Anacrossan

THE MISSING LINK IN THE TU'I KANOKUPOLU DYNASTY, IN TONGA:

Namoa or later known as King Siosaia Tupou, Tu'i Kanokupolu 1830- 45, in Tonga. Namoa was the youngest brother of Tuku'aho, King Siaosi Tupou 1, grandfather. Namoa was a father figure to Tupouto'a, and grandfather figure to his great nephew, Taufa'ahau who later as King Siaosi Tupou 1 in 1845 -1893. Namoa reared Taufa'ahau since the death of Taufa'ahau's father, Tupouto'a in 1812.

Namoa ( Siosaia Tupou) was the youngest son of King Mumui, Tu'i Kanokupolu, four children. King Mumui did have four sons, the oldest was, Tuku'aho, then Tupoumalohi, then Aleamotu'a and then Namoa. King Mumui oldest three oldest sons were from previous marriage. Mumui last marriage was to Fatafehi 'o Lapaha, last Tu'iTonga fefine of Tu'iTonga Dunasty and their son was, Namoa. As Namoa, was only child of last of Tu'iTonga dynasty, he will be the rightful heir to Tu'tonga dynasty. In addition, Namoa's father King Mumui, was also the head of the, Tu'i Kanokupolu dynasty. Not only that, Namoa's maternal grandmother, was also from Tu'i Hatakalaua dynasty. Therefore overall, Namoa though the youngest member of the Royal family, have bloodlines link to all ruling dynasties, in Tonga.

At this paragraph,are questions to ask:

1) Why, Namoa and the period that he was King of Tonga ( 1830 -45) been erased from history of Tonga in late 1918?

2) Why, re-write the history of Tonga, and made out that Namoa's brother Aleamotu'a was also known as Siosaia Tupou, which he was not.

3) King Aleamotu'a did die with name, Aleamotu'a in 1830, never with the name Siosaia Tupou. Why added Siosaia after he already died in 1830?

Malo a Bula

I noticed your post on Enele Ma'afu talk page and it is very interesting information if you have reference material please add the relevant information as any knowledge that can improve the quality and accuracy of an article is always welcome on Wikipedia. also please add some personal info on your user page it looks like you'll be around wikipedia for a while adding info on the Tongan related subjects, Keep up the work and have a good day.

Vinaka Maikeli MB 20:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Anacrossan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KTC 00:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A request to add context to your articles....

Good day, and thanks for inputting information about Tonga's history into Wikipedia!

One request.... frequently people come across articles by searching for them. They might not, upon seeing an article, realize what they're looking at - and they need an introduction that mentions (and links) the word "Tonga" in order to achieve that.

For instance, your article on Talaikaipau, before I edited it, did not make it possible to figure out that it was related to Tonga - and the article still doesn't give any hint as to the present-day location of the place (island, city, subdivision of city). I couldn't add that, since it was the first time I've heard about it, and I don't have access to your cited references.

Context helps! Thank you! --Alvestrand (talk) 08:35, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Good day to you too, Alvestrand. Thank you for your help.Anacrossan (talk) 21:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Your changes to Aleamotu'a

Greetings, I'm a bit perplexed as to why you're reverting my changes to Aleamotu'a. You left off an "=" in the ==References= heading (so it doesn't show up right), you removed the tag {{tonga-stub}}, which it certainly is, and you removed {{no footnotes}}, though the article does indeed lack in-line citations. Please do use the "Edit summary" to explain changes that you make, as otherwise it just appears that you're contradicting valid edits for no reason. Am I missing some good justification for those reverts? MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Hang on, how on earth is your User talk page a redirect? MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

