February 2012

edit

  Please do not write an article about yourself, as you did at ‎Angelique Kithos. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Bazj (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Angelique Kithos

edit
 

The article Angelique Kithos has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. DoriTalkContribs 21:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am her agent and created the page not knowing that my screen name could not match my client's name.
Please advise what I need to do to keep this page live. I have included references in the write up. Angeliquekithos 22:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
From the point of view of WP, the article currently contains no references. What's needed are verifiable and reliable independent secondary sources that contain significant coverage about her life (i.e., not just photos of her). If they can be added, great! If not, well, no sources means no article. DoriTalkContribs 01:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've nominated the images for deletion since they are clearly not your "own work", and there is no evidence that Playboy or OBX have released them as public domain Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:46, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I own the rights to the images which are why they were uploaded. Would you like to see the raw files that sit on my camera?