Allthenope
Cecile Flapjack (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Hello! Thank you for the message, I enjoy seeing many exciting edits from you!
Hey, Allthenope. Still trying to figure out using Wikipedia as an editor/writer myself. So just used to googling for little facts! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caitlinoeser (talk • contribs) 23:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Peer Review
editHi, Allthenope!
I reviewed your section on bell hooks and your edits were still there. The bit you added fit in find with the rest of the section, and I don't think anyone will delete it -- it is a relevant and important point to add on hooks' feminism. The flow of the added section is not a problem, nor are the grammar and punctuation. Excellent job! JG_StoCoNJ (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:59, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Good Evening! I thought your edits were good. They were related to the topics we have talked about in class. On the contrary, I think that this is a very large topic and I would have liked to seen you edit a topic that needs more information on their page. Additionally, your references look great and they were in the correct style. Overall, good job. Seunathm (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.219.212 (talk) 00:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Feminine Mystique has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Feminine Mystique was changed by Allthenope (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885817 on 2014-11-04T14:42:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)