Abhisihn

October 2017

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 00:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hi, Abhisihn. I'm repeating the reply I've just given you at Talk:Yadav, to make sure you see it. Your comments were deleted because talkpages are not forums or soapboxes. Please avoid posting nationalist ramblings on Wikipedia talkpages, as you did here. The Yadav talkpage is for discussing improvements to the Yadav article, it's not a forum or soapbox for general discussion of the article's subject. Wikipedia articles go by reliable sources, not by your or anybody's religious beliefs. Don't make legal threats ("You can be taken to court for this") and don't post accusations of bad-faith editing ("Have you been paid to write derogatory articles on Yadavs?"). Also note that people of all nationalities are equally entitled to edit all articles. A European can edit an Indian article (it's not their nationality that matters, but whether they have knowledge of the subject), you can edit an American article, and so on. Editors' nationalities aren't in fact your business; comment on edits, not editors. Don't try to elicit Sitush's real name, as in "Sitush - What;'s your real and name and which office do you work from??"[1]) It's rude and inappropriate and not your business. Please try to adjust to policies and customs here, such as WP:CIVILITY, WP:No personal attacks and WP:Assume good faith, or you may be blocked from editing. Bishonen | talk 23:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC).

Hey! tell me when I didn't violate any rules of Wikipedia why wasn't I being allowed to edit? Why was I showed the door without an opportunity?? Why are you purposely not allowing me to edit this? or in fact anyone to edit this! I have taken screen shots of the all the page talk, and your editors deleted their comments, because they weren't following the rules of Wikipedia or else why would they delete their own comments? Their comments were proof enough on how they have vandalized this article.. Now if you are really a just person , tell me how to edit this article? This was my first question and posted today and this will be my last! after this no more discussions! Only Legal Notice ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhisihn (talk • contribs) 00:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

I moved the above comment because it was added (diff) inside the above notice. Please examine WP:NLT. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Yadav

I removed the text you added at Talk:Yadav because article talk pages are a place for calm discussion of actionable proposals to improve the article. People at other websites engage in indignant rants but they are not helpful at Wikipedia. If you have a suggestion for text that should be added to the article, or text that should be changed or removed, please add a new section with a brief explanation of the proposal. See WP:RS for the fact that reliable sources would be needed to support changes. Ask at WP:HELPDESK regarding procedures. Someone there would explain that an article talk page must not be used to attack other editors (diff), and should not be used for long rants. Johnuniq (talk) 02:17, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

I will try one last time to solve this here

I will try one last time to solve this here !! I hope the new Editors will not deviate from the topic by replying with absurd comments..

I have removed your latest comment at Talk:Yadav because - yet again - it is just your opinion. If you are going to make statements like that then you need to argue them in a manner that suggests they could be an improvement to the article and you need to provide reliable sources to substantiate your point(s). - Sitush (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Sitush is vandalizing this article

It's pretty evident that Sitush wants to divide North Indian Yadavs and South Indians Yadavs by promoting a fictitious theory that Yadav and Yadava are two separate terms, but he doesn't have Vedic and Puranic Sources where he can state that Yadav were only mentioned as यादवा and not यादव. He has hijacked this page without furnishing enough proofs or reliable sources. The theory of reliable sources should be applied not only to the users but also editors. This thing will be brought up in front of the Management of Wikipedia..If यदु is not related to यादव then how come it becomes synonymous with यादवा .

I am sure that the Wikipedia Management will bring justice to this article, and if non-elite employees such as Sitush think that the Management is not going to penalize them or fire them then let him know.. We always have the court and its evident that Sitush is an Indian residing in India, because there is no reason why a foreigner will rally against the Yadav history. Foreigners have taken huge interest in the history of Yadavs because of the Aryan nature of Yadavs, Foreigners & PhD Scholars from US to Europe to Japan come down to India to study about Yadavs, this itself speaks about the magnitude of the Yadavs ... Sitush is trying to separate the present Yadavs from the ancestor of Yadavs by promoting a fairy tale that Yadav and Yadava are two different terms, such evil acts will not be pardoned. I am sure he belongs to that specific Hindu caste which is looked down by majority of the Hindus. It will be fun if Management doesn't take any action against him and his team who have rigged this article because then we would send a legal notice to the offices of Wikipedia in US,UK & India. I am sure the Attorneys will definitely pay attention to the legal costs and the rigged nature of this article! Even if they don't, it will still be better for us because then we will drag Sitush to the courts of Delhi and issue press releases stating the caste he belongs to and how he vandalized this Article!

You can continue thinking that you own Wikipedia until the 200 Million strong Yadav family teaches you the lesson of life and black lists you in the files of every MNC. You have insulted the beliefs and culture of all Yadavs and that is enough for all the Courts to decide your ill fate !

And don't even think for a minute that just because you deleted all the comments & notes from the TALK page, we won't have a copy, We got Google and it indexes & crawls each and every page of Wikipedia, and the Cache is enough to prove how you all deleted the comments which proved that this article was compromised, notes which proved what the PhD scholars have actually spoken about Yadavs and how their research work was tweaked by the editors.

I am done with your bull shit replies, I never used the word request because I am not one of those users who will keep "REQUESTING" you, maybe those users don't know their Rights, the LAWS of US,UK,INDIA, or maybe they don't have the time.. but I have enough resources & lawyers to fix this!

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for legal threats, personal attacks and incomprehension in the face of warnings and advice.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | talk 20:03, 2 October 2017 (UTC)