Hello

edit

Please feel free to talk to me about anything.

Quit acting stupid.
Thanks Amr.eladawy (talk)

Welcome

edit

Hello, Amr.eladawy, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ikip (talk) 01:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

edit
 

The article you created: jspx may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}:

Find sources for jspx: google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

 
 
1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)
 
 
3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 01:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

May 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Lost (season 5), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:17, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

September 200.

edit

You have been reverted by two editors on this topic. To say he is the "driving force" is your own personal opinions. It is unsourced. It is also not needed, in a short summary, to point out whom he visited. Please take your "points" to WT:LOST. I have started a discussion there. If you continue to revert further, you will be in violation of WP:3RR and may be blocked. Please stop these edits until a consensus is gained. --HELLØ ŦHERE 15:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

February 2011

edit

  Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to 2011 Egyptian protests. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you.

If you feel the cited sources are not RS you can take it to RSN, or the talk page or provide a countery source for you claims. In the meantime TWO sources have asserted this which are not considered unreliable sources.Lihaas (talk) 12:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Jspx1.1.0.demoapp.png

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Jspx1.1.0.demoapp.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:06, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia is not a marketing channel

edit

Mr Amr El-Adawi: Wikipedia is not a marketing channel for your product. Your product is named Jspx-bay. It is appropriate that information about your software product is dealt with on the page "jspx-bay". That you have made up a nickname for your product ("jspx") is a poor excuse for trying to use Wikipedia to plug it. If you tried to actually call your product Jspx you would risk getting sued by Oracle. Furthermore, your product is not noteable, while Oracles Jspx technique is.

Arguably, you are probably the only person in the world that has a pet name for your software product. Please stop reverting the redirect from "jspx"->"jsp" here.

RandySpears (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC).Reply

March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jspx-bay may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • # '''${size(this.username)''' JEXL provides static methods to be invoked .
  • # '''${user.age>21?'You are OK':'You are minor'}''' ''user'' must be a jspx-bean defined in the Page controller and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:15, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Jspx.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Jspx.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Image source problem with File:Jspx1.1.0.demoapp.png

edit
 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Jspx1.1.0.demoapp.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Matr1x-101 (Ping me when replying) {user page (@ commons) - talk} 17:40, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply