User talk:Alexf/Archive 67
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Alexf. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 60 | ← | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 | Archive 68 | Archive 69 | Archive 70 |
IP Block question
On March 23rd 2021 you imposed a 6-month ban on user IP 192.16.96.3 for persistent vandalism, well the ban is expired, and it seems like the user is back to vandalising, I will watch the user in the near future if he/she commits more vandalism, however I am not sure on what to do if he/she does, and if I should do anything at all because of your 6-month block. Thanks - 22:11, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- @RandomEditorAAA: when and if they vandalize again, the usual warnings are in order, up to at least Level 3, then a report at AIV should be done so any admin on duty can take action. -- Alexf(talk) 23:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:54, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Request for PC Reviwers Rights
Hi, Alefx I have Currently Rollbacker I 'm Request for PC Reviwers Rights. Please Check My Contribution and gave me this Specific Userrights. I help to Check edits of New and Old User and I'm Currently Use SWViewers,Twinkle , Redwarn ko reverts edits and I 'm currently memmber of CUVA.Best Regards Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 03:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry but I do not do rights-granting. It is time consuming to study each case, and I have a Wikipedia plate full of things to do. Try asking at Administrators' noticeboard. -- Alexf(talk) 10:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted redirect
Hi Alexf! Could you restore 1950s American car culture? I'm slightly curious what happened to it, as 1950s American automobile culture never seems to have been deleted. Are there other possible missing redirects to that article? {{u|Sdkb}} talk 02:37, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Sdkb: Done. It was deleted in 2012 as it had a typo and redirected nowhere at the time. -- Alexf(talk) 13:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
Technical news
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
Arbitration
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
Miscellaneous
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
TPA
Hi Alexf. Could you please revoke talk page access for Aulichkurt? They've continued to add garbage non-talk content to it after being blocked. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:48, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Drm310:
Done -- Alexf(talk) 23:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Recent block
Regarding your block of Idiot Driver, do you think it could be a sock of Highschoolprodigy? Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:26, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Scorpions13256: Don't know. A CheckUser would have to investigate. -- Alexf(talk) 01:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'll file an SPI. I can make a convincing case. There might be more. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted external link on 'Ibn Fadlan' page
Hi.
Today I added an external link at “Ибн Фадлан” page. But you considered it inappropriate and deleted it.
My link goes to the newest scientific study from 2021. The work is devoted to resolving the contradictions associated with the trip of Ibn Fadlan to Ancient Russia. This is directly related to the content of the Wikipedia page. This work was published in the scientific-peer-reviewed publication and confirmed by the expert opinion of the Doctor of Historical Sciences of the Belarusian Academy of Sciences.
I would like to ask you to leave this link on the page.
IChubrik (talk) 19:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
- @IChubrik: It is rather simple. Adding links to your own website is spamming. Also note that your own website is not a reliable source. Please read the linked pages to understand. If you have any questions about how Wikipedia works, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 19:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| One year! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 02:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Adonis article
Can you please explain how I have a close connection to the band Adonis and where is the promotional or advertising material I wrote in that article? -- Happiness Is Everywhere (talk) 09:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Happiness Is Everywhere: Wasn't your username the name of the band, before it was changed this week? -- Alexf(talk) 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- No, my name was "Teka$hi 69" which has nothing to with the band. -- Happiness Is Everywhere (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Happiness Is Everywhere: Then apologies. Seems to be a case of mistaken identity. -- Alexf(talk) 13:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- No, my name was "Teka$hi 69" which has nothing to with the band. -- Happiness Is Everywhere (talk) 13:24, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
Administrator changes
Technical news
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Survey about History on Wikipedia
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.
If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 10:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Please revoke TPA from this LTA.
– AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Query about a block you placed on an IP user
Hello Alexf,
I would like to draw to your attention a block you placed on an IP (User talk:106.69.59.162) which I feel was completely unjustified. You blocked them for vandalism, when in fact, it was actually me, before I had an account, and I was actually on RC patrol. I tripped a whole bunch of filters, including one where I tried to revert userpage vandalism, which I then reported as false positive, however, if you analyse those edits, you will see that they were at the very least good faith edits, if not actually constructive. I have only recently realised that I was blocked for those edits, as the IP must've been reassigned soon afterwards, before I next tried to contribute, so I never saw the block notice at the time.
