User talk:Alexf/Archive 66
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Alexf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 60 | ← | Archive 64 | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 | Archive 68 | → | Archive 70 |
RajBajTaj1
Hi Alexf. You just blocked the above user, they will also need talk page access revoked [1], thanks. Agent00x (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
DTraficante
dude, all i did was upload my logo and you deleted it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DTraficante (talk • contribs) 12:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not so. It was deleted because Wikipedia is not to be used for advertising. Also there are limits on what you can put in your user page. Please remember to start a new section in Talk Pages with a section header, else they get lost in the shuffle. -- Alexf(talk) 12:48, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Edit got deleted
The subject I wrote about is recently published by many national and international news media agencies like yahoo news, MSN, ANI, TOI, DNA, DailyHunt, India TV, Zee5, Kashmir Reader and many more. He's a notable person as clearly seen on Google search engine but has no Wikipedia page. So, I thought I might add him to Jammu and Kashmir artist's list but the moment I edited the page it go deleted within seconds. Can you please help me out? UriBoyka10 (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- As the Edit Page clearly states: "No red links or un-linked entries. Every entry in this list must have an article written in the English Wikipedia, with reliable sources to support inclusion, else it will be removed without warning." You seem to have disregarded that prominent notice. Please read the clear explanations linked from that page: Wikipedia:Write the article first. If you need instructions on this see: Help:Your first article. If you need the complete set, you can read the help pages. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 19:51, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou so much dear Alexf. I would surely consider your piece of advice before writing something new to Wikipedia. UriBoyka10 (talk) 09:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
User Vandalism 73,18,218,180
Hello! I saw that you blocked the user: 73,18,218,180 for insistent vandalism. Although its blockade has already been lifted, the user has recently and erroneously changed the dates of birth, death and administration of several colonial mayors of San Antonio, Texas, who ruled in the 18th and early 19th centuries, without any source: He did so in the List of mayors of San Antonio, and in articles such as that of Juan Leal or Simón de Arocha, among others. The user has already been blocked several times for continuous vandalism but he keeps committing the same action. So I think something has to be done with him.
Greetings!--Isinbill (talk) 19:44, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Yup. Everything I've checked ahs been the same sort of vandalism )bogus changes to biography dates). Left an only warning but looking a the number of edits I think this justifies and immediate block for continued v after a block. Meters (talk) 20:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've reblocked this IP as Alexf has not been online for a few hours. Widr (talk) 21:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Widr:. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk) 21:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've reblocked this IP as Alexf has not been online for a few hours. Widr (talk) 21:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Autobiography
Who should write my biography on Wikipedia? Djlisalove (talk) 17:07, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- Are you notable? In that case, provided that there are sufficient independent and reliable sources, somebody eventually will. If you are not, then maybe Wikipedia is not for you. This is not a social network, but an encyclopedia. It is not Facebook. Any article posted to WP must comply with the Golden Rule. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 18:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:10, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 02:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
User Talk Pages
I guess you are "just doing your job" and thank you for your selfless service on behalf of Wikipedia and the "new page patrol" that does often go without thanks. I know it is a tough job that somebody needs to do. There are trolls and asshats that can crawl under your skin who do real damage to this project, and your efforts really do make this on the whole a better place.
I would hope that you would give a whole lot of latitude though toward using your administrator tools on user talk pages of all things. I know what I was doing was a bit shady I guess from somebody being really hardcore about Wikipedia policies, although in general I would suggest that you try to at least treat stuff added to the user space by the user themselves as more of a sandbox than doing a hard slap across the face and treating that new user as an idiot. I sincerely hope that you welcome and encourage participation on Wikipedia too and don't bury them under rules. And remember: WP:IAR from time to time :) --RSHorning (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Davincci Lourenço de Almeida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi! I've taken the liberty of unblocking this IP; it was indeed editing properly and helpfully, and if the edits had come from a registered account the filters wouldn't have been triggered. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 02:11, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Jpgordon: Didn't look right to me with so many filter triggers, but that's fine. Thx for the note. -- Alexf(talk) 02:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Question about revdel
Hi Alexf. I noticed that you used revdel to hide this spam link. I'm not exactly complaining, but my interpretation of WP:REVDEL is actually that we shouldn't use it to hide mere spam links
. In some cases, it may actually be beneficial for non-admins to have access to the historical revisions so they can point to them as evidence for blacklisting URLs. WP:RD5 is a really nebulous criterion, and to be honest, it's not that clear to me what it means. I suspect, however, that the community probably would not support interpreting RD5 to mean that just any bare spam link can be revdelled at admin discretion. What do you think? Mz7 (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- You may be right. I do not like spammers, and think that they should not be rewarded with publishing their links. Leaving them open in previous versions opens up dangers of people clicking, and either the spammer gets rewarded with clicks, or in the worst case scenario, they are malicious sites. As said, maybe your interpretation is correct, so I wont be doing it as in this case, going forward. -- Alexf(talk) 19:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
I was about to decline the report but edit conflicted: the edits look good faith IMO (e.g. adding a DOB with a reference), and may reflect inexperience more than blatant vandalism. You may be more familiar with the case but just wanted to add my 2 cents after reviewing the user's edit history. SpencerT•C 17:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Spencer: - I am not familiar with the user but this edit [2] shows a user not here, if not pure vandalism. -- Alexf(talk) 17:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The deleting of Niles Schilder
I am asking about a page that was deleted in May 2020 about Niles Schilder, I have no connection with the person in question but I do know that he is very well known especially in Suffolk which is were he lives. When the page was created it was not referenced correctly and was taken down, this is a problem I intend to put right therefore I would be very happy if you could reinstate the page, thank you. 2.102.223.248 (talk) 15:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- You should always try to supply a link to the page to make it easier to find such and old page. In this case the page was empty. It was created by User:Niles Schilder and just contained the name. That's it. Nothing there to userfy. Note the user was blocked indefinitely for abuse of editing privileges and socking. If you want to start a draft, you will have to start from scratch. May I suggest if you do, to consider creating an account? It is not usually advisable to create a subpage in a shared IP account that you have no control of. -- Alexf(talk) 16:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| For quickly knocking out Vandals. I f l a q (talk) 21:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC) |
- Thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 21:06, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Please delete page
Hello, I've just been wondering how to delete the Wikipedia page I created, but I've been having struggles considering an administrator needs to adjust that for me. If you by any chance could delete the https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andy_Patelesio.jpg or just search up Andy Patelesio and it will be the first image on google, under the name file:Andy_Patelesio.jpg – Wikimedia Commons.
Thank you very much. Have a Lovely day and hope to hear from you soon115.188.81.228 (talk) 22:14, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
- That page is (was) in Commons. The request has to be made for a Commons Admin. I see it has been deleted already. Please start a new section with a section title (I added one), else it mixes with whatever was there before and gets lost in the test. -- Alexf(talk) 22:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
Ravidas again
Sir, this is regarding the POV push and unsourced changes in the Ravidas article again. These new users [3] and [4] are modifying sourced birth and death days. I've opened a discussion in the talk page and notified the user [5], but they continue to vandalize it [6]. These users are likely related. Also I would request to protect the article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- (belated reply) Reverted and user warned. -- Alexf(talk) 01:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Shipyards
I am writing sourced information do not delete it otherwise you will be reported.Cengizsogutlu (talk) 01:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- + how can i write article before i can make title! let me first finish titles than i will creat one by one dont disturb my editings before i finish!Cengizsogutlu (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cengizsogutlu: Please read the clearly marked notice in the Edit Page for that article. Every entry there requires an article in the English Wikipedia. That is where the sources go. Articles go first. -- Alexf(talk) 01:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- yeah i got you im not moron boss my plan was first creat titles then creating pages i already made some let me do articles now before reverting againCengizsogutlu (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cengizsogutlu: Please read write the article first. If you are unsure of how Wikipedia works, you can always ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 01:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Okey I was angry that I did so much research and was worried about being deleted. From now on i will first make article then adding to page.Cengizsogutlu (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Don't be angry. That's how it works. You can retrieve your references from the talk page of the article. Make articles in Draft format. If unsure how, ask. -- Alexf(talk) 01:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Okey I was angry that I did so much research and was worried about being deleted. From now on i will first make article then adding to page.Cengizsogutlu (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cengizsogutlu: Please read write the article first. If you are unsure of how Wikipedia works, you can always ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 01:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- yeah i got you im not moron boss my plan was first creat titles then creating pages i already made some let me do articles now before reverting againCengizsogutlu (talk) 01:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Cengizsogutlu: Please read the clearly marked notice in the Edit Page for that article. Every entry there requires an article in the English Wikipedia. That is where the sources go. Articles go first. -- Alexf(talk) 01:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
03/2021
I am using archives and would like to ask if there is anything that needs to be corrected.Thanks. 123.195.96.79 (talk) 11:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
User talk:123.195.96.79/Archive need to be deleted? 123.195.96.79 (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:51, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Thabks! I knew it was. 17 years! How time flies! -- Alexf(talk) 20:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).
Administrator changes
Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.
Technical news
- When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
- Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)
Arbitration
- A community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure is open until April 25.
Cleaned up your vandalism of Babu Chotelal Shrivastava
I recently edited Babu Chotelal Shrivastava to restore the original birth year from obvious vandal edits. I was shocked to find that the most recent such edit [7] was done by an administrator with over 170,000 edits in 17 years of editing.
Even a cursory reading of the article shows that your change could not possibly be correct. Indeed, this link [8] shows that two vandals defaced an article that was already in fairly bad shape. Good faith editors eventually cleaned up most of the damage but the linked edits remained.
Please make sure to actually read articles before you make changes to them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6080:660E:EDE0:E827:9D4B:3E61:4271 (talk) 22:00, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
- So a mistake was made. You cleaned it up. That's how WP works. -- Alexf(talk) 17:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
Proposed Deletion for Teju Babyface
Hi Alexf,
Thank you for your notification, the article is about a Nigerian comedian and entertainer, I have looked up the edits since the creation in 2014, dealing with other contributors who don't follow the rules to entries are a challenge, I have however taken notes and edited as appropriate. Tundealuko (talk) 14:34, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that third party appeals are allowed but discouraged.
- The 2021 Desysop Policy RfC was closed with no consensus. Consensus was found in a previous RfC for a community based desysop procedure, though the procedure proposed in the 2021 RfC did not gain consensus.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamed tosuppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.
- The user group
Arbitration
- The community consultation on the Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions procedure was closed, and an initial draft based on feedback from the now closed consultation is expected to be released in early June to early July for community review.
Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).
Administrator changes
Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless- Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)
Guideline and policy news
- Consensus was reached to deprecate Wikipedia:Editor assistance.
- Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.
Technical news
- Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.
Arbitration
- After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.
I am not sure what was in the deleted edit on this article, but I would check the other contributions too. There were more Nazi allegations. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- All redacted now. -- Alexf(talk) 20:10, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. Scorpions13256 (talk) 20:11, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Sniff test
Hi Alexf. You blocked TKS teaching and deleted their promotional draft Draft:TKS teaching. A little over two hours later, a new account (David Combs) appears and re-creates it, only to be deleted again by Liz after I'd nominated it for G11. David Combs then created it again.
He left a message on my talk page, so I replied and asked him if he had any affiliation to the draft's subject or the blocked account. He replied that he did not, but I'm not sure I buy that explanation. Is there enough here for a SPI? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure. If you suspect sockpuppetry, you could ask for a Checkuser (I am not). -- Alexf(talk) 19:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe I'll give it a little more time and see if there's any more behavioural evidence to present in his next set of edits. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Remove semi-protect?
Any reason to continue the protect on AN/TPS-43? All vandalism was from a single user that has been perma-banned across socks. Seems safe to open now. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Maury Markowitz: Agreed. No need. -- Alexf(talk) 12:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Regarding adding our business wikipedia content
Hi Alex, We have created the Wikipedia page for our business earlier but it was not found. Now we have planned to add it again henceforth I request your support to publish the content by reviewing the same. How to share the content with you to verify. Kindly request you to do the needful. M Sankar SankarM2 (talk) 04:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- @SankarM2: There are some issues here. First, is your business notable within Wikipedia's definition? Are you planning to advertise your business, masquerading as an article? Have you read the article on conflict of interest? Have you read, and disclosed you are a paid writer? -- Alexf(talk) 15:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
2A00:23C4:F811:9F01:115A:B76E:6E1A:896F
Dear Alexf, Thanks for blocking this vandal – 2A00:23C4:F811:9F01:115A:B76E:6E1A:896F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). In your free time, could you take a look at WP:RPP and consider protecting the two pages (Brioche and "You can't have cake...") the vandal was active on? There have been attacks on these pages continuing for a few days now. Best, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 23:22, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
Technical news
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
\
Victoria Harbour tunnels
On [9], could you please explain what had been wrong to describe the two tunnels in the same direction, be it north–south or south–north? Citobun had insisted to put them in different directions, i.e., one in a north–south direction and the either south–north (not to mention his omission of the word "Centre" and "stations") and I genuinely don't think that's desirable. Cheers. 203.145.94.110 (talk) 12:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
vandalism
Hi Alexf, Good day. I have reported user RafaelHP to AIV (see here who vandalized article as per WP:BLP - defam ,and the editor then vandalized my talk page (place a waring message) because I warmed them on their talk page. - Kindly help and action. Thank you in advance. Cassiopeia talk 01:30, 30 September 2021 (UTC)