|
Conflict of interest policy
editHello, Amvan2002. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
- avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
- instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
Regarding your changes on the Eminata group
editYou wrote:[1]
Hi Ronz,
As you notice, I attempted to make changes to the Eminata Group wiki page as it was loaded with incorrect information and/or information no longer applicable to the organization.
First of all, these two links (reference 2 and 3) below do not work as they have been deleted from the hosting sites:
^ "Bogus varsities prey on Indian students". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 2013-09-08. 3.Jump up ^ "A Response from Dr. Peter Chung, Executive Chairman of the Eminata Group". Ucanwest.ca. Retrieved 2013-09-08.
The entry nesting these two references has a defamatory term "convicted" which is not applicable given that it was a civil law suit. As you may know, in a civil law a judgment may be made against the defendant but it is different from a conviction which is applicable in criminal cases only. This is a dangerous entry as it harms the individual noted, and misinforms the layperson who may not know the difference between civil lawsuits and criminal charges.
The rest of the changes were made (pertaining to removing references to University Canada West and certain products) in order to better inform the public. I have supported my edits with applicable references and I'd like you to review them carefully before nullifying all my changes.
Once you verify the changes I made, I ask that you revert them (or edit them to your standards as I am not an expert in editing Wikipedia).
Thank you for your time Ronz. I look forward to working with you.
Sincerely,
Amvan2002
- Could you please respond to the conflict of interest message above, first? --Ronz (talk) 00:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sources should not be removed just because an editor cannot access them. I've added links to archived copies. --Ronz (talk) 01:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- " I have supported my edits with applicable references and I'd like you to review them carefully before nullifying all my changes." No, you did not. You appear to have a great deal of knowledge about the corporation, but provided no reliable sources for anything about the corporation, and you provided a press release for what appears to be trivial info about Chung. --Ronz (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Amvan2002, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Amvan2002! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:23, 3 February 2016 (UTC) |
Please follow COI and our policies
editI'd like to get the article properly updated. If you cannot find sources to support your edits, then we aren't going to accomplish much, and you put yourself at risk of a ban or block for repeated violations of our conflict of interest policy. --Ronz (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2016 (UTC)