Please, remember, to assume good faith, that IPs are people too, and that it is possible for an IP to go on RC patrol.
If, after looking closely at the edits that IP / I made you still believe that block was justified, please let me know why. Thanks. Mako001 (talk) 01:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- @The Alternate Mako: I see what you mean. Did look wrong at time (and triggered many bot warnings). In any case, it is a moot point, as this was a 31-hour short block back in October, so the account is now free and clear. An IP is not associated to you so your user account has no issues. . -- Alexf(talk) 01:40, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, I just thought I should bring it to your attention anyway, since it seemed to have been an erroneous block. I guess it is a good example if a case where, even though an editor is tripping filters with every edit, it may not actually be vandalism. No hard feelings. 🙂 Mako001 (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Disclosure of employer
Hello, I just edited the International School of Monaco's page on Wikipedia today for the first time, to update the school's information about students, programmes available, diplomas offered, etc. I work in the school's marketing department and am paid to update their online information. I do not see where to disclose this, so I just wanted to make sure that this is ok? I've renamed my account Salmi22 now, and would like to be able to make any edits in the future. Is this ok? Thanks! Salmi22 (talk) 10:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Salmi22: Please read Paid-contribution disclosure. -- Alexf(talk) 10:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
New Wikipedia article for Jonathan Cott
I just created a new Wikipedia article for Jonathan Cott, and saw that you had done so in the past. Please check it out, and make any additions or changes that you see fit.Jhlechner (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Nope, never did. Might have been I deleted per request, or removed vandalism. No idea at the moment, and I don't know the gentleman. -- Alexf(talk) 16:15, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Merchandise giveaway nomination
|
A token of thanks
Hi Alexf! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
|
 |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks
Not sure how I managed to fail to block that account - must have failed to check the box to override the existing block or something. Girth Summit (blether) 13:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: Done - No problem -- Alexf(talk) 13:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
The WikiEagle - January 2022
 |
| The WikiEagle |
| The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
| Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Members
New Members
Number of active members: 386.
Total number of members: 921.
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
Arbitration
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
Miscellaneous
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-en
lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
How we will see unregistered users
Hi!
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
Thank you. /Johan (WMF)
18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Briard
Given this edit history, any objections if I convert this to a 1-year partial-block on Briard? Or we could just see what happens at the end of 31 hours. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:30, 12 January 2022
- @Ohnoitsjamie: No problem. Go ahead. -- Alexf(talk) 15:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Jumping straight to uw-3 at a newbie's page
Hi Alexf, I really appreciate your work in combatting disruption and vandalism. Without editors like you tirelessly watching out and taking action, articles would quickly degrade and the project would suffer. I really appreciate what you do here.
That said, please draw a distinction between user-warning levels when placing an initial warning at a user talk page. You recently placed this level 3 refspam warning at User talk:RadicalCopyeditor. While a warning citing WP:SELFCITE is appropriate there, this user has a total mainspace edit count of 39 at this writing. Additionally, there are discussions at their Talk page showing them coming on board with various other guidelines based on the types of mistakes new editors always make.
While placing a refspam warning is appropriate for this editor, in my opinion, placing a level 3 refspam warning as the very first warning about this topic is rarely valid for any editor, and especially not for a brand new editor. An amendment at the user's talk page would be a nice gesture. Once again, thanks for all you do here. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 19:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Mathglot: I was on vacation so I didn't see this message until now. You may be right. I didn't check the total number of messages. We get hundreds of people spamming their own websites every day, so sometimes things get out of hand. As I see, the user was instructed on what they did wrong and how they should proceed. Thank you. -- Alexf(talk) 02:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Completely understandable. Thanks for the follow-up, and hope the vacation was fun! Mathglot (talk) 02:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
|
|
Wishing Alexf a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Bobherry Talk Edits 11:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 23:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Do you know a place on Wikipedia I could get this source translated for a page draft I'm working on?