It's seems to me that the ongoing vandalised of ny article has been done by the same vandal whose user name changed all the time. I have noticed that this vandal did vandalised my article Aleamotu'a under a name : Faletuipapai. This recent vandalised on my same article Aleamotu'a was done by that same person but changed his/ her username from Faletuipapai to Puakatau. I hope that wikipedia will look at this violation of my article done by this VANDAL under username: Faletuipapai/ Puakatau. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anacrossan (talk • contribs) 04:51, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not accuse other editors of "vandalism" without cause. "Vandalism" is filling a page with nonsense like "LALALALALALALALA", or things like "Tom Baker was a British sociologist who was abducted by monkeys and taken to the moon". To the eyes of an outside observer, the edits you object to appear to be credible, and are clearly footnoted. How does this constitute vandalism? If you feel that that user is pushing a biased perspective, or adding inaccurate information, please take it up on the Discussion page of that article. Further, both you and he have repeatedly removed the [[:Category:]] markings from the bottom of the page, effectively severing the article from the rest of Wikipedia. Please refrain from doing this; I'm actually quite confused as to why both sides keep doing this. Please take up your general issues with the article in Discussion, and also refrain from referring to it as "my article", as nobody has an exclusive claim to control of a Wikipedia article. You are a major editor of the article, but it is certainly not your property. Hoping to get some clarification from both editors in the Discussion page. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok. I am the primary editor as you pointed out, but to me the article that I have written has been vandalised. It has been totally erased and was replaced by information from outside that totally inaccurate to me. Please dont say to me that its not vandalised, when my article was totally wiped off! Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anacrossan (talk • contribs) 07:50, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

My aricle: Aleamotu'a has been erased again and again. Why is this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anacrossan (talk • contribs) 11:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Again, not "your" article, nor "vandalised". However, if you feel that an article you've been working on has been inaccurately edited, that is indeed an issue of concern. However, rather than engage in an "edit war", you need to go to the Dicussion page and clearly articulate why you feel this version is inaccurate. The other editor has done so, which certainly helps his case. In all honesty, unless you come and communicate with other editors, the default assumption will be that the other version is the correct one because it has been more clearly footnoted and formatted, and that editor has come forward to articulate his case on Discussion.

This article has been subject to extreme changes, and characterised by an almost total unwillingness to communicate by the various editors involved. Please come to Discussion and give clear, referenced, unemotional explanation as to why the substitute content is incorrect. There are a couple other editors, like me, who are not involved in Tongan issues at all and can be viewed as neutral in regional disputes. Further, if you and the other editor cannot reach an agreement it can be taken to an arbitration elsewhere on Wikipedia to get outside perspective. The one thing that cannot happen is to have the article bounce back and forth between two separate versions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Once again, you cannot simply blank the entire article. If you feel that it is inaccurately edited you must take that up in Discussion and provide clear examples. Not "he's being ignorant and he's wrong", but "footnotes 1-12 actually refer to Figure X instead of Figure Y", or "footnote #13 does not actually verify the cited fact", etc. Again, it's very hard to support your concerns if you do not communicate with other editors. If you continue to blank or revert the article, an admin can block your account, so you're far better off to click the Discussion tab at the top of the article and articulate your concerns. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

You really need to communicate, and learn more about how Wikipedia works

Greetings, I understand you're upset about disagreements on a number of Tonga articles. Again, I don't really know much about Tongan history, so I can't immediately tell exactly who is in the right on any given issue. What is clear to the casual reader, however, is that you appear to have little interest in communicating with any editor, competing or neutral. Wikipedia has established proceses by which conflicts are mediated, but instead you choose to blank articles (which, ironically, is vandalism) until you get your way.

Further, looking at your history it appears you have not learned even basic Wikipedia editing in several years here (longer than I've been here). Why do you not use == Title == to create proper section headings, not bold the title of articles, not add categories, etc? Again, it's hard to favour your versions of articles over competing ones when they are visually and organisationally a mess, not clearly foonoted in many cases, and when you never come to Discussion to explain why you feel your edits are correct and others' incorrect, prefering instead to call others "vandals". Some of the only times I've ever seen you post on someone's talk page is when you posted insults recently.

Please do yourself a huge favour and a) take a few looks at established Wikipedia articles to see how articles are formatted. Just hit "Edit" and you can see how they create heading and subheadings, put a clear summary at the top of the article with the article name bolded within the text, etc. b) In articles where you have a dispute, post a clear rebuttal of at least some of the points with which you disagree. If you don't do these things, regardless of how right your facts are, you will continue to make little progress. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:43, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Great rebuttal, and couple wiki pointers on technical details

Greetings! Very glad to see your case laid out so clearly on Aleamotu'a; hopefully the two competing articles can figure out which direction to take over the course of the week. It is a ton easier to sort this disputes out when people articulate their concerns to each other; avoids a ton of misunderstandings.

