Akakievich
Faraj, the proper spelling of Farage
editWhy are you blocking accuracy improvements to the page on the arabic name Faraj? Farage is merely an anglicised version of Faraj, and there is *no* evidence, anywhere, that this was a Huguenot name.
Why do you continue to promote an utterly unsupported lie?
Are you fit to be doing this 'editing' job? You seem incompetent to me.
Ahh, you have history here...
The Signpost: 9 March 2023
edit- News and notes: What's going on with the Wikimedia Endowment?
- Technology report: Second flight of the Soviet space bears: Testing ChatGPT's accuracy
- In the media: What should Wikipedia do? Publish Russian propaganda? Be less woke? Cover the Holocaust in Poland differently?
- Featured content: In which over two-thirds of the featured articles section needs to be copied over to WikiProject Military History's newsletter
- Recent research: "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the Holocaust" in Poland and "self-focus bias" in coverage of global events
- From the archives: Five, ten, and fifteen years ago
Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter
editGuild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter
 
Election results: In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 21 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our February Copy Editing Blitz focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: Sign up now for our month-long March Backlog Elimination Drive. Barnstars awarded will be posted here after the drive closes. Progress report: As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
edit- News and notes: Wikimania submissions deadline looms, Russian government after our lucky charms, AI woes nix CNET from RS slate
- Eyewitness: Three more stories from Ukrainian Wikimedians
- In the media: Paid editing, plagiarism payouts, proponents of a ploy, and people peeved at perceived preferences
- Featured content: Way too many featured articles
- Interview: 228/2/1: the inside scoop on Aoidh's RfA
- Traffic report: Who died? Who won? Who lost?
A barnstar for you!
edit
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Eski Dürbe is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC) |
Women in Red April 2023
edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
edit
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Rollback granted
edit
Hi Akakievich. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Comments on Svitlana Boytsaniuk
editHello. I would like to ask you regarding your comments on the nomination of Svitlana Boytsaniuk. Although I have decided to move beyond the work of monitoring regurarly articles for deletion, I would like to know better your argumentation to gain more experience on this field. With my WP:BEFORE I nominated this article, I have seen all the sources you mention and the biographic details, but I made the exactly opposite conclusion from your comment (proposal for deletion instead of keep).
At first, you mention that this scientist has held a highest-level post at a major academic institution. While she is dean of a specific faculty (not of the whole university), the university itself doesn't possess the criteria to be considered as a major academic institution. Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University is not included in any major university rankings (QS, Times Higher Education) and is only 93th among Ukrainian universities in Webometrics, that's why I consider it as local or regional academic institution (not a major one). Also, you mention a table with sources of articles that I have checked before my nomination, articles that discuss one specific project as a war relief effort. Based on the sources of this project, you justify WP:GNG; however, I saw it as WP:BLP1E, WP:SUSTAINED and what it's mentioned as "If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual". Is that similar to the case of the project for soldiers and refugees and the scientist is only notable for this one? Since, the academic institution may not be considered as major in terms of university rankings in Ukraine, how WP:GNG is finally validated?
I would like your help on this example to better understand the criteria of Afds for the future, since you may have more experience. Thank you, Chiserc (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Hello @Chiserc and thank you for your message. First of all, I would like to point out that I, too, am relatively new to AfD. All my input is based only on my informed, good-faith interpretation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. That said, I don't think QS and THE are reasonable ways to determine whether a Ukrainian university is "major"; they are notoriously unreliable and biased in favour of Anglo-American universities. Once again, you are applying Anglo-American standards to Ukrainian subject matter. Ivano-Frankivsk NMU is not one of the foremost institutions in Ukraine, but it is a major one where the study of medicine and dentistry is concerned.
- There is certainly a compelling argument to be made that the coverage pertains only to a single event, but given the sources in question refer not to a one-off event but rather a longer-running project, I think inclusion is justified.
- Lastly, please, please avoid using AfD in a way which diminishes the representation of already underrepresented groups on Wikipedia. I understand that this is not your intention, but when you search for articles to delete among lists of women, or submit articles to AfD before you have searched in the relevant languages, you do irreparable damage to Wikipedia. Think of the big picture, and how your AfD strategy will affect Wikipedia as a whole. I don't want this to become an encyclopaedia only about English-speaking men. Akakievich (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Dubliany, Rivne Oblast
edit
Hello! Your submission of Dubliany, Rivne Oblast at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Dubliany, Rivne Oblast
edit
On 3 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dubliany, Rivne Oblast, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to local legend, the St. Nicholas Church in Dubliany, Rivne Oblast, was built there by accident following a clerical error? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dubliany, Rivne Oblast. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dubliany, Rivne Oblast), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)