The source would be this here, and it is in Norwegian https://forum.arkivverket.no/topic/212052-arne-pettersen-siste-innvandrer-som-forlot-ellis-island-1954/
I'm still kind of new to the project, and since computer translators are giving me "bad results", do you know a place I can get help for this in-house. Thebrakeman2 (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Thebrakeman2: Not really. I would start by looking at the users in Category:User no-4 and asking some of them (look at who is active). Remember to always sign your comments in talk pages by adding four tildes at the end. -- Alexf(talk) 23:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Alexf: Thank you for the tip! Would you be willing to help work on the page (it's about 45% complete) or are you busy with other matters, IRL or Wikipedia related? Thebrakeman2 (talk) 01:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Thebrakeman2: I do not speak Norwegian so I can't. Besides I have a long list of translations of articles I have to port from Spanish and Portuguese Wikipedia. Good luck. -- Alexf(talk) 03:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Alexf: I think you misunderstood, it's an English Wiki page about a Norwegian man. Thebrakeman2 (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Thebrakeman2: I do not speak Norwegian so I can't. Besides I have a long list of translations of articles I have to port from Spanish and Portuguese Wikipedia. Good luck. -- Alexf(talk) 03:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Alexf: Thank you for the tip! Would you be willing to help work on the page (it's about 45% complete) or are you busy with other matters, IRL or Wikipedia related? Thebrakeman2 (talk) 01:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Could you fix an error on a page?
The “SS Dolly Madison” mentioned in the Oct. 8 section is not the same as the one for which has it’s page hyperlinked (the linked ship having been build 20 years after the other one sank). Could you fix it? Link here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_shipwrecks_in_1924#October 108.45.170.249 (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
Technical news
- The user group
oversightwill be renamedsuppressin around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
Arbitration
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
Book reference deleted
Hi there I put a couple of references to a new book Titan Blue by mbfox. I understand why it was deleted as I linked to my Web page but the book is available on Amazon. The book is therefore genuine. Is it possible for this to be included please? Many thanks Mbfoxauthor (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Mbfoxauthor: "Genuine" does not mean notable. More importantly Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. Self promotioon especially is strongly discouraged. -- Alexf(talk) 21:02, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Alex OK many thanks for the explanation and assistance. Mbfoxauthor (talk) 21:10, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi nice to meet you Alexf I am Chhota Bheem Fan
I am completely new to Wikipedia please tell me the rules and regulations of Wikipedia and what I should do, Thanks Chhota Bheem Fan (talk) 05:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Chhota Bheem Fan: You can start by looking at the help pages. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, you can ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 01:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Notice of external links noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jarble (talk) 15:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. That note dates from 2016. Looking back at it I see your point. It has been now removed. -- Alexf(talk) 15:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Unconstructive Edits done by unknown users
Hi Admin, I was scrolling through Wikipedia articles of my interest. I found that some of the users have done unconstructive edits to some of the pages like Parinamika & Arbit Choudhury. I request you to kindly block their IP address forever as they have been removing old Wikipedia pages. Thank You 2409:4053:200B:CD48:7D82:2BB9:E7C8:8C3 (talk) 17:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- FYI: Removing sourced content on [1]. A09090091 (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @2409:4053:200B:CD48:7D82:2BB9:E7C8:8C3: That is not the way it works. You should warn them upon revert, and if serious enough (and warned sufficiently), you should re port them at AIV. Also, IP Addresses are not blocked forever, as they are usually transitory, and shared by different people. If you have any questions about how Wikipedia works, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 18:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Revision delete
Hello, Alexf,
I'm not sure why you are using revision delete on edits like this one or this one which aren't offensive edits at all. They are just trollish behavior or standard vandalism. I don't think they qualify under the Criteria for redaction unless I'm missing something here. Did they somehow violate copyright rules? I can't see it. Also, you can do all the revision deletes you need to do on a page's edits at the same time, you don't have to do them one at a time.
