Welcome!

edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Eudokia Makrembolitissa , may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I respect your opinion and think it make sense.thank you. Yswj700 (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
thank you Acolex2 (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries, please

edit

  Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. Eric talk 12:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! M.Bitton (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sancha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sancha of Castile. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Octavia never ascended the throne as empress; she only held power and influenced the appointment of emperors. There is no evidence or ruins. Sufficient evidence has been presented. History must be based on objective facts. In the utterly unreliable Historia Augusta, written in line with the Greek Thirty,No history book, relic, or relic has ever listed Octavia as an empress. History should be proved by objective facts, not hypotheses. Yswj700 (talk) 12:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Let's talke at the page Talk:Victoria (Gallic Empire) Acolex2 (talk) 13:00, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 18:44, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empress of Japan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jotei.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric talk 03:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tulun Beg Khanum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)Reply