Comparison of single-board computers

edit

Hi Andreas,

Thank you for contributing to the comparison of SBCs! From the comment you wrote for one of your recent changes I understand I owe you an explanation: the reason why I reverted your edit is that if we just add an entry in the first table, there’s very little information to compare it by (the title of the page is Comparison after all), making such entry not very useful.

Adding obsolete/discontinued products just makes the page longer and slower to load, with no benefit at all ‒ there are so many SBC being put on sale and discontinued at such as speed that if we were to list them all in one page, it would quickly become useless and possibly eligible for deletion from Wikipedia (see WP:NOTDIRECTORY).

Also, it’s confusing if an entry only appears in the first table; I and other people find it very confusing when we’re trying to track a row across multiple tables just to find out that it’s not there.

I see from what you write that you miss the old list page that was merged into the comparison page. If that’s what you want, nothing is stopping you from restoring it as a separate page (instead of a redirect) and adding entries to it.

In friendship, ColdShine 00:49, 23 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of InfoTM for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InfoTM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InfoTM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 14:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

infotm page

edit

Hey, i was not aware that the page InfoTM was deleted, not sure why they deleted it but it's pretty dumb. Anyways i have created it because it was required for many wiki articles and to list the SoC's. If you can help me to fill it it would be awesome because my english skills aren't the bests. ;) Unknowcontributor (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leadcore Technology

edit
 

The article Leadcore Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. Lack of independent sources with in-depth coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Imcdc Contact 14:29, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply