User talk:Akakievich/Archives/2021/December
License tagging for File:Deborah Duering portrait.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Deborah Duering portrait.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Deborah Duering portrait.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Deborah Duering portrait.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:49, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note - See WP:NFC#UUI item 1. It's not sufficient that a free image doresn't exist, it must also be the case that a free image cannot be created. As a living person, a free image could be created. -- Whpq (talk) 21:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Whpq: I see, apologies for the misunderstanding. I'll contact the author to ask about relicensing, in the meantime, let's delete it. Akakievich (talk) 10:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
You might be interested
editHi. This IP[1] whom you rightfully reverted, has been pursuing an on-and-off campaign for over 3 years in ordert to severe/diminish/nullify links between Iran and the Caucasus, in particular the North Caucasus. They simultaneously push for a pro-North Caucasian POV by inflating figures and adding unsourced content. A rangeblock was conducted some time ago (there's more behavioural information in this thread),[2] but this LTA POV pusher is still at it. Thought you might be interested. Best, - LouisAragon (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
- @LouisAragon: Thanks for sending this over. I had no idea - have just had a dig through some of these edits and the sheer scale of them is wild. I am by no means an expert on the Caucasus, but I will keep an eye out for this kind of thing in future. From my experience so far on Wikipedia it seems like this kind of POV pushing activity is sadly a real issue - especially in subject areas where the average anglophone editor might not recognise it immediately. Thanks anyway for your attempts to keep things reasonable. Akakievich (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
editGuild of Copy Editors December 2021 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the December GOCE newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since September 2021. Current and upcoming events
Election time: Our end-of-year election of coordinators opened for nominations on 1 December and will close on 15 December at 23:59 (UTC). Voting opens at 00:01 the following day and will continue until 31 December at 23:59, just before "Auld Lang Syne". Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here. December Blitz: We have scheduled a week-long copy-editing blitz for 12 to 18 December. Sign up now! Drive and Blitz reports
September Drive: Almost 400,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 27 people who signed up, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. October Blitz: From 17 to 23 October, we copy edited articles tagged in May and June 2021 and requests. 8 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. November Drive: Over 350,000 words of articles were copy edited for this event. Of the 21 people who signed up, 14 copyedited at least one article. Final results and awards are listed here. Other news
It is with great sadness that we report the death on 19 November of Twofingered Typist, who was active with the Guild almost daily for the past several years. His contributions long exceeded the thresholds for the Guild's highest awards, and he had a hand in innumerable good and featured article promotions as a willing collaborator. Twofingered Typist also served as a Guild coordinator from July 2019 to June 2021. He is sorely missed by the Wikipedia community. Progress report: As of 30 November, GOCE copyeditors have completed 619 requests in 2021 and there were 51 requests awaiting completion on the Requests page. The backlog stood at 946 articles tagged for copy-editing (see monthly progress graph above). Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Jonesey95, Dhtwiki, Tenryuu, and Miniapolis. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
JackSepticEye
editGreeings Jack, It is nice to finally reach you in your latest iteration, please switch Your Game To twitch.tv So More People can CONNECT --216.209.124.128 (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC) EXACTLY
- @216.209.124.128: Hello, I'd report this as spam if you hadn't written only to me for some reason. I'm afraid I'm not JackSepticEye, what on earth gave you that impression? Akakievich (talk) 17:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you are resident in the United States)
editI am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Apolo1991: Hello, thanks for your message. I don't typically write about history on Wikipedia, and I'm not resident in the United States. I appreciate the research you are doing, but please take more care before sending unsolicited talk page messages next time. Akakievich (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
editHappy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
edit- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia