User talk:Addshore/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome!

Hello, Addshore, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Razorflame (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 21:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem mate. Just doing my job. Well i suppose it isnt my job. Ahh well glad you liked my work. Hardly work just pushing a few buttons. Addshore (talk) 12:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Province of New York

Why are you removing my edits to History of New York and marking them as vandalism? I think you are mistaken. BradMajors (talk) 18:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

You just removed a lot of the article. You did say "(→New Netherlands - content merged into New York article)" but i could not see any of it. All i saw was a big bit of the article missing. I have now had a look and it looks like you have now added your extra information as 1000 bytes + were added. Maybe next time do the changes in one big edit or make a notice saying that "you will finish the article shortly". I am sorry for any inconvenience caused. Addshore (talk) 18:16, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

HOW DARE YOU DELEATYE MY ACCURATE STATNMEBT

GO TO HELL —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corrado 72 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

I replyed to this on his page :) Talk:Corrado 72

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the abuse from Aunclejimmyjames; he's on his way to indef-blocked, I think. Acroterion _(talk) 20:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

No problem.. :) Its good to see people appreciate it. Addshore 09:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello deyar firiend

im nev here im help im sorry i make a mistake no vandal im help im a greek friend im reporter sorry if i make mistke.daşşakkürler bay bay —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hacii (talk • contribs) 19:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

No Problem. If you ever need any help just askAddshore (talk) 22:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

corrected my vandalism

Wow, you corrected my vandalism really really really quickly. How do you do that? Kudos. And happy birthday for tomorrow. 81.159.121.203 (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Ty about my bday :). I use a few programs and also irc feed from freenode.Addshore (talk) 22:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Ah, the reflex deletionists ...

Evidently, Addshore is a fast-acting automatic deletionist, with little prompting or reason. Sigh. He/she/it just deleted the standard, canonical Leiston-accent greeting for no apparent reason. Wikipedia was more fun before this lot took over. With this current style of "hall monitor" behaviour, most Wikipedia articles could never been written in the first place. 66.93.216.22 (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I am no bot. I am real. Also i didn't delete anything i just reverted it as i saw this. "Ay wotyaDOONen bwee?" I am only human but i thought this needed to be reverted. Addshore (talk) 00:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The best kind of userpage vandalism...

Is the kind you don't find out about until you check your userpage's edit history, so thank you for these reverts! -- saberwyn 06:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Sometimes i don't really notice what i revert but it is really nice to hear people saying thanks. Addshore (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting vandalism

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page! I really didn't know someone was taking care of that too!

Welt^anschaunng has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Welt^anschaunng 11:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the love welt. I try to get rid of all vandalism that i see. Just happened that it was your page. Its really nice to hear people saying thanks. Addshore (talk) 16:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

good work

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Your antivandalism efforts have not gone unnoticed. I've seen you appear on a lot of my article history pages. A small thanks for your effort. -- penubag  (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow thanks penubag. Thats my first barnstar. I am really grateful. Addshore (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Invite

Century Tower

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Florida, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of University of Florida. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks!

Jccort (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry but i don't actually have anything to do with the University of Florida. I don't even live in America so i don't know much about it. I did revert some of the vandalism on the page and i will continue to do so if i see any. Addshore (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

unconstructive edit to the John Hawkins article?

Can you please explain why having a "link" to afterdeck (poop) is preferable to having a link to afterdeck (poop) in the John Hawkins article? In my edit I left a comments that read "link to Poop deck article" which you apparently think was not informative enough. Red links to non-existent pages are things that some people are trying to lessen on Wikipedia. Why have you reverted a constructive contribution toward that goal? 164.55.254.106 (talk) 17:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I am very sorry. You can 100% blame me for that. I do alot of reverting from vandalism but i do make mistakes. I think the reason that i reverted this was because i saw "poop", also it was from an ip address not from a user account. This is also not the first time you have been warned but i will remove my warning to you also. Please consider creating an account.Addshore (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Well deserved

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For excellent work with the huggle tool and excellent clue and judgement being displayed throughout your time here on en.wp. :) Rudget. 18:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

I have to say thanks Rudget. Now my second barnstar. Addshore (talk) 16:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

In a random click to your user page, I see by your userboxes that it is your birthday today - Happy Birthday!!!!

