AlexandraMichelleMarkus
Welcome!
editHello, AlexandraMichelleMarkus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Bahad 4. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Vensco (T | C) 22:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 1 June
editHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Bahad 4 page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Avi Dorfman for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avi Dorfman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avi Dorfman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dear AlexandraMichelleMarkus, considering WP:COI it is probably not a good idea to write articles here using (mostly) sources written by someone whose name sounds a lot like yours. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:28, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
There were other journalists who wrote articles on that same topic, some even before I did, but I used my articles because they were easier to find and cite. I will change the sources to those written by other journalists. AlexandraMichelleMarkus (talk) 13:30, 3 June 2016 (EST)
- You don't have to necessarily do that, but you need to be aware of appearances. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
edit{{Ivmbox |Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PatrickMtz97, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:56, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
|
}
Welcome
editHello and welcome. I just want to mention that you need to make a great many more edits before you will be allowed to weigh in at deletion discussions relating to the Levant, and also that all edits need ot be reliably sourced and neutral in tome. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:36, 27 July 2016 (UTC)