Alanrhobson

Alanrhobson, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Alanrhobson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Orkney

Hi and thanks for your interest in Orkney. I have reverted your 3 edits for now but intend to re-install some elements of them asap. Here are the issues:

• Please don't amend imperial to metric or vice versa on article pages if there is a pre-existing system in place without discussing this on the talk page and obtaining consensus first.
• You have added some interesting information about the Jacobite era, but the citations are not complete, or entirely consistent with the existing system. As it is a Good article I'd like to sort this out. I will replace the text, perhaps in a slightly amended fashion and fix the detailed references, but I don't have the books themselves. If you could provide a full citation in the "General References" section I'd appreciate it. If you need any help just leave a note here or on my own talk page. Ben MacDui 11:19, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Ben Macdui:

Your moniker is named after an excellent mountain! (which I have climbed).

Really disappointed, though, that you removed my Orkney additions after all my hard work putting them on. They added valuable info the existing article. It is not clear why you felt you had the right to remove them, unless you know even more about Jacobites in Orkney than I do.

As for the referencing, I have a PhD in History, so I think I am able to reference correctly. All my references give title, author, date and page number(s).

Re miles/km, nearly everyone (99% or so in my experience) in Britain (Scotland and England) uses miles not km. Miles are also the British legal measurement, mentioned in all statutes relating to distance. Not sure, therefore, why anyone would object to the switch.

1) I did not remove your Orkney additions. I replaced them in a more suitable format. I left a space in the refs section for you to add the book names, which you have not yet done. Sure, I can probably find them on Amazon, but the ball is in your court.

2) I have removed your additions form Outer Hebrides because if you can't be bothered to understand how to edit Good Articles correctly I am not sure why I should expected to provide corrections. I'd be happy to help in re-entering them if you need assistance.

3) Your PhD in history is neither here nor there. We have an in-house Manual of Style (aka MOS). It is an irritating and complex beast which, like much of our content, changes all the time. That isn't a reason to ignore it on articles that meet certain standards. (you are much more likely to get away with inconsistencies on pages that lack decent content anyway - not that you should, but that's the way things are). For good standard articles you should follow the existing article style (e.g. in this case provide a publisher and publication location and ideally an ISBN).

4) Whether you or I like it or not, anyone (Prof of History or 12 year old wannabe) have the right to add or remove anything. What stays is ideally arrived at by consensus. This can be a clumsy process too, but so it goes.

5) I don't have any real issue with the content you have added as such - it seems authoritative and well-researched. Its the style that needs improving.

6) Measurements can be a surprisingly contentious issue. You may have a view on land distances (and I don't disagree with the general point you make) but for a great deal else in physical geography the metric style is used by sources - especially land areas, issues relating to nature conservation, geology etc. The convert template always allows both to be seen so the MOS issue is consistency - please don't make the style inconsistent, whatever your personal views.

I hope you will take the above in a good spirit - we need more authors who provide quality content and I very much welcome that. (We recently lost another PhD in history who is much missed by me). The project is all about collaboration and I hope that if you understand what I perceive to be my needs better we will find ways to improve things in a constructive way. In a nutshell all I am saying is "please be collaborative and understand the manual of style". Best wishes, Ben MacDui 10:13, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Ben Macdui,

Thanks for your swift reply.

1) I see you have indeed kept my Orkney additions, but you have made some changes, which is frustrating. For example, I deliberately avoided using the term 'rebellion' because it is a loaded term - it implies that the Government had the legitimate right of rule, which of course the Jacobites disputed (to them, it was the Hanoverians who were the usurpers and rebels). Therefore, it isn't very helpful that you have changed my 'rising' to 'rebellion', to give just one example.

Fair enough. I don't share this view but you are at liberty to change it back (although you should also read WP:3RR).

2) You seem to have made my references re Orkney worse by removing the book titles. I had carefully put them in, and in italics, so I am unlcear why you took them out again.

Its because they are in the wrong place. Pls add the details to the general references sub-section at the foot of the page.

3) I am unclear why you've removed my Outer Hebrides bits. You don't explain why they are incorrectly edited. The onscreen message said it had been done correctly (it soon lets me know if I've done something wrong!).

See above. The referencing is inconsistent with the style of the rest of the article per Orkney.

4) I'm of course aware (your point 4) that anyone is able to remove anything they like. However, that doesn't mean that they should do. I have been visiting and editing Wikipedia since 2006 (mostly anonymously, before I decided to formally join and be attributable last month) and I have hardly ever removed something. I normally just add things where they have been left out by the author.

OK

5) The problem with the convert template is that it gives km as the main amd only has miles in brackets afterwards, as if as an afterthought. However, in the interests of harmony I won't change any further dual measurements - although if I give measurements myself it will definitely be just in miles.

At the risk of causing a disadvantage to my own position, that's not how it works - it just depends on the order of parameters.

{{convert|10|km|mi}} gives 10 kilometres (6.2 mi), but {{convert|10|mi|km}} gives 10 miles (16 km).

6) Out of interest, did the PhD person Wiki recently lost (whom you said you much missed) leave bcause they were fed up with people altering their input, or for a non-Wiki related reason?

Not really, as mostly they tended to edit in more obscure areas of history where there was (as far as I know) less contention. I don't really know but there were 2 Arbcom cases they were involved in that may not have provided the result they were hoping for. Perhaps they got married and have better things to do. Dunno really.

7) Finally, I still have much to learn about aspects of Wikipedia. For example, given these exchanges are on my usertalk page (as you suggested), how do you know when I have replied? I know that one can put the setting to know when a contribution has been altered, but I didn't know that it could be done here too.

Your user talk page is on my watchlist - all I have to do is click on the 'watch' button at the top of the page and I get a list of changes just as per article space from the 'watchlist' tab at the very top of the page. QED Ben MacDui 08:23, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Regards

Alan

October 2014

Hello, I'm Davey2010. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Karen Dotrice without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Davey - I edited the entry because the info on it was incorrect. Joseph Andrews was not a German film, it was British; nor was it a telefilm. It was made for, and released in, cinemas. Even a cursory glance at sources such as IMDB and Halliwell's Film Guide confirm this. Therefore the entry was also wrong to say that Dotrice's only adult film was 'The Thirty Nine Steps'.

Meantime, please be aware that, in addition to removing sourced data, your edit suggested that Joseph Andrews was a feature film. It was a German television film. Cheers! —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 22:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I edited the entry because the info on it was incorrect. Joseph Andrews was not a German film, it was British; nor was it a telefilm. It was made for, and released in, cinemas. Even a cursory glance at sources such as IMDB and Halliwell's Film Guide confirm this. Therefore the entry was also wrong to say that Dotrice's only adult film was 'The Thirty Nine Steps'.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alanrhobson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Billy Sharp, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alanrhobson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alanrhobson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alanrhobson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

The source was the table later on in the entry.

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Feckenham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lady Jane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Act of Settlement 1701, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacobite (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Fitzgerald Beale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rod Cameron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

comment revision

It is regarded as a good practice to note a comment is being revised when it has already been replied to. ~ cygnis insignis 13:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Young Sheldon's father

Howdy. in Young Sheldon, I essentially reverted edits by an IP user that disagreed with a Wikipedia decision made today (as of yet, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Raegan_Revord is still in draft space). By doing so, one of your edits ended up being removed as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Young_Sheldon&diff=next&oldid=1090076062 Sorry about that. I wanted to let you know in case you wanted to add it back in (I would do it myself, but right now I can't confirm the information). Alden Loveshade (talk) 23:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)