Thanks mate :) It has been a good day for me.. Addshore (talk) 23:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Not vandalism

I am not vandalising the pages I am editing, I am avoiding the redirect "...On the Radio (Remember the Days)" by making the links read "Shit on the Radio (Remember the Days)", the ACTUAL name of the song. If you were a fan of Nelly Furtado, you would know that. 210.50.189.12 (talk) 08:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. Im sorry i reverted that but i see it has already been put right. I do alot of reverting against vandalism and that is one of the main things that i look for. I see you have already removed the warning I gave you and reverted the edit so all I can say is sorry and I will try to be more carefull in the future. Also thanks for reporting this to me and not just reverting my edits. Also can i suggest that you make an account on wiki so you use your account name instead of ip address.Addshore (talk) 09:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

yy cant i vandalize

yy cant i vandalize —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iversonwuzhere (talk • contribs) 16:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

When you say "yy cant i vandalize" i am guessing that you mean Why cant i vandalise the wiki. If this is your question then my reply is simple. Because it is against the rules. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia for everyone to benefit from, those that try to mess that up will be blocked. Addshore (talk) 16:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

MK Dons article

What I wrote is not vandalism. Its completly true. The MK Dons have only existed as a franchise team since 2004 and i was putting the truth. you cant ignore your past.

Hi there. I consider this "There fans are not fans but trators. Lets hope they all burn." to be attacking people and therefor also vandalism. This is the reason that i reverted your edit and although this may be your point of view it is attacking people. Addshore (talk) 16:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

it wasnt vandalism

check out yahoo news. The college really is in lockdown, and I want to help people be aware of the situation —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.191.153.85 (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry wiki isnt for news :) thats wikinews. Please add some reliable sources and it can say Rjd0060. Also please sine your comments on peoples talk pages by typing ~~~~ after your commentAddshore (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Dearest Addshore...

Dearest Addshore, I am unsure as to what your motives for denying my annotations appear to be. I simply am attempting to educate the scholarly inquiring minds of the general populous of the factual nature of the cunning beast that is the Unicorn. If you are perhaps skeptical of my findings, I urge you, with the most sincerity, to study the works of renowned German Unicorn historian Johann von Schplinkterfaltzen. His famed documentation in The Unicorn that Totally Existed (1937. Vultinschroeder Press, Munich.) is an illuminating insight into the mind of the wonderous Unicorn, showing that they indeed walked among us. I am sure that as a fellow Unicorn scholar, you will indeed observe the merit of his writings and thus better appreciate my own. My most heartfelt apologies for not including the citation in my revision - for it was simply absent from my mind at the time.

   Sincerely,
   Hanz Leichtenstein, Ph.D. (Carguy85TA)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carguy85TA (talk • contribs) 07:57, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 

I am sorry if this is what you think but at the time in my eyes this was vandalism. Also i have to say that doing this to my warnings [1]. This is not very nice and could cause you to get warned again. Also please DO NOT vandalise my talk page. If i see you vandalising anything else i will report you to the administrators and see if you get blocked. Do not change what other people have said here as it is what they have a said and not what you have said. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 13:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I just got some message from you about editing Leiston. I never edited Leiston, since I've never heard of it before, so you may have sent it to the wrong person. Just wanted to let you know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.93.216.22 (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. If you got a message from me saying that then your account did edit the article. There is probably someone else also using your account / ip / computer. Can i suggest that you make your own wikipedia account to get rid of messages like this. also when you add a comment to a talk page please sign at the end by typing ~~~~. Thank you. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandal?? I admit it

Damn, do you admins have an alerter? that was one fast edit. Anyway, not to split hairs, but my second Math edit wasn't vandalism.

My first edit to Mathematics ("Math sucks", positioned at the very beginning of the paragraph) WAS vandalism, as many people don't think it sucks and I do admit it was an unfounded argument.

My second edit to Mathematics ("Many people hate math", positioned at the END of the paragraph) was not vandalism but merely a stated opinion. Many people DO hate math. Not ALL, not MOST, just MANY. Many people LOVE math as well.

Therefore, I will continue to add "Many people hate math" to the end of the paragraph. Your efforts and everyone else's to remove it constitute vandalism, because all I am doing is stating an opinion that happens to be true.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 5150pacer (talk • contribs)

Hi there. Yes your first one was vandalism and im my eyes your second one was also vandalism. I asked another guy and he says he doesn't think that it is. I am sorry anout that revert then. I will also remove the warning i gave you for that edit. Also i suggest that you move the sentence into another section of the article where it fits in more rather than just at the bottom. Also can you please sign your comments on this page by adding ~~~~ after your comment. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your many reversions and expert use of Huggle to combat vandalism. Thingg⊕⊗ 18:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Wow! thanks mate. 3rd now ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:18, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

RE: Thanks

No problem at all! If you need any more help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page! --The Helpful One ^(Review) 18:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The Helpful One ^(Review) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Woo another smile. Thanks the helpfulone :D. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for warning 163.153.154.69's user talk page. The district has reported that they have located the students involved, and are taking appropriate action. --NERIC-Security (talk) 19:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Im just helpign wiki im my own little world. Or something like that. Thanks for saying thanks, its really nice to hear it from people. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

My apologies!!!