Any how, thanks for the truly offensive edits that you remove from public view like the ones on the Hitler family (ugh!). Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Liz: Ok. You may have a point but they are disruptive. No complaints. Less work for me. -- Alexf(talk) 22:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Sockpuppet bloqued
Hello, i see that you bloqued the user Oscareduardo10Youtube for promotion, but seeing this page and WP:DUCK these user is a global lock evasion of Oscareduardo10, i reported these account to meta.wikimedia, I tell you so that you take it into account when blocking a puppet of him again Emolga826 (talk) 23:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Emolga826: Thanks. Did not know this one. -- Alexf(talk) 00:05, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
Technical news
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
Arbitration
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
Miscellaneous
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
Hi, thank you for hiding so much purely disruptive material and edit summaries for this article. I found two more that appear to need similar treatment: [2], [3]. Thanks again, Beccaynr (talk) 02:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Beccaynr: Done. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk) 03:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! -- Beccaynr (talk) 03:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Air Ghana page
Hello. I Saw you reverted the changes I made in Air Ghana page. I just wanted to know if I had made something wrong. Thank you. Best wishes. 84.78.242.253 (talk) 09:54, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- No. That was a mistake. Fixed. Are you User:Torpegun? If so please use your account to post instead of an anonymous IP, so you can see your post history. -- Alexf(talk) 11:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Helpful template
You may be aware of it already, but Template:Uw-efblock exists and would save you the extra step of noting the abuse filter in your block messages.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 00:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Ponyo: Well thank you! One I did not know. Noted. -- Alexf(talk) 00:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Block justification
I am curious as to your block of QuietDaParrot who made only 2 edits, and was given one warning following which they did not make any further edits. This was in the mid of February, so why did you apply the block today? Jay (talk) 16:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Jay: Filter log shows filters stopped him 15 times in a row in a span of 3 minutes today, typing "Your mom". -- Alexf(talk) 18:42, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oh thanks. I did not check the filter logs. Jay (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For reverting subtle vandalism on the articles of Malaysian federal constituencies. --NameName233 (talk) 05:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC) |
Deleting edits
I wanted to ask if you can hide (delete if possible) my edits on the napalm and F.R.A.S. (weapon) page, in the view history. The information of the consulted articles. I ended up copying entire texts from articles that i found to be copyrighted and reclaimed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F.R.A.S._(weapon) Basquyati (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Basquyati: You would have to identify which ones (suppliying the preper Diffs) as you did several changes to those pages. (see Help:Diff if unsure on how). -- Alexf(talk) 19:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- The comparative edition of napalm, is this, in total:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Napalm&type=revision&diff=1075828827&oldid=1032104969
- In the F.R.A.S., it is this:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Napalm&type=revision&diff=1075828827&oldid=1032104969
- I want you to delete all edits made by me. This is likely to cause the second page to be deleted, but I think it's remediable. Basquyati (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Both links are the same. -- Alexf(talk) 15:04, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
Blocking the /64
Can you please read User:TonyBallioni/Just block the /64 and start to block /64s more? Blocking /64s generally won't cause WP:COLLATERAL. Not just blocking one IPv6 address isn't going to cut it in the case of LTAs... thanks. wizzito | say hello! 00:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- I am begging you to please, please block the /64! I really don't wish to get mad, but I am getting genuinely annoyed by your adamant refusal to do so. You should have blocked 2601:89:4301:1190:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) instead of 2601:89:4301:1190:9854:efa4:78ac:6948 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). You should know as an admin that blocking /64s DO NOT normally cause collateral, yet you continue to block individual IPv6 addresses. That person has completely moved on from that individual IPv6 and is now using 2601:89:4301:1190:4597:3399:4C3C:41C7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log).
Facepalm wizzito | say hello! 23:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- A person using a /64 is not block evasion as well. For example, you blocked 2A00:23C6:D511:DA01:35EB:D9:A31F:E4C9 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and then blocked 2A00:23C6:D511:DA01:9D95:5C68:3D58:2675 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), who is on the SAME /64, as block evasion. Widr should not have to clean up that mess and finally get to blocking the /64. wizzito | say hello! 23:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Wizzito: I seldom if ever do rangeblocks as I am uncomfortable with doing it and blocking the wrong range. I understand your request and looked into it now, but it seems that Widr has already blocked the 64 you requested. -- Alexf(talk) 00:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- A person using a /64 is not block evasion as well. For example, you blocked 2A00:23C6:D511:DA01:35EB:D9:A31F:E4C9 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and then blocked 2A00:23C6:D511:DA01:9D95:5C68:3D58:2675 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), who is on the SAME /64, as block evasion. Widr should not have to clean up that mess and finally get to blocking the /64. wizzito | say hello! 23:56, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- I am begging you to please, please block the /64! I really don't wish to get mad, but I am getting genuinely annoyed by your adamant refusal to do so. You should have blocked 2601:89:4301:1190:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)) instead of 2601:89:4301:1190:9854:efa4:78ac:6948 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). You should know as an admin that blocking /64s DO NOT normally cause collateral, yet you continue to block individual IPv6 addresses. That person has completely moved on from that individual IPv6 and is now using 2601:89:4301:1190:4597:3399:4C3C:41C7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log).
