Akshath99
Ae dil hai mushkil( film) has become very succesful, grossing 200 crores globally. The artiicle on Ranbir Kapoor needs some editing, as Ae Dil Hai Mushkil, ended Ranbir's dry run at the box office.Akshath99 (talk) 11:44, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2017
edit
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kerala. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — LeoFrank Talk 12:59, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
January 2018
edit
Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Narendra Modi, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Sitush (talk) 08:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
edit
|
Teahouse Invitation
edit
|
Hello! Akshath99,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
|
January 2018
edit Please do not add or change content, as you did at India, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — LeoFrank Talk 17:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
edit
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 08:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. The verifiability policy is not optional. You must provide a bibliographic citation for any content you add. DMacks (talk) 09:13, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 19:47, 11 February 2018 (UTC)March 2018
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 08:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Akshath99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did make some changes on many web pages, on the basis of some citations , that I failed to put forward. I was blocked from vandalising the page. I do agree that Wikipedia , is keeping its authencity close, but all I was trying to do- was to make some constructive edits, on the basis of certain facts, that I have acquired by talking and interacting with people, who confront the ground reality. I could have copied something from my textbook , and just pasted it here. Instead- I intrusively researched on my edits, parting a few, to make the data as a real as possible. Most of the information on certain pages, certainly does align itself with facts, but does not facilitate the ground reality of the place or person. I know that I should have attached some links, which provide this data, but truth to be told-I do not know to do it. I assure you that my future edits, will hold greater responsibility and accountability, not only as a Wikipedia user, but also as a reader. I am not trying to convince you to unblock me, I am asking you to show some clemency in this matter, so that my pursuit to spread my knowledge around the world, with help of Wikipedia’s expansive machinery, is not hindered. I do acknowledge all my faults and promise for greater responsibility and durability for my edits. I apologise for making such edits, and will refrain to do so, in the future. Please give me that one last chance, to not only repeal my mistakes, but also by giving me an opportunity to be more constructive in my editsAkshath99 (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have reviewed your request, but I remain unconvinced that you actually understand the problem with your edits. You still appear to believe that word-of-mouth primary sources - "the ground reality" - are acceptable sources; they are not. Until we are sure that you understand what sort of sources can be used on Wikipedia, we are not going to allow you to edit. I would suggest that you read both WP:RS and WP:V, and explain your understanding of those two key policies in any future unblock appeal. Yunshui 雲水 10:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Akshath99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have read the WP:RS and WP:V and understood my mistake. My content was not attained from fully verifiable and published sources. It hence, lacks authencity , as it is from “word of mouth” and not from published and verified sources. I have realised my mistake fully and ensure that I’d excercise my editing rights with better accountability and responsibility in the future. I also ensure that there will be only published and authentic sources in my information. I admit being callous in my publishing of information and will refrain from making any such vicious and unverifiable sourcesAkshath99 (talk) 02:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No answer in over a week. SQLQuery me! 23:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Akshath99, in order to help us ensure you will change your behavior moving forward, please find an article that you are interested in adding content to, then write the information you wish to add to the article here on this talk page with a citation, making use of Wikipedia's citation tools outlined in help pages such as WP:INTREF. As the administrator who blocked you, I would be willing to lift the block if your proposed addition is properly cited with a reliable source. Mz7 (talk) 02:34, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
WP:INTREFGandhinagar Although the Congress did win the municipal body elections in 2011; In 2012, 3 of its major party members defected to the BJP, giving the latter, a majority to rule with.