Welcome!

edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Doug Weller talk 08:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Mian Channu are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 08:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ahmadiyya by country, you may be blocked from editing. Editors are not allowed to determine what faith a group of people belong to. I know all about the issues about these people and the fact that some other Muslims think they should be killed, but none of that changes the fact that on Wikipedia if a group says they belong to one religion we don't deny that. Doug Weller talk 08:59, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

first of all I'll follow up Wikipedia rules. secondly if someone thinks he knows everything then in my opinion in general he is nothing more than a stupid person on earth. Now as you mentioned some Muslims want them to be killed the grow up kid. i can prove you wrong on it because I'm not ill minded to label a specific group to be killers not even hindu, Muslims or Christian. Please correct words next time..sorry once again #Peace Abbaslhr (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not labelling a group at all. But see Orya Maqbool Jan which ran into yesterday. And "all about" is a figure of speech, it never occurred to me anyone would take that literally. I mean I have read Persecution of Ahmadis so I'm aware of their problems. Please don't tell me no one has ever murdered them (or in fact people of any religion, there's a lot of religious hatred in the world). Doug Weller talk 09:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive behaviour. It appears you are purposefully harassing another editor. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on User talk:Doug Weller, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 11:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you look at my user page you'll learn a bit more about me. I'm not trying to make your life miserable, I'm trying to make you a better editor. Policy states that "Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done carefully, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles." Doug Weller talk 11:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Wikaviani you are harassing me and i have no intention to harass anyone and never did before. Doug Weller reverts my edits on other article except this one. i simply asked him that i didn't like it and its not the way if we have different views. BUT you guys have rules to threat me again and again?

I edit one word in a article and in return someone wrote " I know all about the issues about these people and the fact that some other Muslims think they should be killed, but none of that changes the fact that on Wikipedia if a group says they belong to one religion we don't deny that."

how can you consider my religion?

Where is this written that Wikipedia decide how many religion are on earth and who belongs to him? Can you provide me reference here that Wikipedia accept claims of a group and support it?

Please i have no issues that you reverts my edits. i TRUST he did it based on rules and i supprt his action on this article.

but i cannot accepts your disrespectful behavior and please be respectful in next reply. Doug Weller have already replied me about his intention regarding second article he edited (Mian Channu) that is a reasonable excuse to accept. All Good. Abbaslhr (talk) 12:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

You are not being harassed. You were told that your comments do not help build a good working environment and that such behavior gets people blocked. You've now failed to assume that the warning was in good faith, not helpful. I have no idea what "how can you consider my religion?" means. Wikipedia does not attempt to decide how many religions belong, but we do not tell a group that says they belong to a certain religion that they do not. There is a group called the Latter Day Saint Movement which considers themselves Christians and we will stop anyone who tries to make them look as though they are not, which is probably most Christians as their beliefs are as different as the ones that have led the Ahmadis to be persecuted. Doug Weller talk 13:58, 14 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Next Cola

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Next Cola, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply