Allaboutglue

February 2012

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia. Your edit to Araldite was successful, but because it was not considered beneficial to the page, the edit has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Farhikht (talk) 10:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Araldite. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Araldite was changed by Allaboutglue (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945971 on 2012-02-03T10:54:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Allaboutglue. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk#Glue.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Araldite shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. —teb728 t c 19:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Allaboutglue. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Araldite, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Araldite, you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

® should not be used in company or product articles on English Wikipedia. The removal of categories, interwiki links to other language wikipedias, or references which support sourced content is considered vandalism. Your username and promotional edits indicate the strong likelihood of a conflict of interest; if correct, that should probably be disclosed on your userpage, and you shouldn't add material to the article at all, although reverting vandalism and the removal of untrue unreferenced material is permitted (e.g., This stuff sucks, or araldite cures loneliness). Posting references and edit requests to the articles talk page (where you've previously posted) is prefered; since you've previously been reverted for promotional edits on the article, further editing there is likely to be reverted. Place {{Request edit}} on the article's talk page or your talk page, or post at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard; response time varies but will likely be slow. Be concise, and either list short requests or request them separately. Avoid WP:PUFFERY 'industrial applications as well as for consumers', marketing aims, 'expanding its worldwide market', 'emblematic of advanced technologies', etc. Dru of Id (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)