announce came by 28 November 2024, it's not by book itself, it was Albanese speech, and any countries who use social media bans uses Australia, not UK, so I already put even if UK or US states passes, fails and not enforced until Australia changed, could you let me to remove it since I moved into down part, thank you SeriousTuber (talk) 20:30, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

First of all, it wasn't just an Australia thing. Plus, remember, the UK Online Safety Act 2023 actually both went into effect and passed before Australia's law did (UK OSA was in October 2023 and went into effect in July 2025, Australia's SMMA was passed in November 2024 and went into effect in December 2024) so I also say the UK OSA is a factor as it gained attention first prior to Australia's.

And you need to realize, The Anxious Generation influenced Australia's social media ban as well as many other age verification laws, so I do agree it's a major factor too. I think the UK OSA and TAG are both major factors to age verification, but I agree that Australia's social media ban was still a major factor, just not the primary one. AUTTPEditor (talk) 12:01, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Agreed. BaldiBasicsFan (talk) 20:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Murder of Kiaya Campbell

Hello, AUTTPEditor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Murder of Kiaya Campbell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of moral panics

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of moral panics, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names, or the name of the newspaper or organisation, instead of the source's actual author or editor name. If no human author is given, the fields should be removed. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • web-editor (2011-10-27). "Moral panic about overpopulation: the distracting campaign of Population Matters". Radical Statistics Group. Retrieved 2026-08-20. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:27, 20 August 2026 (UTC)