User talk:Adambro/Archive 12

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Peace dove

Cirt (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers! Cirt (talk) 04:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

---

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Adambro, I wanted to stop by your talk page and apologize for my recent conduct related to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Fox News – White House controversy. I got a bit carried away about the whole editing comments thing, and I took it too far. You had the right idea, and in the end the idea by another admin to instead suggest to me to collapse them worked out well. I value your contributions on the project, and again express that I'm sorry about this recent exchange. I truly hope we can again interact politely with each other in the future to work positively and constructively to improve the project. Cirt (talk) 04:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

AfD query

Would it be alright with you if I collapsed the back-and-forth exchange at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Fox News – White House controversy that we had, as I had done similarly with my source list? Cirt (talk) 18:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

I'd have no problem with that. Thanks for your other messages by the way. I wasn't ignoring them, I just wanted to leave responding till I had more time. Regards. Adambro (talk) 18:40, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

You are most welcome, sigh, and thanks for responding! :) Cirt (talk) 18:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Oldham Loop Metrolink stations

Thank you for your suggestions for the Oldham Loop Metrolink stations. I think you might be right in that the stations being converted should link to the original railway station sites, but I would prefer to keep the pages about the new stations.

OTRS permission

Hello user:Adambro,

I am a relatively new Wikipedia user and successfully uploaded File:MO_Bangkok_exterior.jpg with the cc-by-sa-3.0 tag. The file was later marked for deletion because there was no proof that "the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license." I represent the copyright holders of this image and therefore believe I should be able to apply this tag and upload the photo to Wikipedia. I sent an email to permissions-en-at-wikimedia.org and received a ticket # (2009102310039971). I applied the OTRS tag with ticket number to the image and yet again it has been flagged for deletion. Can you please help? Any advice would be most appreciated.

Thank you so much, Brandopedia (talk • contribs) 20:32, 2 November 2009

Scott Mills

Moved to here. Adambro (talk) 16:49, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Chris Moyles

I reverted the changes. My colleagues didn't believe me Chris Moyles was 29 ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.106.151.154 (talk) 13:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Somerset3d

Hello,

I am The Captain and you recently left a message asking of my connection to the website Somerset3d.

I am the webmaster and photographer for this website. I place links to the village I have featured via the Wikipedia page for that same village. The idea is that if people are interested in information on a village I thought they would be interested in seeing photographs of said village.

The website is a non-profit-making website and free to view.

My plan is to record all of the towns and villages in Somerset in 3d.

3d is on the up at the moment so I'm also pandering to those intersted in 3d.

My statistics show that a good number of visitors come to my website via Wikipedia. I also make use of Wikipedia myself in that when I feature a village I put notes about the village's history and link key names and events from the article back to Wikipedia.

I see it as a two way thing.

I hope this all makes sense.

Regards,

Alan Woollard (The Captain) Somerset3d —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Captain (talk • contribs) 15:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Category:Railway stations served by East Coast (train operating company)

• Yes thats fine. Likelife (talk) 08:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Pencil Full of Lead

On the template I deleted it said the result was "keep", which I thought meant that the article won't be deleted, forgive me for my error. Is there any way of getting the template removed more quickly, because the article is clearly now at a much more advanced stage? Thanks Kitchen roll (talk) 14:16, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

AdambroBot edits

Hi, re this edit - I'm puzzled by the insertion of the comma above the categories - what is its purpose? --Redrose64 (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi there Redrose64. It seems that the comma was actually there to begin with ({{SouthEastEngland-railstation-stub}},) and just managed to end up on its own line when the stub template was moved. Regards. Adambro (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Surprise for you!

Hello, Adambro. You have new messages at talk:November 2009 Great Britain and Ireland floods.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mjroots (talk) 09:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

British Rail Class 321

Hi there, someone on Wikipedia seems to think that it is the right thing to enter the wrong build dates for the British Rail Class 321 Electric Multiple Unit trains. They state incorrectly that these trains were built during the period of 1986-89. This cannot be possible, as during this time, British Rail were building the Class 317/2 Electric Multiple Units (1985-87) and Class 319/0 Electric Multiple Units (1987-88).

The correct build dates for the Class 321 are as follows:

• Class 321/3 were built 1988-90
• Class 321/4 were built 1989-90
• Class 321/9 were built 1991

I also include a reference, it is The Railway Centre 'Technical Data' <http://www.therailwaycentre.com/New%20EMU%20Tech%20Data/EMU_321.html>

Please can you ensure that no-one inputs the incorrect date?

I am unsure who is entering the wrong dates.

Thanking you in advance.

--Peter Skuce (talk) 09:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

All the info was taken from a removed section in the Talk:DB Schenker Rail (UK) page

It was removed by some IP Address user, and I re-added it because A. someone had flagged that it need expansion, B. Just about every other TOC. has a list of the equipment they operate, So That's the best I can do for the moment I see if a few websites I know of have any information (though their modeling websites and the most useful stops at about class 67, and don't recall where it stops relating to Electrics.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 01:13, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Alliance Rail

Moved to User talk:Fizzycreative. Adambro (talk) 15:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

• Well I also know that it does take quite some time for rail services to start, so I would leave the pages unless the service has been cancelled. Also I can't see you the Manger at Alliance Rail would just make this up, so I would just waite until something else comes up about the GNER and GNWR services. Likelife (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

  Please leave your comments at the deletion request. Thanks. Adambro (talk) 16:01, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I have supported this deletion; multiple rationale: See deletion debate.--Kudpung (talk) 00:16, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

OTRS request

When you have a moment, could you please verify that this ticket is valid and that it deals with this image? Thank you.--Rockfang (talk) 02:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes it does, the ticket looks satisfactory. Regards. Adambro (talk) 13:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

you've been mentioned in an arbcom case

please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tothwolf/Evidence#Bizarre_behavior_by_JBSupreme.2C_Adambro.2C_and_Miami33139

Theserialcomma (talk) 18:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Adambro (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

deleting pages

Hi!

I have a question about deleting pages and reaching consensus. I have nominated an article to be deleted but the editors who participate in the discussions are very partial and push hard to promote their own political viewpoints, how can I get neutral parties in the discussion? And who has the final words about articles being deleted or not?

Danz23 (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Editing

History of terrorism does need to be ended with this you know what i mean ?

{{terrorism}}

Question

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.75
Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs
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=O5kp
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

Is this encrypted using my key? Adambro (talk) 13:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes :) -- Avi (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Well? -- Avi (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't able to figure out how to decrypt it. I don't use PGP much. Did you use the key from here? Sorry about this. Adambro (talk) 17:26, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes. That actually is what the message is about Decrypted content below:

Adam, there seems to be something wrong with your GPG public key as it is sitting on your page. I am taking your key from the Pramberger.AT server. Can you check it, please?

Thanks,

-- Avi

-- Avi (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Ahh. I lost the private key for my previous public key unfortunately, hence why I created a new key. I've added the new key to Pramberger.AT now. Regards. Adambro (talk) 13:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)