Another Inumwa sock
See here. Best, GPL93 (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Aaand another one. Best, GPL93 (talk) 01:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
You RD5'd a spam link! I should do that more often. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thanks
I could not keep up with the vandalism. Sadbunny3 (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Amen. Thank you for blocking Tmode or whatever his name was. He was being a horrible person. Eg224 (talk) 05:05, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
IP rangeblock request
Alexf, you just blocked an IP I reported at AIV (2A00:23C6:D511:DA01:35EB:D9:A31F:E4C9). Unfortunately, after I made the report I found that the vandal had already moved to another IP within the same /64 range. Could you extend this block to 2A00:23C6:D511:DA01:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? Disruption from this range dates back to October 2021. --Sable232 (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Juan Feliciano
It might be worth your keeping the occasional eye on Juan Feliciano. The IP and the named vandal both reappeared on 5 March 2022, 10 days after your WP:PP expired; but haven't been seen since, presumably satisfied with their handiwork. Narky Blert (talk) 14:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Watchlisted. -- Alexf(talk) 14:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
John Tyler
Hi, thanks for your help at John Tyler. However, I noticed that the protection you put in is shorter than the previous protection which expired only a short time ago. The page has been an LTA target for awhile and a protection of at least several months is probably best. Would you please take a look at the page's protection history and consider making the semi-protection longer? Thanks. Kristoffersonian (talk) 23:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Kristoffersonian: You are incorrect. The previous semi-protection had expired today. I extended it to 31 March. Page watchlisted. Semi-protection will be extended if needed.Please report users to AIV if needed too. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk) 23:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- How am I incorrect? I said the previous protection expired a short time ago and that the protection you put in is shorter than the previous which is true. Please make the semi-protection longer. This page has been consistently vandalized despite multiple protections for long time. This has been going on for months. Look at the protection history. Kristoffersonian (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Kristoffersonian: Oh I see what you mean now. We try to keep pages open as much as possible, per Wikipedia's policies. Page has been watchlisted. Should they continue, then it will be extended for longer periods of time. Per your request, it has been extended to 7 April 2022. -- Alexf(talk) 23:16, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- How am I incorrect? I said the previous protection expired a short time ago and that the protection you put in is shorter than the previous which is true. Please make the semi-protection longer. This page has been consistently vandalized despite multiple protections for long time. This has been going on for months. Look at the protection history. Kristoffersonian (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- I still think two weeks is too short. The past few protections for this page have been too short. One of the previous protections was one month in length and that didn't do the trick. Each time the vandalism returns. Look closer. Kristoffersonian (talk) 23:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Kristoffersonian: That is as far as I am prepared to go today. As I said, I am watching the page, and I am sure you are too. Whenever something like this arises, you can request protection at RFPP, so anyone on duty will respond. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk) 23:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
FYI, this "helpful" user is a WP:HAND sock of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/CalebHughes, whose other socks necessitated the protection. Favonian (talk) 06:43, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Favonian: Oh? Interesting. Thanks. -- Alexf(talk) 09:58, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy first edit day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Alexf! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |  |
{{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:15, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! Time flies! -- Alexf(talk) 23:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Your block of 136.235.28.68
The entire range (136.235.0.0/16) should get a schoolblock. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:46, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
AIV reports
PLEASE do not be giving them warnings! This is an LTA, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dusty8686, who is engaging in rapid disruption; their most recently blocked sock today had a username that threatened an admin. RBI is the best approach here, not just letting them off with warnings. -_- wizzito | say hello! 00:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open proposing a change to the minimum activity requirements for administrators.
Technical news
- Access to Special:RevisionDelete has been expanded to include users who have the
deletelogentryanddeletedhistoryrights. This means that those in the Researcher user group and Checkusers who are not administrators can now access Special:RevisionDelete. The users able to view the special page after this change are the 3 users in the Researcher group, as there are currently no checkusers who are not already administrators. (T301928) - When viewing deleted revisions or diffs on Special:Undelete a back link to the undelete page for the associated page is now present. (T284114)
Arbitration
- Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures § Opening of proceedings has been updated to reflect current practice following a motion.
- A arbitration case regarding Skepticism and coordinated editing has been closed.
- A arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been opened.
Miscellaneous
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines has closed, and the results were that 56.98% of voters supported the guidelines. The results of this vote mean the Wikimedia Foundation Board will now review the guidelines.
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
This editor, who you had hardblocked for their username, has had it changed to this more acceptable variant, and seems to me to have no other issues. Can we unblock? Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Daniel Case: No problems with it now. Go ahead. -- Alexf(talk) 07:35, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Page and article deletion....
Why is everyone deleting my stuff on Wikipedia? I have been making an artist profile but still to no avail Spalowise (talk) 05:08, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Spalowise: That question was answered already in your User Talk page. This is an encyclopedia, not social media. . To paraphrase: Please read WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY and WP:NOTABOUTYOU. -- Alexf(talk) 08:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Apology
Hey! I just wanted to apologize to you for giving you a hard time and continuously acting like an ass on here last year. I was wrong and I’m sorry that I ever thought I was being funny or entertaining. I hope to show that my edits and contributions on here will continue to be strictly positive and non-disruptive. Littlejonahhill (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- I hear you. Answer: apologies don't matter, actions do. It is nice to see you acknowledge errors. Let's see if you can help the project from now on. -- Alexf(talk) 14:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, a change has been made to the administrators inactivity policy. Under the new policy, if an administrator has not made at least 100 edits over a period of 5 years they may be desysopped for inactivity.
- Following a discussion on the bureaucrat's noticeboard, a change has been made to the bureaucrats inactivity policy.
Technical news
- The ability to undelete the associated talk page when undeleting a page has been added. This was the 11th wish of the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey.
- A public status system for WMF wikis has been created. It is located at https://www.wikimediastatus.net/ and is hosted separately to WMF wikis so in the case of an outage it will remain viewable.
Arbitration
- Remedy 2 of the St Christopher case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to place a ban on single-purpose accounts who were disruptively editing on the article St Christopher Iba Mar Diop College of Medicine or related pages from those pages.
I'm scratching my head
Hi - so, I just reverted an IP address spamming Indian passport. Twinkle took me to their talk page to issue a warning, and I noticed that you had already warned them on 4 May about doing presumably similar stuff at Passport - so far, so mundane. Here's the bit that's confusing me: Passport wasn't edited at all on 4 May, and the edit that I reverted today appears to be the only one that the IP in question has ever made. What's going on? Girth Summit (blether) 10:51, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Girth Summit: Sorry for the delay. As was indicated in my user page, I was out of the country with no connectivity for two weeks. I don't remember this one. I suspect it was triggered by Filter 793, for spamming telephone numbers. -- Alexf(talk) 14:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- OK, thanks - it had me scratching my head, but I didn't check the filter log - that makes sense. Girth Summit (blether) 11:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
50.74.56.130
Hi Alexf, I think 50.74.56.130's removals were made in good faith; I just had to revdel others' reinstatement of the content as violations of the copyright policy. If it was a justified block, I'd probably re-block Johnniecowboy for sockpuppetry or block evasion, but I think a proper measure would be removing the IP block instead. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- @ToBeFree: Done. -- Alexf(talk) 22:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Several areas of improvement collated from community member votes have been identified in the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement guidelines. The areas of improvement have been sent back for review and you are invited to provide input on these areas.
Technical news
- Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
- The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.
Arbitration
- Remedy 2 of the Rachel Marsden case has been rescinded following a motion. The remedy previously authorised administrators to delete or reduce to a stub, together with their talk pages, articles related to Rachel Marsden when they violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.
- An arbitration case regarding WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has been closed.
don’t delete my putin (input)?
