Welcome!

edit

Hello, Ama975193, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Third Battle of Panipat have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  —Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 08:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Zawl. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Battle of Chamkaur (1704)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Zawl 18:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikh Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab Regiment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikh Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joginder Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Upma Sharma

edit

Hello, Ama975193. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Upma Sharma, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Upma Sharma to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Ammarpad (talk) 12:44, 28 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

It appears you are re-adding unreliable sources, sources without page numbers, and restoring misrepresented source(s), without any explanation. These types of actions will result in the notification of an Admin. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Guru Hargobind without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch | talk 19:21, 10 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Early Afghan-Sikh Wars

edit
 

The article Early Afghan-Sikh Wars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the sources mention the term "Early Afghan-Sikh Wars" -- this is the creator's OR. See talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. utcursch | talk 16:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

July 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. The edit in question is this.  LeoFrank  Talk 15:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Ama975193. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Ama975193. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Last warning

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur (1704), you may be blocked from editing.

April 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur. Alivardi (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sikh Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bikram Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rescue of Brahmin Girl

edit
 

The article Rescue of Brahmin Girl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. No idea where in the (not independent) source this story is included, and I can't find sources verifying the defeat of Mohammad and Isa Khan by Baghel Singh.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sir excuse me i m going to tell u the page no. 47 read the second paragraph please Ama975193 (talk) 17:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Ama975193: your article has moved to draft space for prior research time given. Please see WP:RS for additional reference idea. You can use {{subst:submit}} when your draft is ready for review. If you revert it to the mainspace, it will be deleted further without no notice. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 16:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Afghan–Sikh Wars, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ok kansas bear sir Ama975193 (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kansas Bear Sorry Sir Ama975193 (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ama975193 (talk) 17:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)SorryReply

Advice

edit

Hi I saw your edits hmm seeing your edits is quite conflicting. See don't do such disruptive edits as you did in many India-related articles. Please ask WP:Teahouse for any questions. Even you do this more, you may be blocked for indefinite time. Please be familiar with wikipedia guidelines and do edits. Most of the editors like you were faced with this things. Don't worry. See in next time edit in such a way that no one will take charge against you. I hope you understand. Our goal is to improve the encyclopedia. And we will do to archive it. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 16:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Which article Ama975193 (talk) 18:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

See in your talk page and see three articles was proposed to delete it. Only one Draft: Rescue of Brahmin Girl I moved to draftspace for giving you additional time. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 05:04, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Salabat Khan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Salabat Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ibbrranti Ennamdis (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hari Chand (hilly chief) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Hari Chand (hilly chief), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:58, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Salabat Khan moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Salabat Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Siege of Amritsar (1748) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Siege of Amritsar (1748), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Misl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Sialkot.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Barari Ghat moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Barari Ghat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 05:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Kama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bharatpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hari Chand (hilly chief)

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hari Chand (hilly chief), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Salabat Khan

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Salabat Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Amritsar (1748)

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Amritsar (1748), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hari Chand (hilly chief)

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hari Chand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Salabat Khan

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salabat Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Amritsar (1748)

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Amritsar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rescue of Brahmin Girl

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rescue of Brahmin Girl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rescue of Brahmin Girl

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rescue of Brahmin Girl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 23:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rescue of Brahmin Girl

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rescue of Brahmin Girl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Barari Ghat

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Barari Ghat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Barari Ghat

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Barari Ghat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of Gallantry awardees of CRPF moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, List of Gallantry awardees of CRPF, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 05:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Warning

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry SirAma975193 (talk) 18:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Sikh Martyred for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Sikh Martyred is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sikh Martyred until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AryKun (talk) 10:34, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:List of Gallantry awardees of CRPF

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Gallantry awardees of CRPF, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 15 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:List of Gallantry awardees of CRPF

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Gallantry awardees of CRPF".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Kunjpura (1772) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Battle of Kunjpura (1772), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Kunjpura (1772)

edit

  Hello, Ama975193. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kunjpura (1772), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Kunjpura (1772)

edit
 

Hello, Ama975193. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Kunjpura".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

AFD notice

edit

Proposed deletion of Battle of Delhi (1783)

edit
 

The article Battle of Delhi (1783) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the context in the article body matches the information in the infobox. Used the works of religious speakers instead of historians. Most importantly, none of the WP:RS calls the event as "Battle of Delhi".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imperial[AFCND] 10:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Amritsar (1757)

edit

Kindly take a look at this thread-[1] which addresses how much weight should be accorded to Jacques' and Vivek Chada's works. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 11:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Narendra Modi. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

June 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Narendra Modi) for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Black Kite, I think an indefinite site block might be warranted after his vulgar edit here where he inserted a swear word 3 times-[2]. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Ama975193. Thank you for your work on Raja Braj Dev. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:12, 15 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mittar Pyare nu

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mittar Pyare nu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jdcomix (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Battle of Amritsar (1757). I told you previously to go to the t/p and engage there. You keep making changes which are not supported by sources. If you do not use the t/p to discuss changes, I will file a report for your disruptive behaviour. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 05:25, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Battle of Jammu (1808) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Jammu (1808) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Jammu (1808) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:43, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply