User talk:AndrewMedsLLC

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Meds (August 7)

Draft declined

2=50px

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:

This draft reads like an advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for promotion or marketing. Drafts that are exclusively promotional may be deleted without notice.

Wikipedia articles must be written neutrally in a formal, impersonal, and dispassionate way. They should not read like a blog post, advertisement, or fan page. Rewrite the draft to remove:

• promotional language: see Words to watch;
• personal commentary: opinions or direct addresses to the reader;
• informal language.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

If you have a conflict of interest (e.g. you are the subject, an employee, or a relative) or are being paid to edit, you must disclose this to comply with Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Andrew Meds to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

In solidarity, nil ^nz 05:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, AndrewMedsLLC! Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article. Need help? For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know. To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk. For peer support regarding all other editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a friendly question and answer hub for new editors. We'd love to see you there! In solidarity, nil nz 05:34, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Andrew Meds

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Andrew Meds, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AndrewMedsLLC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:AndrewMedsLLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:39, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because the initial draft was a temporary placeholder that has now been completely overwritten from a strict, neutral, third-person point of view. It serves purely as an encyclopedic overview of the company's operating structure, location, and services. All marketing jargon, company slogans, and promotional pronouns have been removed. Furthermore, I am a connected editor and have officially added a Conflict of Interest (COI) disclosure to the top of the page to fully comply with Wikipedia policies.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Meds (August 7)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:49, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit. Staraction (talk · contribs) 05:51, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AndrewMedsLLC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand that my username "AndrewMedsLLC" violates the username policy by representing a company rather than an individual. I would like to request a username change to a personal name to comply with policies. I have also added a Conflict of Interest disclosure on my page and intend to use the Articles for Creation process neutrally under my new personal account name.

Decline reason:

Great. Please follow the instructions provided to make a request that simultaneously proposes a new username. Please write in your own words without the use of an AI, we want to talk with you directly. We do not expect perfect grammar and spelling. You say you disclosed a COI, but I don't see where you did this. In any event, you need to disclose as a paid editor because I gather that you are employed by Andrew Meds LLC. 331dot (talk) 06:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you used an LLM or AI to write your appeal? Please include the phrase "per my previous point" in the first sentence. In solidarity, nil ^nz 06:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Sorry about the abopve, I was not awrae. Further, I am not the paid employee however owns the company. The purpose was to provide awarness of my company. I understand teh usename logic now. Please chnage teh user name to AndrewM_2026. Thank you for assitanbce any inclovienance and it will nit happen again.

Intentionally introducing a series of highly unlikely spelling mistakes and letter switches/typos to try to demonstrate you're not using an LLM is kinda hilarious. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:22, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

It was not intentional. could you please review my above request, thanks AndrewMedsLLC (talk) 06:25, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Your above request was reviewed and declined. Please submit a new request by carefully following the instructions left here. In solidarity, nil ^nz 06:28, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

It was. And you're continuing dishonesty should be of concern to any reviewing admin. Creating a typo like 'teh' instead of 'the' twice is virtually impossible. Typos occur when you accidentally hit one letter instead of the other. So a typo like 'thr' or 'tge' is way more likely to happen considering the proximity of the letters. To create teh instead of the you would have to hit a wrong button on the otherside of the keyboard, which just isn't plausibly happening, much less twice pretty back to back. Further, you hadn't had a single typo/misspelling in any prior communication with us, but we're supposed to believe you had eight in one reply? But none any where else?

Using AI is bad, attempting to fabricate plausible deniability is so much worse as it shows a willingness to WP:GAME the system to your benefit. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

@331dot COI declaration was stopped by a filter hit. Nobody (talk) 06:37, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AndrewMedsLLC/sandbox

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:AndrewMedsLLC/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - TurquoiseGoose•they/them•(talk) 07:16, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

AndrewMedsLLC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Your proposed new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Your reason here AndrewMedsLLC (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you:
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. bonadea contributions talk 08:53, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

I haven’t received any compensation received for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.

I understand the reason for your block and that will not repeat the kind of edits for which I were blocked; and

I am ready to make contributions intend to make if I am unblocked; and

The new username is AndrewM_99 AndrewMedsLLC (talk) 17:05, 7 August 2026 (UTC)