Hi...I'm sorry about the edits. I got up from my computer for a moment and my friend thought it was funny to vandalize. I'm really sorry and it won't happen again!128.84.16.65 (talk) 19:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem but try to tell him not to. Can i suggest that you make a password protected account by clicking on the link (top right) then you can log in and out and you will not get blamed for other peoples vandalism. At the moment you are only identified by your IP address. Hope this helps and if you ever need any help in the future feel free to post again on this page. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:41, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Gerard James Borg

Would you please kindly explain your reverting my edit without even bothering to give a reason. The edit took me a while. Firstly, there is the use of the second person pronoun in the second sentence which is not allowed. Secondly, there was a complete misuse of bold face throughout the article. Titles (including songs) are wrtitten in italics. Thirdly, the right to the Eurovision videos on YOuTube belong to the television comapanies they were recorded from and may not be directly linked to from Wikipedia. RSVP TINYMARK 20:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I am very sorry about this revert. I am 100% against vandalism and i am very sorry that i accidently reverted your edit. I see that you have already switched the edit back to how you had it. The only thing i can say is sorry and i hope that this does not happen again. I have also removed the warning from the user that made the edit. If you have any other concerns then please past them here. Also thanks for reporting my error, I do try not to make errors but i am only human. I would say i avarage at about 10 edits per minute sometimes going up to over 15. I get alot done but sometimes my human mind slips. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

No worries! I sometime get irate messages when I f** up ;-) TINYMARK 20:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

As you can tell from my talk page so do i ^^ ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Betty Boo?

I've noticed that lately that on 100 Greatest Cartoons everyone's been changing Betty Boop to Betty Boo (a english songwriter apparently).

If Betty Boop is the correct spelling why revert my edit? 78.133.60.23 (talk) 18:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. Firstly thanks for reporting this to me, I am only human and i do make mistakes. I have undone my revert and the article now stands as you had submitted it. I am sorry for my error and i will try to be more carefull with things like this especially on this page again. Also can i suggest to you that you sign in or make an account by clicking on the link top right. I have also removed the warning i added to your talk page to help stop confusion. If you ever need any help in the future please just ask here. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome and quick answer to my question. 78.133.60.23 (talk) 18:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. If i make a mistake i am usually active after it. Again i am sorry for my mistake. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Mewthree

When a page is blanked it's usually vandalism and the right thing to do is revert it; but it's worth looking at the history first, because sometimes, as with Mewthree just now, the author has blanked his own page (in this case because I had given it a PROD and, I guess, he realised it was not a useful page). In that case the thing to do is to put a {{db-author}} tag on, which asks for a speedy G7 "author requests deletion or has blanked the page". Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I am sorry for my error and yes normally pages that get blanked are usually vandalism. I am guessing that he himself did not add the {{db-author}} tag or i would not have reverted it. In future i will try to look more carefully at the article and try to stop this mistake happening again. Thanks for telling me my error as that is the only way i can fix / stop things like this from happening. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I think he was a newbie - I doubt if he knew about subtleties like {{db-author}}. There can be problems when a user realises his page is a mistake, blanks it, and next thing an accusation of vandalism for blanking it crashes down on him and he finds it reverted. Hey, that {{talkback}} template is nifty! I haven't seen it before and could definitely use it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yep the talk back template is useful. As i don't know / can't find out who made the page now and who i therefor warned for the blanking is there any chance that if you know you can removing my warning on him? If you or he already hasn't. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

It was RoyousOccasion (talk · contribs), but it's OK - you didn't warn him. If you had, I would have explained to him, but it wasn't necessary. Cheers, JohnCD (talk) 19:09, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks mate. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

new entry in wikipedia

I saw a company, Accupax, in a magazine and as the son of a elder parent who takes medication, I feel AccuPax should have its own page to inform seniors of how it can help them and to explain and bring to light the issues in our country on non-compliance medication issues. I was just wondering if i could make a page on accupax that defines it, what it does, and the reasons for it, and how it can save lives... and maybe like a testimonial page for current accupax users.. or something like this—Preceding unsigned comment added by Agarrettis (talk • contribs)

Hi there Agarrettis. Firstly when you comment on a talk page can you please add ~~~~ after your message to sign your comment so that the reader knows who it is from. Regarding your article on Accupax. If you want to create this page then you can by going here and then adding what you think should be on the article in the box and saving your changes. This would be recreating a page that has been deleted once under the G:11 act of Blatant advertising. If you think that you can make the article without Blatant advertising and make it a good article then go ahead. If you need any help on the article just ask here. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

welcome

thanks for the welcome! Al-Ghazzālī (talk) 19:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I try to welcome as many people as i can to Wikipedia. If you ever think i can help you post here. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

welcome

Thanks for the weldome Addshore...I had to change my Username from Username:HitlerFollower because it was unappropriate...Thanks anyways!!TheLightElf (talk) 19:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey. Yeh that name was a bit bad. Thanks for saying thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Lol, no problem..hehe..Do you like this one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheLightElf (talk • contribs) 19:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes that name is good. Also just a tip when you comment on a talk page add ~~~~ after your name so that you sign your comment. Like i do at the end of my comments. Happy editing. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

thanks

thanks, i appreciate the feedback ! --Agarrettis (talk) 19:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

No problem and glad i could help. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not unconstructive

It was vandalism. the edit summary was wrong. You need proof. I have hypertension(?) at this moment. And the vandalsim was coming from an IP address. Go ask another Filipino Wikipedian to back me up in case. AND YOU'RE NOT READING MY NOTE AT THE TOP OF MY TALK PAGE (no prefabricated user warning messages)! Please justify your reverts, actions, etc. on my talk page instead of that message!! -iaNLOPEZ1115 · TaLKBaCK · Vandalize it 07:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I cannot justify my reverts. I made a mistake as i am only human. I have already righted my wrongs. I have removed your warning and also undone my edit on the article. I am sorry for my error and hope it hasn't wasted your time. Also i am afraid i did not see your message on the top of your talk page. Also i try to respond to all of messages here so i will just add a template to your talk page about this new message. Again i am sorry.·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

It's okay. I did my job and you did yours. Now back to the saltmine for both of us (hehe). -iaNLOPEZ1115 · TaLKBaCK · Vandalize it 06:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

As i said i will try to be more car full, Really i revert too much vandalism. You could almost call me a human bot :D. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...

		The PCHS-NJROTC Abuse Report and Antivandal Barnstar
		For reverting vandalism to Port Charlotte High School!

GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 00:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Just like to say thanks for the barnstar. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You're quite welcome! GO-PCHS-NJROTC (talk) 14:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle Extend Reports

User:Addshore/temp/hugglex ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 09:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Yes, I've fixed that up. One question- Is there a way for Huggle to open pages opened in an external window, in Firefox, instead of Internet Explorer? It's quite frustrating. Steve Crossin (talk) 10:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep i have that. I think all you have to do is set your default browser as Firefox. That works for me ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 10:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle Extend Reports 2

User:Addshore/temp/hugglex If you want to ask me anything about this then please ask me on my talk page as i will not be checking here again. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 10:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

done. :) Would you inform me when the error is fixed? Best wishes, —αἰτίας •discussion• 11:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

i will. But at the moment i don't think that it is being developed ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 11:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism/ Dorothy Schiff

Hi!

I didn't intend to vandalize the page, I just put the article into the category which obviously fits best. She was the daughter of Jewish immigrants from Germany, so I put her into the the category Category:German-American Jews, a subcategory of Category:German-Americans. What was wrong with that?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.60.239.141 (talk • contribs)

Hi there. You have been making a lot of category edits recently. For example on Matt Schaub id 195107011 in your contribs. You changed [[Category:German-Americans]] to [[Category:Americans of German descent]]. Please could you not remove the category [[Category:German-Americans]] as it still fits. Maybe just add [[Category:Americans of German descent]] as well as the others. I have just seen that with the ones that i did revert i shouldn't have but i should have reverted the other ones. Please can you consider keeping the old category's as well as the ones you add. Also when you add a comment to a page please sign it by adding ~~~~ after your message.·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 13:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Hiya. I've removed your report of User:Drudgetwat - they've made one edit only, their first ever, which could be construed as a test, and have been given no warnings. Taking them to WP:AIV is therefore a bit harsh! _GB^T/C 13:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I use huggle and it is only meant to add a user/ip to AIV after final warning. I really don't have a clue what happened with it. Sorry for any troubles caused.·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 13:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

No worries. It seems to have been happening a lot the past couple of days - I use a Mac, so have never used it, but User talk:Sceptre‎ was having similar problems yesterday. Thanks for the reply. _GB^T/C 14:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Reverting image

Hi! Firstly, I'd just like to warn you that I'm new to Wiki, and I'm pretty crap at editing, so the picture, which I reverted wasn't at all mine. But I think that it was constructive, as it is one with the correct line-up and I just don't think that we should have a picture with Mutya on, as she is no longer a Sugababe. Sorry, if I didn't explain this but I didn't know how to interact until you messaged me.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.167.162 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for coming and explaining this to me. I have removed your warning as i see that your edit was in good faith. The reason i reverted the edit was because of the name "Sugagbabes gay 2007 011.jpg". I know understand what that actually stands for and i will now try not to revert this type of edit again. If you need any more help just ask here. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 14:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's find a better picture.

It's ok. No harm, no foul. You seem to be a trusted Wikipedian, so if you could find a better picture than the one at G.A.Y, but with Amelle on, then that'd be great, because, on this one you can't see Heidi's face! I would do it myself, but I'm still learning, as you know!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.167.162 (talk • contribs)

Hey again. Firstly can i recommend that you make an account by clicking on the link, top right. Secondly can i recommend that you sign your comments by adding ~~~~ after them. Regarding the picture i am afraid i am very busy reverting vandalism at the moment. If you find a copy right free image then feel free to upload it to wikipedia and add it to the article. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 14:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Kingsham school

These Are the RIGHT colours, I WENT TO THIS SCHOOL!!!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.86.172.159 (talk • contribs)

Hi there. I am afraid that i keep reverting the colours as i believe that the ones you change them to are wrong. I am getting the colours from the original article which is here[2]. This is why i keep reverting your changes to this article. I believe that the user that created this article was correct. I am just about to do some extra research and if i find i am wrong then i am sorry. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 14:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

You are now blocked due to other vandalism. I now guess you were wrong bu i have not been able to obtain new information regarding the colours. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 15:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Addshore/welcome

Given that this page is unprotected I would stongly sugest substing.Genisock2 (talk) 15:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree. I have just submitted it for protection. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 15:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Wrong answer. Increasing the number of protected pages is not good. Just subst the thing ans have done with it.Genisock2 (talk) 15:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I will do that from now on. I am also going back and changing all of my {{User:Addshre/welcome}} to {{subst:User:Addshore/welcome}} to clear everything up 100% ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool it also slightly decreases server load although that isn't the issue it used to be.Genisock2 (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Here's a barnstar for improving Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! The Helpful One (Review) 22:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Ty Helpfulone. I just manages to get to my goal. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Request for Username Usurp

In that case, would you be willing to make cross posts from both accounts to prove you own the account and add the link(s) to the request? Thank you! Icestorm815 • Talk 22:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure if it would since any ol' user could added the sig to the bottom of the request and say they own one of the accounts as well. Your best bet is to place a note on the bot account using the Addshore account saying something like "I own this account". Then log in as the shorebot and say, "Addshore owns this account". I'm sorry if this seems a bit tedious, it's jsut we have to make sure we don't make an incorrect name change. Cheers, Icestorm815 • Talk 22:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that! I'll add a note on the request page. Icestorm815 • Talk 22:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, the request can't be filled until March 8. However, you could still work on the code because once the username change is performed, all the user subpages (ie:userpage, talkpage, monobook, etc.) are transfered under the new name. Icestorm815 • Talk 22:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep, it will! :) Icestorm815 • Talk 22:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Recent Changes Check

Please do not run an exact clone of ClueBot on en.wikipedia. You can run a clone of ClueBot on other Wikipedias, but if you run it on en.wp, they will just edit conflict and cause trouble. And, no, all the code is right there. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 13:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry yo

Look, I have problems with my computer. I dont know what wrong please forgive me.. SO are we cool with each other, Ttyl -Pce out my bro Hugh Ahbut —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.41.137 (talk) 16:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

You have now been blocked by Blueboy96. See User talk:68.40.41.137 ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Suggestions for your User Page

Hello, and thank you for your welcome note. I have a few suggestions of text changes to your user page:

1. In the "Anti Vandalism" section, your sentence "I revert vandalism and many other things good", states that you revert vandalism and that you revert other things good. Do you mean to say that you revert both bad things (vandalism), and many other good things? If so, what do you revert the good things to? Or, if you mean the sentence to describe the manner in which you do your reverting, the proper sentence should read: "I revert vandalism and many other things well."