Why are you keep deleting my input? 107.116.93.8 (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Are you talking about your entry in Christopher? There is an explanation in the removal notice. There is also a very clear and prominent banner in the edit page for that article page, explaining that the list cannot accept entries without an article. Every entry must have an article in the English language Wikipedia. The article of course must assert notability. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 09:22, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
indef
You might wanna up this block given that they are still trying to spam themselves through their block. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Praxidicae:. Block was extended and a noite left. Thanks for the info. BTW, I like your user page. -- Alexf(talk) 20:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Threats of ISP Communication on My Talk Page
I have reverted what is difficult not to describe as a veiled threat on my talk page from your account.
Simply calling edits you disagree with "vandalism" and leaving up a well formatted statement that you'll "contact my ISP" if I post information about an issue your colleagues are actively trying to suppress is ridiculous, aggressive, and ineffective. I am not intimidated by your threat, and I'm confused what you thought the end result could have possibly been by doing that?
You should stop that kind of behaviour immediately. 71.65.65.144 (talk) 21:40, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
- It seems you misunderstood. It is not a veiled threat. It is a standard identifier for an ISP account. It is not your Talk Page. You do not have an account. You can easily create one and avoid the problem you seem to think you are having. See Wikipedia:Why create an account?. The reason that particular IP Address got that message is because it has been repeatedly used for vandalism in the past. This is not saying the current user of that IP (you), had anything to do with it. IP Address assignments change. You may get another one next time. Avoid the issue and create an account. -- Alexf(talk) 01:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
- I misunderstood nothing. Threatening to contact users' ISP for making edits you have material disagreement with is juvenile and inappropriate for this forum. I am not interested in the deflections but merely communicating to you how it comes across.
- Looking at the notes on the talk page for this IP, I see that these are in fact not vandalisms but a user trying to integrate cited material about a scandal involving someone with a declared conflict of interest with the wikipedia editor groups. I can't determine if you did not research before doing this or if you were already in awareness and simply didn't care, but perhaps you're using a non-conventional definition of "vandalism" in either case.
- Words mean things, and the words you're using don't mean the things you're expecting them to. I don't care if you've been here for 15 minutes or 15 years, I just simply want adult correspondence on the topic. The 'good ole boy' treatment over this issue is transparent to literally anyone reading. 71.65.65.144 (talk) 01:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).
|
|
|
Technical news
user_global_editcountis a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)
Arbitration
- An arbitration case regarding conduct in deletion-related editing has been opened.
Miscellaneous
- The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
FYI
Re your despamming of and warning to ShahArya6p (talk · contribs), see [4]. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 05:47, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Nice work! Andrevan@ 00:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! -- Alexf(talk) 02:11, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Merit talks, bullshit walks
Hi there. Did you block this account with the above username for suspicion of being a sockpuppet, as I suspect? Best, Castncoot (talk) 07:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- No. Name is not acceptable. Cussing, swearing in usernames is not a good idea in a serious project. -- Alexf(talk) 12:15, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Dr. Kevin Keenedy
Please remove All information referencing Dr. Kevin Kennedy. Not interested in continuing with Wikipedia or with Wikicommons. (talk). 13:02, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Glenn L. Sweigart (talk). 13:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
- An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.
Technical news
- The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
- Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)
Arbitration
- The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
- Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
- Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
My edit was reverted
I had added a statement in the crying article, clarifying that "feminine countries" are those whose governments prioritise gender issues over others, and I added a citation to support it. Unfortunately, you have reverted this, can you please explain why? Sincerely, 49.192.44.178 (talk) 23:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. Maybe overreach but there is no such thing as "feminine countries". -- Alexf(talk) 09:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- How come there is a statement about feminine countries in the article, I'll consider removing it, thank you.
