Adzz

--DV8 2XL 09:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

List of words having different meanings in British and American English

Thanks for your input on this article. It would actually be useful to be able to see on your User page whether you come from US or UK or elsewhere (and what region) to be able to understand better your perspective on some of the updates you are making, especially if others disagree with or question them. (In fact you may note that I've questioned / changed some of your recent updates, but have eplained why on the Talk page.) Best wishes. -- TrevorD 23:54, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! -- TrevorD 10:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Lists of Words

There's a discussion going on at Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Lists of Words over the interpretation of policy regarding lists of words. As a fairly recent contributor to [List of words having different meanings in British and American English], you might wish to add to the debate, as it affects several AfDs going on, and a current Deletion Review. Thanks. WLD 21:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2006

I assert to have voted for picture 4. Adzz 23:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Join us?

Hello, Adzz! Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Greater Manchester-related articles. Given the interest we're assuming you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Greater Manchester? It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Greater Manchester-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. The project has in-house specialists to support and facilitate your ideas. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

-- Jza84 · (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Amplifier cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Amplifier cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Removal of category from your userpage

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

2009 UEFA Champions League Final

Actually, the Title Holder always uses the Title Holders qualification spot regardless of their domestic league position in order to prevent situations whereby the holders do not qualify because they finished outside the qualification spots in their domestic league. Also, Man Utd were given the #1 seed in the group stage draw for that exact reason. Therefore, I have reverted your edit. – PeeJay 21:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

page review

can you please review this page: sakib

thanks :)--Historyfeelings - talk 07:02, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)