Had a couple minor points on a few Wikipedia format things that would be quick fixes for you.

• On quite a few occasions you've left an extra space before starting a paragraph. When you do that it creates a huge quote box that you didn't intend to put there. The solution is to hit "Preview" to check your edits before saving, and if you see a big box that means you have an extra space before starting a line.

Here's starting a line all the way on the left.

Here's a sentence with an extra space.

• Wikipedia articles should all start with a "lede" that gives the who/what/where/when/why details all in one paragraph, before getting into any other details. A lede should be understandable by any literate adult, even without knowing much about the subject. The first time the title is mentioned in the lede, and it should be one of the first phrases, it's bolded.

• For titles and subtitles, you put 2, 3, or 4 "=" signs on each side of the title. That will automatically size, bold, and underline the title appropriately.

.... except that in your recent reply on Talk:Aleamotu'a both spaced over (creating a huge box) and failed to sign your post with ~~~~, though a bot came in and signed it for you. MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

==Title==

===Subtitle===

====Sub-subtitle======

• When writing on a Talk/Discussion page, make sure to sign your posts, which is done automatically by your typing ~~~~ at the end of your comment.

When I type "MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)" at the end of a comment, it automatically becomes MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC) when I save the page.

Just a few easy pointers to make your work that much smoother.

Proposed deletion of Namoa

The article Namoa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure genealogy with no indication of who the people were or why they were important. No reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Auntof6 (talk) 00:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aleamotu'a, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Just put an explanation please! Endofskull (talk) 23:11, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anacrossan (talk • contribs) 23:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Endofskull (talk) 16:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Anacrossan My Friend

This showed how you lack the knowledge in Tongan History that you use the literal meaning of the name PUAKATAU, which is correct, however a more mature person in Tonga will know which islands I am from and where the name originated in Tongan History.

It is reference to the Aleamotu'a family and to independent academia and Missionaries who were in Tonga at that time, that Aleamotu'a was known as Tupou 'i Fale Tui Papai and was baptised as Josiah Tupou.

Mr Thomas wrote that the wife of Tupou was baptised in 1829 and her name was Moala and she was baptised as Mary, thus the name Mele (Mary) Moala. This confirmed that the Tupou he was baptising was Tupou 'i Fale Tui Papai also known as Aleamotu'a.

Always remember that Capt Cook arrived in Tonga in 1777. No one can read and write and the Tongan Languages was written to how Captain Cook heard the word.

It was in 1796 and 1822 that missionary arrived and then left Tonga because for their safety. In 1826 the Missionary arrived and settled and where they met Aleamotu'a. That was the beginning of how Tongan learned how to write and record things and the Tongan alphapet were developed.

To conclude this, any birthdates or dates mention before Captain Cook is a wild quest to shape your view. Tongan were still eating each other at this time. So please give up on the 1700s dates as you look ridiculous.

Researched the differences between Fialkepa and Aleamotu'a families as that is where your confusion started and take the chance for self promoting.

The most important point is to support your writing with independent sources from the Missionaries who recorded these history and dont just promote your partial family version of history.e.g

1. Aleamotu'a the Tu'i Kanokupolu's funeral in 1830? No record of such funeral.

2. Namoa is known as Tupou? No such record.

3. Namoa as Tupou is married to Mary Moala? No such record.

4. Namoa met Father Chevron in 1842? Fr Chevron wrote it was Alea Matu'a the Tu'i Kanokupolu he met in 1842 and he was baptised by the Wesleyan as Sosa'ia. Excuse the frenchmaan spelling he just arrived and still wrting the Tongans word as he heard them in the French Language....lol..

5. Mr Thomas wrote in 1826 that Tupou the King visit him in Hihifo. Other missionmaries wrote about Tupou the King in 1827, 1828, 1829 and even 1830. This conclude that your date of 1830 was not supported by facts as the missionaries were writing about Tupou as King since 1826 and this only point out that they were writing about Tupou 'i Faletuipapai (Aleamotu'a) who was King in 1826 to 1845 but was baptised as Josiah Tupou in 1830.

So I guess that you may shine by researching for the truth and stop reciting the same story with no evidence or supported facts. Puakatau (talk) 07:36, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

=ANSWER=

YOU ASK THE FOLLOWING QUESTION:

1) Why, Namoa and the period that he was King of Tonga ( 1830 -45) been erased from history of Tonga in late 1918?

FIRSTLY, WE ONLY ERASED SOMETHING IF IT WAS THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE. IF YOU REFERENCE TO MR THOMAS WRITING AND OTHER MISSIONARIES WHO WAS IN TONGA AT THE TIME OF 1826, THEY WILL REFER YOU THAT TUPOU WAS KING THEN AND RESIDED IN NUKU'ALOFA. SO WITH ALL THE WRITING OF THE MISSIONARIES, IT WAS ALL SAFE OVERSEAS AND THEIR BOOKS WAS PUBLISHED IN 1800S. THIS CONCLUDE THAT THEY WERE WRITING ABOUT TUPOU 'I FALE TUIPAPAI WHO WAS KNOWN AS ALEAMOTU'A AND KING SINCE 1826 AND DIED IN 1845, CAN YOU REFERENCED YOUR COMMENTCOOOO

2) Why, re-write the history of Tonga, and made out that Namoa's brother Aleamotu'a was also known as Siosaia Tupou, which he was not.

ALEAMOTU'A WAS KNOWN AS TUPOU 'I FALETUIPAPAI AND YOU CAN REFERENCE THAT FROM THE ARTICLE. CAN YOU PROVIDE PROOF FOR YOUR ALLEGED INFORMATION.

3) King Aleamotu'a did die with name, Aleamotu'a in 1830, never with the name Siosaia Tupou. Why added Siosaia after he already died in 1830?

THE MISSIONARIES WROTE IN 1826 WHEN TUPOU WAS SELECTED AS KING. tHIS WE ALL AGREE THAT THIS WAS ALEAMOTU'A WHO WAS KING AT THIS TIME. THE MISSIONARIES ALSO RECORDED THAT HE WAS INSTALLED IN HIHIFO IN DECEMBER 1827. aFTER THAT THEY WROTE THAT TUPOU WAS BAPTISED IN 1830 AND MARRIED HIS WIFE IN THE SAME SERVICES AND HIS WIFE WAS MARY MOALA WHO WAS BAPTISED EARLIER IN 1829. THERE WAS NO RECORD OF DEATH IN 1830 AS YOU ALLEGED BUT ONLY IN 1845.

CAN YOU PROVE YOUR STATEMENT? Puakatau (talk) 08:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aleamotu'a

A tag has been placed on Aleamotu'a, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Beeshoney (talk) 15:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Anacrossan My Friend

This showed how you lack the knowledge in Tongan History that you use the literal meaning of the name, which is correct, however a more mature person in Tonga will know which islands I am from and where the name originated in Tongan History.

It is reference to the Aleamotu'a family and to independent academia and Missionaries who were in Tonga at that time, that Aleamotu'a was known as Tupou 'i Fale Tui Papai and was baptised as Josiah Tupou.

Mr Thomas wrote that the wife of Tupou was baptised in 1829 and her name was Moala and she was baptised as Mary, thus the name Mele (Mary) Moala. This confirmed that the Tupou he was baptising was Tupou 'i Fale Tui Papai also known as Aleamotu'a.

Always remember that Capt Cook arrived in Tonga in 1777. No one can read and write and the Tongan Languages was written to how Captain Cook heard the word.

It was in 1796 and 1822 that missionary arrived and then left Tonga because for their safety. In 1826 the Missionary arrived and settled and where they met Aleamotu'a. That was the beginning of how Tongan learned how to write and record things and the Tongan alphapet were developed.

To conclude this, any birthdates or dates mention before Captain Cook is a wild quest to shape your view. Tongan were still eating each other at this time. So please give up on the 1700s dates as you look ridiculous.

Researched the differences between Fialkepa and Aleamotu'a families as that is where your confusion started and take the chance for self promoting.