2. From the last sentence of your "Anti Vandalism" section, I was unable to locate and define the adverb "nicly". Did you mean to use "nicely"? A definition of "nicely" can be found from this link [3]. Hopefully, this information will help you make a decision as to which adverb you would like to use.

Thanks for your time; and don't worry -- I will sign my post with four Evenin' scrot! (talk) 18:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC). Evenin' scrot! (talk) 18:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that. I just changed the things that you said and thanks for spotting them. Just wondering, what brought you to my user page? :D. Ahh yes the welcome message. Well thanks again. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

for leaving me a welcome message :) I gave the cookies to my little brother. FirstRainbow (talk) 18:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I try to welcome as many people as i can to wikipedia. If you ever need any help then just post another message here. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

My User Page

Hi there,

In general, it is considered bad practise to edit another user's user page without their permission. Had I wanted my user page to be placed in a category, I would have placed it there - at the moment, I don't really want categories on my page, so I didn't.

In the future, please think about asking before simply editing.

Thanks, Ale_Jrb^talk 20:54, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok will do. I'm trying to get everyone that uses huggle to actually be in the people that use huggle category. currently it is looking very empty with about 7 people in it. Instead of adding the category to the pages i will just talk to them on their talk page. Thanks fr telling me this. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem :). Ale_Jrb^talk 17:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Category- Users who Use Huggle

• Just wondering, I checked this category, and it says that only 19 users are in that category. Do only 19 users have Huggle? Surely not. Steve Crossin (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Nope loads use huggle. But the problem is that none actually has the category on their page. I have been trying to add the category to as many pages as i can using the names that update the white list. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

• I guess this is the message you placed the talkback message on my userpage just now? Yes, I noticed that more people use it. Don't mean to be short, there are just vandals I have to fight. Thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 07:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I will come and join you. :D ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

List of tautological place names

Hi Addshore - I've reverted your edit to List of tautological place names. I realise it was a good-faith one, but when you correct "mistakes" it's worth ckecking that they weren't deliberate! :) Grutness...wha? 23:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

I always check things i change like that and to me it looked like a total mistake. I guess i was a bit sleepy. Sorry for any trouble caused in my mistake. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

s'alright. easy mistake to make :) It does look strange, but it's simply explaining the literal (tautological) meaning of "The La Brea Tar Pits". Grutness...wha? 11:23, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Huggle cat

Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle. I am already on this category :). Under C. Thanks anyway, CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 18:54, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Yee you are one of the few. Sorry for the message that means nothing. :D. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

re: category:users who use huggle

I think you already added the category to my page here. Thanks, though. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 18:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

So i did. Thanks for telling me and sorry for the wasted message. I stopped adding them and decided it would be nicer to ask people. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:58, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

It's fine. I don't mind people editing my userpage as long as they are doing something constructive. I didn't even know there was a category for people who use huggle, or I would have added myself to it. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 17:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

re: category:users who use huggle 2

Nope I don't use Huggle. I was only updating it when it changed from Gurch's userspace to the Wikipedia mainspace for a short time. D.M.N. (talk) 19:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Ahh ok. Sorry for the message. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I know. D.M.N. (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

re: category:users who use huggle 3

Hey. I'd personally rather not add the category, thanks. I like to keep my user page fairly sparse, and I use a wide variety of anti vandal programs and scripts, not just huggle. I also don't see any great benefit in such a category. Will (aka Wimt) 19:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok. This is why i ask now and don't just add. :D ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, adding people without asking would be a very bad idea. Will (aka Wimt) 19:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Now 100% agree. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

re: category:users who use huggle 4

• No problem, glad to help. I added the cat to my user page, thanks. — Becksguy (talk) 20:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

goo goo. Thanks for that ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Addshore/guestbook.

Nice font! ;) · AndonicO ^Hail! 19:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV again

You have recently submitted a considerable number of people to AIV although many have not been sufficiently (or at all) warned, or they have not offended after a final warning was given. I see above that you were having trouble with Huggle, leading to a similar situation - is that the cause of this again? - 52 Pickup (deal) 20:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I think it must be as i donot as for a block my hand. Huggle should just automatically request after final warning. This is strange and i will try to sort it out. Thanks for telling me again about this problem. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:39, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree that it's Huggle's fault. It also happened to me. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Very strange because it has never done it to me before. Only recently. And now about 3 times :( ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

re: category:users who use huggle 5

not a problem, I hope I haven't stopped using it, I just got it:P 42--Pewwer42  Talk  21:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

It's a very useful tool. Thanks for adding the category. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

And in a similar vein...

What is adding the category useful for? I mean, I'm very happy to do so, but I would like to know what it achieves. Thanks, Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 22:19, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

It will just show everyone who uses huggle. You probably won't gain much from it. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Huggle User Category

On User talk:BlastOButter42, Addshore said:
Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. Perhaps you could make it so the Huggle userboxes automatically add the category also. -- BlastOButter42 ^See Hear _Speak 22:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Yup, added myself. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 23:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Good good. Now we can acctually kind of see the people that use huggle ^^. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle. Lorem ipsum.

I would be fine with the category, but I do not want categories to appear on my userpage. And since __HIDDENCAT__ is all or nothing, I do not see a way for this to be possible. So if there is a way to achieve this, I will be happy to do so, but until such a time, I must respectfully decline. seresin | wasn't he just...? 03:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

well personally i dont know of any ways. If i find one out i will be sure to tell you. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:30, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Edits regarding November 2007

I noticed you reverted changes to the article November 2007. The changes were made by User:ClueBot who reverted vandalism. Please be more careful on which edits you revert as you accidentally restored vandalism to the article. Mkdw^talk 05:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I am guessing that with this one cluebot reverted the edit and then i rolled it back just after but not seeing it load the edit. It is good to know someone notices these things. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Edits regarding The Kill

Addshore, I went down a couple of your most recent edits and discovered that you reverted beneficial changes to the article The Kill. You changed, 'External links, to External Links. The edit made was correct in changing the 'L' to lower case per Wikipedia:Naming convention Mkdw^talk 05:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. As you can tell i have forgotten many small things like this. I would like to say thanks for going back and checking my edits as people telling me what i do wrong is the only way for me to do it right next time. I have now locked this into memory and i hope that i will not make the same mistake again. Thank for informing me about these errors. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Award

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I, Mkdwtalk, hereby award User:Addshore The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your vigilance reverting vandalism on the English Wikipedia.

Thanks for the award mate. Ill add it to my awards page. :D ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:36, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Huggle User Category

I'd love to add myself to the Huggle user category, but unfortunately I can't get it to work... It runs fine, up to the point where I'd like to start working, but then it never displays the recently modified articles - so there's little use for it. --Koert van der Veer (talk) 07:43, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Are you trying to use the irc feed or the special changes page? ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 07:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

The Benefits Of Vandals

• Well, to be honest, I sort of like vandals. They help my edit count go through the roof. In the last four days, my edit count has gone from 600 to 4000 [4] :) So, they're helping me :) Steve Crossin (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

• And I just removed some vandalism from your page, just FYI :) Steve Crossin (talk) 08:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Lol. Probably same for me. Thanks about the vandalism revert on my page. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 11:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

New messages from Voyagerfan5761

Hello, Addshore. You have new messages at Voyagerfan5761's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 10:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Responded to

1st article

I am trying to write an article on a few pharmaceutical companies that are not found on here because they are new to the industry. I am wondering how I can write the article so it does not get deleted and can remain on wikipedia for I feel these few companies need to be in here, because as of now there is nothing about any of them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.61.222.209 (talk) 16:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Some guide lines are.

1. Don't breach Copyright.
2. Don't make it an advertisement or look like and advert.
3. Don't just write about one line, Try to make it as detailed as you can.
4. Try to keep it in a nice "wiki" format or the same style and layout as other articles like it.

·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

ClueBot

Is there a way of finding how often you beat it? _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 19:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

User:WBOSITG has beaten me 4 times. There are 224 users who have beaten me more times. you can do it in irc. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 20:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I am grateful

I am grateful to be given a chance to express myself. I will make it short. The information on the page 'MAHDI' is incorrect. As a matter of fact, the books Saheeh Bukhari and Saheeh Muslim have detailed description about Imam Mahdi given by Prophet Mohammad. That would mean that NO sect of Muslims, neither Shias nor Sunnis or even any sub sects deny the MAHDI or his coming. I would request that I may be allowed to make the changes in that article without providing any references, but I offer anyone who may not agree with me to please go through the said books and verify what I stated here.Tanvir A Khan (talk) 21:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I don't quite get what you mean. I can't say i have reverted your edits or any edits on MAHDI. Please could you explain yourself. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 12:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 10	3 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties	Eleven users apply for bureaucratship
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas	Role of hidden categories under discussion
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual	Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing"	News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article	WikiProject Report: Football
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Just thought you should know

• I just reverted vandalism on your user page. Your page is on my watchlist and when I saw the vandalism, I just clicked revert. I'm keeping an eye out for you :) Steve Crossin (talk) 16:46, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Just like to say thanks loads. Wikipedia needs more people like you to fight the vandals. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:50, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Oh, it was no trouble. We look out for each other :) The recent backlash to my vandal fighting efforts has been so severe, that I've had to get my user page semi-protected. Now, I'm patrolling the Recent Changes, and the New pages. I'm trying to round myself out more. I've just graduated my adoption program :D, and I really want to start admin coaching (because I think I would be a good admin) but I think I wouldn't survive an RFA, even with my vandal fighting efforts. But my account is not even a month old, though, I feel I've contributed a fair bit. What would you suggest? Regarding Admin coaching. Steve Crossin (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Well my account is very old :E. I don't think i could survive an RFA at the moment either but i might try my luck eventually. I don't really know what to suggest, Keep on fighting the vandals. Maybe ask some admins what they think of you. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Yeah, I've thought maybe I should ask some admins of their opinion of me. However, the only real thing I have to my credit is my vandal fighting efforts. I spend far too much time on Wikipedia (for the record it is 4:15am where I am). And I try helping out as much as I can with people. But I tend to have a zero tolerance on vandalism. Which might have to change. But no. I dont like vandals. I won't tolerate vandalism. Steve Crossin (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep i have a 0 tollerance as well. Also i kind of spend too much time on Wikipedia. I also mainly do anti vandalism stuff but i have started to tag pages and patroll new pages and things like that. I also respond to some {{helpme}} templates. I try to do as much as i can. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Well, I mainly fight vandalism. And for the record, my user talk page just got vandalised. =/ Oh, and look at this here. Seems I've made some stupid mistake, and warned myself! [5]. Shows how fast I was going. I tag new pages as well, I'm trying to participate in XFDs, I tag pages for speedy deletion, but it's mostly fighting vandalism. Steve Crossin (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Lol sometimes i miss warn / miss revert but i have never warned myself before :D. Also yes i tag for speedy deletion whenever i see a page that should be. If anyone has any tips on what to do post here :D ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle category

Seems to be a sorting problem here. For some reason, new people adding themselves to the category are getting sorted under U for User. Enigma ^msg! 21:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I know how to fix this and i will send out a message to all of those that need to do changes tomorrow. Thanks for informing me about this. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

People didn't put the |username at the end. I just looked. I'm going to go ahead and fix some of them myself. Enigma ^msg! 07:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I manually fixed a bunch of them. Good night. Enigma ^msg! 07:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: Huggle Category Problem

Fixed now. Thanks for the heads up. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN} ^{aka john lennon} 18:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

I fixed mine also. Sorry, I didn't know the parameter was required. — Becksguy (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Some of the users notified are inactive, so I just went ahead and fixed it. Everything is sorted correctly now. Enigma ^msg! 03:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

ok thanks for telling me ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

What a lovely welcome.

Especially the biscuits! Thanks.--Whipmaster (talk) 22:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Im gald you liked it. I try to welcome as many people as i can. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 09:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

New message

Hello! This is a new message. Kobold9 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 10:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

good to hear it :D ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Alleging that Homeopathic medicine is placebo and it's practice Quackery is objectionable.

Dear Addshore, I am not a rebel, but alleging that Homeopathic medicine is placebo and it's practice Quackery is objectionable. Please try to see that no one, especially George Herbert Lambert doesn't block me for sockpuppetry again. I promise not to be disruptive. Thanks, Ramaanand (talk) 17:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Ramaanand

Blocked so i will not say any more than this.. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 11	13 March 2008	About the Signpost

From the editor
Accusations of financial impropriety receive more coverage	Best of WikiWorld: "Five-second rule"
News and notes: New bureaucrat, Wikimania bids narrowed, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Vintage image restoration	WikiProject Report: Professional wrestling
Tutorial: Summary of policies	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 4, Issue 12	17 March 2008	About the Signpost

Best of WikiWorld: "The Rutles"	News and notes: Single-user login, election commission, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Dispatches: Changes at peer review
WikiProject Report: Tropical cyclones	Tutorial: Editing Monobook, installing scripts
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 13	24 March 2008	About the Signpost

Single User Login enabled for administrators	Best of WikiWorld: "Clabbers"
News and notes: $3,000,000 grant, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Dispatches: Banner shells tame talk page clutter	WikiProject Report: Video games
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)