- Sincerely, 49.192.44.178 (talk) 11:54, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/List of web directories
Template:Editnotices/Page/List of web directories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Huggums537 (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Disagree. Said so in the page. -- Alexf(talk) 12:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Olivia Newton John "vandal"
It turns out that 200.68.172.38 (talk · contribs · count) had duplicated content, likely inadvertently. 2806:2f0:8440:4a0b:c9f:17e2:1e0d:629 (talk · contribs · count) aka 2806:2f0:8440:4a0b:f42b:30dd:9a4:739c (talk · contribs · count) was removing the duplicated content. To me, it appeared that the bottom half the article including content, sources, and categories were being deleted. As the latter anons never ever left an edit summary as to why nor left anything on their talk page, I concluded it was vandalism. What should I do to make amends? My apology. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 03:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Apologize to them. -- Alexf(talk) 12:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Any suggestions on which IP talk page to leave an apology? The range? Should they be unblocked? Thanks Adakiko (talk) 12:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Revdel
I think you are being overly liberal with your use of revdel, recent examples that I just reverted: [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Not every piece of unhelpful nonsense is "purely disruptive material", as you labelled these. They need to be reverted but are certainly not what revdel is meant for. Widr (talk) 21:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ok. Will pay more attention then.-- Alexf(talk) 22:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
- An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.
Technical news
- The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
- The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.
Arbitration
- An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
- The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.
Miscellaneous
- The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
- Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
A report
Hello. User:Stuntneare delets texts of encyclopedia and refrences.پخش مطلب (talk) 17:22, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, but the proper way is to report to AIV after having sufficiently warned the user. I do not see many issues and do not see proper warnings. -- Alexf(talk) 17:29, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you.I will report there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by پخش مطلب (talk • contribs)
Regarding your block of Special:Contributions/2A00:23C4:709B:2501:0:0:0:0/64
Thank you for your quick block of this IP. Would it be possible to extend this block and remove TPA? I am asking because:
- The last block of this IP range was for 6 months, without TPA
- Per these edits, it seems clear that this IP intends to continue their disruption after the expiration of their block.
Thank you very much for your consideration. Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:17, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Was just coming here to say the same thing (both thanks and request for a longer block). Also possibly to include [10]. --JBL (talk) 21:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- @JayBeeEll: @Aoi: Block extended for a bit - TPA added. It is a public address. Can't block for 6 months. -- Alexf(talk) 22:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I'm not sure what you mean by your last two sentences, since the /64 range has been repeatedly blocked for longer periods of time in the past [11] (most recently by Ponyo and EvergreenFir). JBL (talk) 23:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- I also don't see how the "public address" bit applies. This is a static, single-allocation IPv6 range that has been repeatedly used for disruption and block evasion for the past 9 months. I've reblocked for 6 months, the same as EvergreenFir's March block that had since expired.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Ponyo: Ok. As it is owned by British Telecom, I thought it was public. Maybe I am wrong. -- Alexf(talk) 19:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- I also don't see how the "public address" bit applies. This is a static, single-allocation IPv6 range that has been repeatedly used for disruption and block evasion for the past 9 months. I've reblocked for 6 months, the same as EvergreenFir's March block that had since expired.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 18:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I'm not sure what you mean by your last two sentences, since the /64 range has been repeatedly blocked for longer periods of time in the past [11] (most recently by Ponyo and EvergreenFir). JBL (talk) 23:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
- @JayBeeEll: @Aoi: Block extended for a bit - TPA added. It is a public address. Can't block for 6 months. -- Alexf(talk) 22:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alexf. Another admin has posted at RFPP requesting a much longer semiprotection for this page. You might want to take a look. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Some falafel for you!
|
Hi, here is some falafel! Those look like pickles in the picture to me. I would have chosen no pickles but oh well. Enjoy. Rosedaler (talk) 02:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC) |
- Thanks! Falafel is always good. Pickles work for me. -- Alexf(talk) 05:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Disable TPA
Hey you might wanna revoke the TPA of 118.149.72.172. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Greg P Russell
My name is Greg P Russell and you have blocked me from my own page which I don’t appreciate what so ever. I made adjustments in the bio because it doesn’t reflect the things that I would like to see and there are inaccuracies as to what was originally on my Wikipedia page. I would appreciate you unblocking me so I can edit my own page please. 2600:6C50:157F:E3F9:9D78:DD69:6B9:9F05 (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
- As you do not link to the page in question, I have no idea what you are talking about. All I see is a message from an IP Address that has not edited in Wikipedia before. You have to be more specific so I can take a look, and respond properly. There must be a reason if you were blocked. The reason should be explained in the blocking message, along with the proper way to request an unblock. Any admin then would be able to respond, and if there was an error, correct it. -- Alexf(talk) 18:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)