The most important point is to support your writing with independent sources from the Missionaries who recorded these history and dont just promote your partial family version of history.e.g

1. Aleamotu'a the Tu'i Kanokupolu's funeral in 1830? No record of such funeral.

2. Namoa is known as Tupou? No such record.

3. Namoa as Tupou is married to Mary Moala? No such record.

4. Namoa met Father Chevron in 1842? Fr Chevron wrote it was Alea Matu'a the Tu'i Kanokupolu he met in 1842 and he was baptised by the Wesleyan as Sosa'ia. Excuse the frenchmaan spelling he just arrived and still wrting the Tongans word as he heard them in the French Language....lol..

So I guess that you may shine by researching for the truth.Puakatau (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Please joined the Wikipedia: Articles for deletion/Namoa 2nd time

Can you join the above and provide some independent article for verification of your position.Puakatau (talk) 17:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Namoa

Hi. Please don't remove the Articles for Deletion template from Namoa until the discussion there is complete. Without the template being displayed, people who are involved with the article won't be able to contribute to the discussion there. Thanks. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to Namoa, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 03:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Namoa . While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 22:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Talakaipau for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Talakaipau, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talakaipau until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Nomination of Hala 'o Vave for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Hala 'o Vave, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hala 'o Vave until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Soap— 16:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Are you still on Wikipedia? Benjimanlole (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Messages

Messages from the old talk page can be found in the collapsible below:

Extended content

July 2010 I will retype again my article to its original form. Right now I have a problem with my article, Aleamotu'a, being continuously vandalised by an username of Puakatau and Faletuipapai. Currently the username Puakatau is vandalising my article: ALEAMOTU'A BY DELETING ALL OF THEM. I really need help here. I am now going to retype again my article Al;eamotu'a. After deleting the vandals input. Thasnk you. Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Aleamotu'a. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it. If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Your recent edits Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2010 (UTC) Your recent edits Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:42, 26 July 2010 (UTC) August 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Aleamotu'a has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! [message] 23:33, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Aleamotu'a. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 23:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC) Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Aleamotu'a. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.   — Jeff G.  ツ 23:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC) September 2010 Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talakaipau has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. WikiTome Talk 06:04, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talakaipau. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. WikiTome Talk 06:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talakaipau. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WikiTome Talk 06:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Question about username

I notice you have your talk page at a different username than the one you are editing with. You edit as User:Anacrossan and your talk page is User talk:Lolopapalangi. This leads to confusion, for example I didn't realize you still were editing until just now. There are also people leaving warnings and other messages for you that won't show up because the Anacrossan page is redirected to this one. Do you want this page moved back to user talk:Anacrossan? —Soap— 16:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes please Soap. Please move it to Anacrossan page, thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anacrossan (talk • contribs) 04:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC) 

 Done —Soap— 16:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

I've pasted in some messages from your old talk page in the "messages" section above this (not below, because that seemed to make the page hard to read). Feel free to remove them once you read them. —Soap— 18:26, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that Puakatau,has been lobbying to delete the articles: Talakaipau and Hala 'o Vave. What I wrote on those articles are based on facts and neutral perspective. However it seems to me that Puakatau objectives is to delete those articles base on his myths and fairy tale stories reasons.

Look I will repeat here again that I don't give a damn whether you delete it! I stated here as I have already repeat time and time again. Aleamotu'a never have been Siosaia Tupou. Never have ever the early missionaries or any early records ever record that Aleamotu'a is Siosaia Tupou. This a contradictory to Puakatau's false and misleading claims that Aleamotu'a is Siosaia Tupou, which is quite a false claim.

Siosaia Tupou ( a.k.a. as Namoa in his early childhood life), known as Tupou in public was the initial holder of the title Siosaia Tupou! Talakaipau was his heredidary residence. His grandson Peni Tupou is still the registered owner of Talakaipau Residence to this date !

Anacrossan (talk) 04:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Verify your claim

The problem with your story is that you do not verify your story and some of your claim are contradicted by other sources.Puakatau (talk) 07:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Bula lol

I agree 100 percent Benjimanlole (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC)